Your Third Brief Essay Focus: Revising An

For Your Third Brief Essay Your Focus Will Be On Revising And Editing

For your third brief essay, your focus will be on revising and editing your first essay. Overall, you will be expanding your first essay, adding 1-2 pages in length to the 3 you have already written. You should begin by proofreading your paper lightly, and deciding which areas could be expanded. Consider: do you want to add all-new paragraphs, or do you want to expand existing paragraphs, or do a combination of both? The second part of this assignment is to edit and revise your first essay based on all that we have studied this semester.

Consider some of the following: Are there weak points in your argument? Did you find any evidence of biases, complexes, or fallacies? Or, did you seem to avoid those altogether? Is there a good balance between logos, pathos, and ethos? Were your in-text citations accurate, or do those need fixing?

Did your works cited page match MLA style, or did it need correction? Did you happen to use a weak source that you now decide is unreliable? Did you use proper paragraph structure, with topic and conclusion sentences? Overall, did you need to fix your grammar, punctuation, or spelling? Considering all of the handouts and guides we have used, what other corrections need to be made?

Were fixes required to structure and style issues, such as your headers, heading, margin widths, indentations, and related requirements? Assignment Details: Your final product should be a clean, revised 4-5 page-long essay.

Paper For Above instruction

The third brief essay assignment emphasizes the importance of revising and editing the initial draft to enhance clarity, coherence, and argumentative strength. This process involves expanding the original essay by adding 1-2 pages, which may be achieved through developing new paragraphs or elaborating on existing ones. The initial step focuses on light proofreading to identify areas that necessitate expansion or clarification, helping to create a more comprehensive and polished argument.

Effective revision is pivotal to producing a compelling academic paper. This involves critically evaluating the essay for weak points in the argumentation, such as unsupported claims, biases, fallacies, or logical inconsistencies. Recognizing and addressing these issues enhances the credibility and persuasiveness of the work. For instance, evaluating whether the essay offers a balanced appeal to logos, ethos, and pathos ensures a well-rounded rhetorical strategy. Strengthening the ethical appeal through credible sources and appropriate tone, along with emotional resonance and logical reasoning, contributes to a more convincing message.

Attention to proper citation practices and formatting is also essential. Ensuring that in-text citations are accurate and consistent with MLA style contributes to the scholarly integrity of the essay. Additionally, reviewing the Works Cited page for proper MLA formatting—such as correct spacing, punctuation, and citation order—is crucial. Identifying and replacing weak or unreliable sources further improves the essay's credibility. Alongside citation accuracy, meticulous editing of paragraph structure—employing clear topic sentences, coherence within paragraphs, and effective conclusion sentences—augments readability and flow.

Language mechanics, including grammar, punctuation, and spelling, must also be thoroughly checked. Correcting errors enhances clarity and professionalism. Furthermore, revisiting structural and stylistic elements—such as header placement, margin adjustments, indentation, and overall formatting—ensures compliance with assignment guidelines and academic standards.

Ultimately, the goal is to produce a polished, well-organized, and thoroughly revised 4-5 page essay that reflects careful consideration of content, structure, and style. The revision process is integral to developing critical thinking and writing skills, leading to a more persuasive and academically rigorous final product that demonstrates effective engagement with course materials and standards.

References

• Graff, G., & Birkenstein, C. (2018). They Say / I Say: The Moves That Matter in Academic Writing (4th ed.). W. W. Norton & Company.
• Hacker, D., & Sommers, N. (2016). A Pocket Style Manual (6th ed.). Bedford/St. Martin's.
• Lunsford, A. A. (2017). Easy Writer (5th ed.). Bedford/St. Martin's.
• Moore, J. (2015). Writing with Clarity and Style: A Guide to Rhetorical Devices for Contemporary Writers. Routledge.
• Oshima, A., & Hogue, A. (2006). Writing Academic English (4th ed.). Pearson Education.
• Perl, S. (2013). The Craft of Research (3rd ed.). University of Chicago Press.
• Ramage, J. D., Bean, J. C., & Blinn, L. (2017). Writing Arguments: A Rhetoric and Reader (7th ed.). Bedford/St. Martin's.
• Turabian, K. L., & Booth, W. C. (2018). A Manual for Writers of Research Papers, Theses, and Dissertations (9th ed.). University of Chicago Press.
• Williams, J. M. (2016). Style: Toward Clarity and Grace (3rd ed.). University of Chicago Press.
• Yin, R. K. (2018). Case Study Research and Applications: Design and Methods. Sage Publications.