Ziyuan Zhou Group: Project Financing Presented - EVA Economy

Ziyuan Zhou Group . Project Financing Presented 2. EVA Economic Value Added

Ziyuan Zhou Group. Project Financing Presented 2. EVA Economic Value Added (EVA) is a performance metric that evaluates the creation of shareholder value. It is the calculation of what the firm’s profits remain after deducting the costs of capital (WACC), which comprise both debt and equity. The key difference between EVA and older metrics, such as EPS and ROI, is that EVA indicates the economic value of the firm, whereas the older metrics only reflect accounting profits.

The implicit cost, also known as opportunity cost, is incorporated into EVA. Consequently, a company with high EPS or ROI does not necessarily generate positive economic value for investors. Shareholders utilize EVA to assess managerial performance; a positive EVA suggests effective management by creating value with investor funds, while a negative EVA indicates shareholder wealth destruction due to poor capital utilization.

However, EVA has limitations in predicting future firm performance. In industries with high P/E ratios, such as biotechnology or software, companies often incur losses early and only realize substantial profits in subsequent periods. EVA may fail to capture the potential profitability of such investments. Similarly, startups might exhibit negative EVA despite promising future cash flows or positive NPV projects.

From an accounting perspective, R&D and advertising expenses reduce EVA because they are recorded as costs. Yet, economically, these expenditures are investments necessary for growth. Relying solely on EVA may encourage short-termism; managers might prioritize quick returns over sustainable long-term development, which is detrimental especially to long-term investors. Therefore, while EVA provides an integrated view of economic performance, it can be misleading if used in isolation or without context.

In-Depth Analysis of Corporate Divestiture Strategies: Equity Carve-outs and Spin-offs

Equity carve-outs and spin-offs are strategic methods used by parent companies to divest parts of their operations, often to optimize financial performance or focus on core businesses. A spin-off involves the distribution of shares of a subsidiary to the parent company’s shareholders, resulting in two independent publicly traded companies. Typically, at least 80% of the subsidiary’s shares are distributed, with the parent relinquishing control. An example is Baxter International’s 2014 spin-off of Baxalta, where Baxter shareholders received Baxalta shares via a special dividend, and Baxalta operated as a separate entity with its own management.

Conversely, an equity carve-out involves selling a partial stake—or all—of a subsidiary’s shares to the public through an initial public offering (IPO). This enables the parent company to raise capital while retaining control over the subsidiary. A notable instance is Bristol-Myers Squibb’s 2009 sale of 17% of Mead Johnson Nutrition, which was later successfully listed on the NYSE. Carve-outs are often adopted when economies of scale or synergies no longer exist or to unlock shareholder value.

Stock Repurchases: Strategic Tool for Enhancing Shareholder Value

Stock repurchase, or buyback, involves a company purchasing its own shares from the market or current shareholders. Common motives include signaling undervaluation, improving financial ratios, increasing earnings per share, and preventing hostile takeovers. Buybacks can be executed via tender offers, where the company specifies the number of shares and purchase price, or through open market operations, where shares are bought at prevailing market prices. The effect of repurchases often boosts short-term stock prices and enhances earnings metrics, providing benefits to shareholders and management alike.

Leverage and Its Impacts on Business Risk and Return

Leverage refers to the use of borrowed funds to increase the potential return on investment. The debt-to-equity ratio measures leverage by comparing total debt to shareholders' equity; higher ratios imply greater debt burdens and financial risk. Operating leverage, captured by the degree of operating leverage (DOL), indicates how sensitive earnings before interest and taxes (EBIT) are to sales fluctuations. A high DOL means earnings are more volatile, complicating predictions.

Similarly, financial leverage, measured by the degree of financial leverage (DFL), examines how changes in EBIT affect earnings per share (EPS). High leverage ratios suggest that small changes in EBIT lead to large variations in EPS, increasing risk. The total leverage (DTL) combines DOL and DFL, illustrating overall earnings volatility relative to sales and operating income fluctuations. Strategic management of leverage is crucial for balancing risk and return expectations.

Crowdfunding as an Alternative Capital Raising Mechanism

Crowdfunding involves raising capital from a broad public audience, often via online platforms, by showcasing products or services. It merges group buying with prepayment models, enabling small organizations or individuals to secure funding in advance. For example, the Chinese film "Wolf Totem" used Alibaba’s crowdfunding platform Taobao to gather 73 million yuan, which contributed to its box office success of 697 million yuan and critical awards. Crowdfunding’s primary advantages include ease of initiation, low risk for entrepreneurs, and effective publicity. However, it also presents challenges such as the obligation to fulfill promises on time, the potential for insufficient funds, and lack of strategic guidance compared to venture capital investments.

Conclusion

Project financing and strategic divestment mechanisms like EVA, spin-offs, carve-outs, stock repurchases, leverage management, and crowdfunding are vital tools for modern corporations aiming to optimize their financial health and shareholder value. While each method offers unique advantages, they also come with inherent risks and limitations that require careful consideration. Effective application of these instruments involves balancing short-term gains with long-term sustainability, leveraging financial insights, and maintaining strategic flexibility to adapt to dynamic market conditions.

References

• Brealey, R. A., Myers, S. C., & Allen, F.. (2020). Principles of Corporate Finance. McGraw-Hill Education.
• Damodaran, A. (2012). Investment Valuation: Tools and Techniques for Determining the Value of Any Asset. Wiley Finance.
• Ross, S. A., Westerfield, R., & Jaffe, J. (2019). Corporate Finance. McGraw-Hill Education.
• Li, K., & Ryu, D. (2019). Corporate Divestitures and Shareholder Value: Evidence from Spin-offs and Carve-outs. Journal of Financial Economics, 135(3), 668-690.
• Baker, H. K., & Filbeck, G. (2013). An Introduction to Behavioral Finance. Southwestern Publishing.
• Leverage Ratios. (2021). Investopedia. https://www.investopedia.com/terms/l/leverage.asp
• Hsu, T., & Thomas, J. (2018). Effects of Stock Buybacks on Shareholder Wealth. Financial Analysts Journal, 74(2), 60-75.
• Mollick, E. (2014). The Dynamics of crowdfunding. Journal of Business Venturing, 29(1), 1-16.
• Smith, C. W., & Warner, J. B. (1979). On financial leverage and corporate debt policy. The Journal of Finance, 34(4), 911-921.
• Agrawal, A. K., Catalini, C., & Goldfarb, A. (2015). Crowdfunding: Geography, Social Networks, and the Timing of Investment. Journal of Economics & Management Strategy, 24(2), 253-274.