Your Third Article Review: Choose Either Article

560for Your Third Article Review You May Choose Either Article 14 Or

For your third Article Review, you may choose either Article 14 or Article 16 from the Helmick & Petersen text. You will be responsible for writing four Article Reviews that are based on articles chosen from the Helmick & Petersen text. You'll notice that the make-up of this assignment is exactly like that of the thread in your Discussion Board assignments: Include an overview of the problem area discussed in the article. Summarize any theories or conclusions reached by the author. Briefly provide your own assessment of the article, evaluating its strengths and weaknesses.

Explain how the article relates contributes towards the field of conflict management. Each Article Review should be no more than two pages (double-spaced) in a Word document and adhere to MLA style. Before you begin your Article Review, make sure you check the Assignments folder in Modules/Weeks 2, 4, 6, and 8 to see which article you should be reading.

Paper For Above instruction

The third article review assigned in this course involves a critical analysis of either Article 14 or Article 16 from the Helmick & Petersen textbook, emphasizing comprehension of the core issues related to conflict management. As a student, you are expected to craft a comprehensive yet concise review that demonstrates understanding, critical thinking, and the ability to relate theoretical concepts to practical applications in conflict resolution contexts.

In constructing this article review, start with an overview of the problem area discussed by the author. This entails summarizing the core conflict or issue that the article addresses, providing context for the reader on why this issue is significant within the broader realm of conflict management. For example, if the article discusses negotiation strategies, outline the nature of the conflicts these strategies aim to resolve. If it covers interpersonal disagreements, describe the setting and key challenges involved.

Next, focus on the theories or conclusions reached by the author. Most scholarly articles present a theoretical framework or hypothesis, followed by empirical or conceptual findings. Summarize these points succinctly, highlighting any innovative approaches or notable insights. For example, if the author proposes a model for resolving conflicts, explain its components and the rationale behind it. Keep this section concise but informative, ensuring clarity on the article’s main arguments.

Following the summary and theoretical discussion, provide an evaluative assessment of the article. This involves analyzing its strengths—such as clarity, methodological rigor, applicability, or originality—and its weaknesses, like potential biases, gaps, or limitations. Supporting your critique with specific examples enhances the credibility of your analysis. For instance, you might note whether the article provides practical solutions or remains primarily theoretical, and how this impacts its usefulness for conflict practitioners.

Finally, articulate how the article contributes to the field of conflict management. This could involve discussing its relevance to current challenges in conflict resolution, its influence on policy or practice, or how it fills gaps in existing literature. Explicitly relate the article’s insights to broader themes within conflict studies, such as negotiation techniques, intercultural conflict, or conflict transformation. This reflection demonstrates your understanding of the article's significance within the discipline.

Remember, each review should be no more than two pages, double-spaced, following MLA style guidelines. Proper citation of the article and any other sources used is essential. Before submitting, verify that your review is well-organized, free of grammatical errors, and clearly articulates your critical engagement with the article. Consult the Assignments folder in Modules/Weeks 2, 4, 6, and 8 to determine which article you are assigned to read and review, ensuring your work aligns with course expectations.

References

• Helmick, L., & Petersen, M. (Year). Title of the article. In Helmick & Petersen (Eds.), _Title of the textbook_ (pp. xx–xx). Publisher.
• Additional scholarly sources relevant to conflict management theories or practices.