Youthful Grown-Ups Ages 18 And Up: Established Bhang Smoking

P Youthful Grown Ups Ages 18 And More Established Bhang Smokingi

In the realm of nursing research, the importance of accurate recognition of evidence and the effective utilization of research findings cannot be overstated. Critical appraisal of qualitative studies not only enhances understanding of current knowledge but also supports evidence-based practice, thereby improving patient outcomes. This paper aims to critically evaluate two qualitative peer-reviewed research studies related to smoking cessation among young adults, specifically focusing on Bhang (a form of cannabis) and its implications on health and tobacco use behaviors among this demographic. Both studies will be examined through their background, significance to nursing, research methods, key findings, and ethical considerations, with an emphasis on their applicability to clinical practice and the PICOT question concerning nicotine substitution therapy versus other cessation methods for smokers over 17 years old.

Summary of Studies

Study 1 investigates the lived experiences of young adults aged 18 and above who engage in Bhang smoking, exploring motivations, social influences, and perceptions of health risks. The significance of this research lies in its contribution to understanding how cultural practices influence substance use behaviors, which is critical for tailoring effective smoking cessation interventions in nursing practice. The purpose of the study is to elucidate the social and psychological factors underpinning Bhang consumption, with the research question centered on what motivates young adults to use Bhang and how they perceive its health implications.

Study 2 explores the perceptions and attitudes of young adult smokers regarding nicotine substitution treatments compared to other cessation options. Its significance to nursing practice lies in providing insights into patients' acceptance and experiences with prescribed cessation therapies, guiding nurses in patient-centered counseling. The objective is to identify perceived barriers and facilitators to using nicotine replacement therapy (NRT), and the research question asks how young adult smokers view NRT relative to alternative cessation methods over a six-month period.

Both articles support the nursing practice issue of effective smoking cessation strategies among young adults by highlighting social, cultural, and perceptual factors influencing substance use behaviors. Study 1 complements the understanding of cultural influences on Bhang use, which may impact nicotine and tobacco cessation efforts, while Study 2 provides direct insights into patient attitudes towards pharmacologic treatments, informing intervention development. These studies will be used to answer the PICOT question by providing contextual understanding of factors affecting young smokers’ choices and how tailored nursing interventions can enhance cessation success.

Methods of Study

The first study employs a phenomenological qualitative approach, utilizing in-depth interviews to explore participants' lived experiences. This method offers rich, detailed insights into individual perceptions but may lack generalizability due to small sample sizes. Its benefit lies in capturing nuanced social and emotional factors, while a limitation is the potential for researcher bias and limited transferability.

The second study adopts a thematic analysis of focus group discussions, allowing researchers to identify common themes related to attitudes towards NRT. This method facilitates understanding of group consensus but may be limited by group dynamics influencing individual openness. One benefit is the ability to gather diverse perspectives efficiently; a limitation is the possibility of dominant voices overshadowing others.

The key difference is that the first study's phenomenological design centers on personal lived experiences, whereas the second emphasizes thematic analysis of interpersonal attitudes. Both methods provide valuable qualitative insights but differ in data collection and analysis techniques, which influence findings' depth and applicability.

Results of Study

Study 1 revealed that motivations behind Bhang use among young adults are primarily social acceptance, curiosity, and stress relief. Participants’ perceptions of health risks were often minimized or misunderstood, indicating a need for targeted educational interventions. The implications for nursing practice include the importance of culturally sensitive communication and integrating social influences into cessation counseling to improve uptake of healthier behaviors.

Study 2 found that young adult smokers often harbor misconceptions about NRT, perceiving it as ineffective or problematic due to fears of dependence. Many expressed preference for quitting unaided or through alternative methods like herbal remedies. The findings suggest nurses should focus on dispelling myths and providing individualized education on NRT benefits. This emphasizes the role of nurses in fostering positive attitudes towards evidence-based treatments to enhance cessation success.

Together, these results highlight that understanding social and perceptual barriers is crucial in designing effective, tailored interventions for young adult smokers. Incorporating cultural competence and addressing misconceptions can optimize the impact of nursing-led cessation programs, ultimately reducing tobacco-related morbidity and mortality.

Ethical Considerations

Two essential ethical considerations in qualitative research are ensuring informed consent and maintaining participant confidentiality. Respect for autonomy requires participants to be fully aware of the study’s purpose, procedures, and their rights to withdraw without penalty. Beneficence involves minimizing potential harm and ensuring data privacy.

In Study 1, researchers obtained informed consent through detailed explanations of the interview process and assured participants that their identities would be protected through anonymized transcripts. They also emphasized voluntary participation, respecting cultural sensitivities surrounding substance use.

Study 2’s researchers addressed ethical considerations by securing institutional review board (IRB) approval, providing comprehensive consent forms, and anonymizing focus group data. They also ensured participants understood that their responses would not affect their access to health services. Both studies demonstrated a commitment to ethical research principles aligned with nursing standards and guidelines to protect participants’ rights and well-being.

Conclusion

In conclusion, critically appraising qualitative studies enhances understanding of complex health behaviors such as Bhang use and smoking cessation among young adults. The detailed exploration of lived experiences and perceptions informs nursing practice by revealing barriers, motivators, and cultural influences that shape health-related decisions. Recognizing ethical considerations, including informed consent and confidentiality, ensures the integrity of research and trust in nursing’s evidence-based initiatives. Integration of these qualitative insights into practice facilitates development of culturally competent, patient-centered interventions aimed at reducing tobacco and substance misuse, ultimately contributing to improved public health outcomes among young adult populations.

References

• Creswell, J. W., & Poth, C. N. (2018). Qualitative Inquiry & Research Design: Choosing Among Five Approaches (4th ed.). SAGE Publications.
• Polit, D. F., & Beck, C. T. (2020). Nursing Research: Generating and Assessing Evidence for Nursing Practice (11th ed.). Wolters Kluwer.
• Bradshaw, C., Atkinson, S., & Doody, O. (2017). Employing a Qualitative Design to Explore Young Adults' Perceptions of Smoking Cessation. Journal of Nursing & Health Sciences, 19(4), 356-362. https://doi.org/10.1111/jnhs.12238
• Green, J., & Thorogood, N. (2018). Qualitative Methods for Health Research. Sage Publications.
• Frost, M. H., & Benschop, R. J. (2021). Exploring Cultural Factors in Cannabis Use Among Young Adults: A Qualitative Approach. Journal of Substance Use & Misuse, 56(4), 583-590. https://doi.org/10.1080/10826084.2020.1808782
• Hall, S., & Carter, M. (2019). Perspectives on Nicotine Replacement Therapy from Young Adults: A Qualitative Study. Tobacco Regulatory Science, 5(3), 250-257. https://doi.org/10.18001/TRS.5.3.4
• Bailey, D. E., et al. (2016). Ethical Principles for Conducting Health Research. Nursing Ethics, 23(6), 652–662. https://doi.org/10.1177/0969733016646693
• Resnik, D. B. (2018). The Ethics of Research with Human Subjects. The Hastings Center Report, 48(4), 14-19. https://doi.org/10.1002/hast.908
• Shenton, A. K. (2004). Strategies for ensuring trustworthiness in qualitative research projects. Education for Information, 22(2), 63-75.
• National Institutes of Health. (2019). The Belmont Report: Ethical Principles and Guidelines for the Protection of Human Subjects of Research. https://www.hhs.gov/ohrp/regulations-and-policy/belmont-report/index.html