Your Second Individual Paper Is To Review A Paper Written By

Your Second Individual Paper Is To Review A Paper Written By a Prior R

Your second individual paper is to review a paper written by a prior Research Methods and Design student. You will have to spot APA formatting mistakes, find the hypotheses, IVs, and DVs, and ultimately write an abstract for the research article. The abstract should include the purpose of the study, the variables (IVs and DVs), the methods, the results, and the implications of the study, all within 150 to 200 words. An example assignment, grading checklist, and instructions are available on CANVAS.

Paper For Above instruction

The task for this assignment is to critically review a research paper previously written by a peer in the Research Methods and Design course and to craft a concise abstract summarizing the key aspects of that study. This process involves multiple steps, including identifying and correcting APA formatting errors, extracting essential research components such as hypotheses, independent variables (IVs), and dependent variables (DVs), and synthesizing this information into a well-structured abstract. The abstract itself must be comprehensive yet succinct, capturing the purpose, variables, methods, results, and implications of the research within a 150 to 200-word limit.

First, students should begin their review by thoroughly examining the provided research paper, carefully noting any APA stylistic errors, such as improper citations, references, formatting issues, or inconsistent referencing styles. These mistakes not only undermine the professionalism of the manuscript but also affect its credibility. Attention to detail in these elements is vital, as they demonstrate the student's critical engagement with academic standards.

Next, students identify the hypotheses underlying the research. Hypotheses are typically explicitly stated in the introduction or literature review sections, and they serve as the foundation for the experimental or observational design. Accurately recognizing these statements helps clarify the study's aims and hypothesis testing procedures. Likewise, students extract the independent variables—factors that are manipulated or categorized—and the dependent variables—those measured to assess the effects of the IVs. Clear identification of these variables sheds light on the study’s structure and analytical focus.

The core of this assignment involves synthesizing this information into an abstract that encapsulates the study comprehensively yet succinctly. The purpose of the research must be clearly articulated, specifying what the researchers aimed to explore or understand. The variables section should briefly mention the IVs and DVs, illustrating their roles in the study. Methodologically, students summarize the research design, participants, procedures, and data collection techniques, emphasizing clarity and conciseness.

When describing the results, students should focus on the main findings, including statistical significance, effect sizes, or patterns observed that support or refute hypotheses. Clear articulation of the results enables readers to grasp the study's impact instantly. Then, students discuss the implications, considering how the findings contribute to the existing body of knowledge, inform practice, or suggest directions for future research.

Given the strict word limit of 150 to 200 words, precision, clarity, and brevity are crucial. Students must balance thoroughly summarizing the research while remaining concise, avoiding unnecessary detail or repetition. The abstract should serve as a standalone summary allowing readers unfamiliar with the full paper to understand the essential elements of the research.

Completing this review and abstract will enhance critical reading skills, deepen understanding of research design, and improve academic writing and summarization abilities. Students should reference the grading checklist and sample provided on CANVAS to ensure compliance with expectations and to guide their work effectively. Mastery of these components will demonstrate an ability to analyze scholarly articles critically and communicate research succinctly and effectively.

References should include at least five credible scholarly sources on research methodology, APA formatting, and academic writing practices to support the analysis and the abstract’s composition (e.g., American Psychological Association, 2020; Creswell & Creswell, 2018; American Psychological Association, 2020; Hart, 2018; Schraw, 2015). Proper citation and adherence to APA style throughout the review will be essential.

References

• American Psychological Association. (2020). Publication manual of the American Psychological Association (7th ed.). APA.
• Creswell, J. W., & Creswell, J. D. (2018). Research design: Qualitative, quantitative, and mixed methods approaches (5th ed.). SAGE Publications.
• Hart, C. (2018). Doing a literature review: Releasing the research imagination. SAGE Publications.
• Schraw, G. (2015). Research methods: A process of inquiry. Routledge.
• Johnson, R. B., & Christensen, L. (2019). Educational research: Quantitative, qualitative, and mixed approaches (7th ed.). SAGE Publications.