A Crucial Starting Point To Developing An Effective Disaster

A Crucial Starting Point To Developing An Effective Disaster Recovery

A crucial starting point to developing an effective disaster recovery plan is by cultivating an efficient Business Impact Analysis (BIA). A BIA evaluates and identifies vulnerabilities and conveys how these known and unknown risks will impact the organization’s core business processes and functions. More importantly, it enables an organization to strategically plan alternative practices and procedures to minimize the impact of the disruption on systems, functions, and services. This week you will conduct a BIA for a real organization. The purpose of this assignment is to enable you to engage and actively think through some of the components required to develop a BIA, which guides an organization’s disaster planning efforts.

Paper For Above instruction

The organization selected for this Business Impact Analysis (BIA) is Amazon, a global e-commerce and cloud computing company headquartered in Seattle, Washington. Amazon.com, Inc. (website: https://www.amazon.com) primarily offers online retail services, cloud computing solutions through Amazon Web Services (AWS), digital streaming, and artificial intelligence services. Key stakeholders include customers, vendors, employees, shareholders, and regulatory agencies. Amazon’s vast customer base and supply chain make its operational resilience critical for maintaining its market position and compliance.

The critical business operation selected for this analysis is Amazon’s order fulfillment process. This operation involves receiving, processing, and delivering customer orders efficiently. To support this operation, Amazon relies on advanced logistics management software, warehouses equipped with robotic systems and human personnel, delivery trucks, and cloud infrastructure for data processing and storage. The maximum allowable outage time for this function is considered 2 hours, as any disruption longer than this could result in delayed shipments, customer dissatisfaction, or potential contractual penalties with suppliers and partners.

The inputs for Amazon’s order fulfillment process include customer purchase data and inventory status. Customer purchase data (input 1) consists of order details such as product type, quantity, and delivery address, which are processed through Amazon’s order management system. Inventory status (input 2) provides real-time stock levels essential for order processing and is maintained via warehouse management software. Outputs include the shipped orders and delivery confirmations—products dispatched to customers and proof of delivery. Dependencies include supply chain partners, delivery services, and warehouse robotic systems.

Regulatory laws that could be impacted if the operation becomes inoperable encompass the Federal Trade Commission (FTC) regulations concerning consumer protection, which require timely delivery and accurate transaction records, and customs laws for international shipments. Violating these could lead to fines or sanctions. For example, if delivery commitments are unmet, Amazon might breach contractual obligations outlined in the Consumer Protection Act, affecting customer trust and leading to legal repercussions.

In case the primary order fulfillment operation becomes inoperable, a feasible temporary solution is manual processing combined with outsourced courier services. This involves temporarily shifting order management to manual input and utilizing third-party logistics providers to handle deliveries. The benefit of this alternative is the continuation of order processing, reducing customer disruptions and maintaining revenue flow. However, disadvantages include increased operational costs, higher error rates, and potential delays due to less automation and coordination challenges. This solution would require rapid deployment of manual workflows and contractual agreements with third-party logistics providers to ensure continuity during system outages.

References

  • Barth, P., & Schulte, T. (2020). Business Impact Analysis: Building a Foundation for Business Continuity Planning. Journal of Business Continuity & Emergency Planning, 14(3), 237-249.
  • Disterer, G. (2013). ISO 27001, ISO 27002 and ISO 27031: Information Security Management Standards. Journal of Information Privacy and Security, 9(2), 83-92.
  • Lindley, J., & Cheung, W. (2018). Disaster Recovery and Business Continuity Planning. Wiley Finance Series.
  • Mannan, M. (2020). Cloud Computing Security: Foundations and Practice. CRC Press.
  • National Institute of Standards and Technology. (2012). Framework for Improving Critical Infrastructure Cybersecurity. NIST Special Publication 800-53 Rev. 4.
  • Patel, C., & Wainwright, D. (2019). Supply Chain Resilience and Business Continuity Management. Journal of Logistics, 19(2), 45-59.
  • Rittinghouse, J., & Ransome, J. (2016). Cloud Computing: Implementation, Management, and Security. CRC Press.
  • Stoneburner, G., Goguen, A., & Feringa, A. (2002). Risk Management Guide for Information Technology Systems. NIST SP 800-30.
  • United States Congress. (1990). The Americans with Disabilities Act of 1990. Pub. L. No. 101-336.
  • Williams, P., & Williams, M. (2019). Strategic Risk Management. Routledge.

Related Assignments