A 1-2 Page Response To The Following Questions
A 1-2 Page Response To The Following Questions In Your Final Draftcan
A 1-2 page response to the following questions in your final draft: Can science help answer questions about how or if we should be using non-renewable energy resources? To support your answer, select one example (e.g., oil in the Alaskan National Wildlife Refuge, oil in the Middle East, mountaintop mining in Kentucky) and explain the role of science in the decision-making process. The last assignment you did she did give credit for this section because it wasn't in the paper. Can you please do 1-2 paragraphs: Discuss the difference between qualitative and quantitative research/evidence and which of the evidence was qualitative (and who gave use this evidence) and which is quantitative.
Paper For Above instruction
Science plays a crucial role in informing policy decisions related to the use of non-renewable energy resources by providing empirical evidence about environmental, economic, and social impacts. Scientific research helps quantify the effects of resource extraction and consumption, which is essential for balancing energy needs with sustainability goals. For example, in the case of oil extraction in the Alaskan National Wildlife Refuge (ANWR), scientific studies have assessed the potential impacts on wildlife habitats, caribou migration, and climate change. These studies provide quantitative data, such as measurements of greenhouse gas emissions, habitat loss, and ecosystem changes, which policymakers can use to evaluate the environmental risks associated with drilling in protected areas. Scientific evidence in this context often comes from environmental scientists, ecologists, and climate researchers, who produce data that objectively measure these impacts.
Conversely, qualitative research provides non-numerical insights related to human values, cultural significance, and social implications of energy resource development. For example, local communities and indigenous groups may offer perspectives on how oil development affects their culture, lifestyle, and traditions. Such evidence is often gathered through interviews, focus groups, and ethnographic studies. These narrative accounts help decision-makers understand the social dimensions that quantitative data alone cannot capture. Both types of evidence are essential; scientific quantitative data helps assess environmental and physical impacts, while qualitative evidence offers insights into social and cultural considerations. Together, they enable more comprehensive decision-making about non-renewable resource use, ensuring that policies are scientifically grounded and socially just.
References
- Bell, S., & Morse, S. (2013). sustainability indicators: measuring the immeasurable? Routledge.
- Carley, S., & Konisky, D. M. (2020). The justice and equity implications of renewable energy development. Nature Sustainability, 3(8), 695-703.
- McNie, E. C. (2007). Clarifying the roles of science in natural resource policymaking: The need for targeted communication. Society & Natural Resources, 20(3), 239-254.
- Pritchard, L., & Gilchrist, M. (2013). The role of qualitative research in policy development. Environmental Policy and Governance, 23(4), 258-271.
- Reed, M. S. (2008). Stakeholder participation for environmental management: A literature review. Biological Conservation, 141(10), 2417-2431.
- Satterfield, T., & Mertz, C. K. (2013). Values in environmental decision making. Environmental Management, 51(4), 674-689.
- Shrivastava, P. (2010). Environmental sustainability and corporations: Going beyond green. Journal of Business Ethics, 94(1), 81-91.
- Sulaiman, A., & Noor, M. (2017). Quantitative vs qualitative research: An overview. International Journal of Academic Research, 9(4), 1-6.
- Van der Ven, H., & Jobert, A. (2016). Engaging stakeholder perspectives in energy policy. Energy Policy, 98, 360-370.
- Wilson, G. A. (2012). Community sustainability and environmental justice: The role of stakeholder participation. Local Environment, 17(2), 123-136.