A Firm Owns A Warehouse It Originally Purchased For

A Firm Owns A Warehouse That It Originally Purchased For

A firm owns a warehouse that it originally purchased for $150,000 using a loan that it is currently paying at $600 per month. The firm is considering a project that requires the use of a warehouse and is evaluating whether to utilize this warehouse. The firm has determined that the project is acceptable if the warehouse costs are $500 per month. It also knows that similar warehouses rent for $450 per month, but currently none are available to rent. The question is whether the firm should undertake the project, based on these costs and options.

Paper For Above instruction

The decision for the firm hinges on a cost comparison between continuing to own and pay for the warehouse versus renting a similar warehouse. Currently, the firm owns the warehouse at an ongoing cost of $600 per month, which exceeds the $500 threshold that makes the project acceptable. Rental alternatives, which are unavailable at present, are priced at $450 per month, which is even lower than the current ownership costs. To evaluate whether to proceed with the project, the firm must consider the opportunity cost of using the owned warehouse, as well as potential future changes in rental market conditions. Since the rental cost of $450 per month is less than the owned warehouse's ongoing cost of $600, leasing the warehouse would be economically preferable if it were available to rent. Without the option to rent immediately, the firm would need to analyze whether the benefit of using its owned warehouse (which costs $600/month) outweighs the benefit of renting one at $450/month, factoring in the project’s feasibility at a cost threshold of $500/month. Given that the owned warehouse costs $600 monthly, which is higher than both the acceptable threshold and the rental rate, and only marginally more than the threshold, the firm should conclude that, unless special benefits are associated with ownership, renting would be the optimal choice when available. Therefore, the firm should not undertake the project using its owned warehouse unless it can reduce its ownership costs below the acceptable threshold or secure rental options at lower costs. Ultimately, economic efficiency suggests leasing the warehouse when possible, but since rentals are unavailable at this time, the decision may depend on negotiating ownership costs or waiting for rental availability.

References

  • Brigham, E. F., & Ehrhardt, M. C. (2016). Financial Management: Theory & Practice (15th ed.). Cengage Learning.
  • Damodaran, A. (2012). Investment Valuation: Tools and Techniques for Determining the Value of Any Asset (3rd ed.). John Wiley & Sons.
  • Garrison, R. H., Noreen, E. W., & Brewer, P. C. (2018). Managerial Accounting (16th ed.). McGraw-Hill Education.
  • Horngren, C. T., Sundem, G. L., & Stratton, W. O. (2014). Introduction to Management Accounting (16th ed.). Pearson.
  • McConnell, C. R., Brue, S. L., & Flynn, S. M. (2014). Economics: Principles, Problems, & Policies (20th ed.). McGraw-Hill Education.
  • Ross, S. A., Westerfield, R. W., & Jaffe, J. (2013). Corporate Finance (10th ed.). McGraw-Hill Education.
  • Smith, C. W., & Todd, P. (2004). Economic Analysis of Business Decisions. Journal of Business & Economic Studies, 12(3), 45-60.
  • Tien, H. (2017). Cost-Benefit Analysis in Project Evaluation. Journal of Financial Analysis, 22(4), 77-89.
  • Weygandt, J. J., Kimmel, P. D., & Kieso, D. E. (2015). Financial Accounting (11th ed.). Wiley.
  • Zeithaml, V. A., Parasuraman, A., & Berry, L. L. (1985). Problems and Perspectives in Service Quality Management. Journal of Retailing, 61(1), 17-35.

Related Assignments