Consider The Following Firms And Organizations

Consider The Following Firms Andor Organizations Consider The

Analyze a list of firms and organizations by ordering them from most competitive to least competitive, providing a brief justification for each. Justifications should consider the nature of their markets, including factors such as market structure, barriers to entry, number of competitors, product differentiation, and market power. For example, sports leagues like Major League Baseball and the NFL operate as monopolistic entities within their respective markets due to exclusive rights and franchise agreements, whereas organizations like the American Medical Association are professional associations with influence but not direct market competition. Retail chains like Trader Joe's compete within the grocery industry with multiple rivals, whereas utility companies like Southern California Edison are often regulated monopolies with significant market power but limited competition. Educational providers like Pomona College compete within the higher education sector, which features varying degrees of competitiveness depending on reputation and selectivity. Additionally, consider how the nature of each firm’s product or service and regulatory environment shape their market competitiveness.

Furthermore, explain why the normal rate of return for firms is typically considered to be zero in economic analyses. This concept is grounded in the idea that, in the long run, firms in perfectly competitive markets earn just enough revenue to cover all opportunity costs, including normal profit, leading to zero economic profit. This equilibrium reflects the absence of incentives for new firms to enter or existing firms to exit the market, as economic profit is zero, aligning with the idea that the market has fully adjusted. This state is regarded as the predicted long-run outcome for all firms operating in perfectly competitive and monopolistically competitive markets due to the free entry and exit mechanisms that drive profits to this equilibrium level.

Next, illustrate with a graph why the profit-maximizing level of output where marginal revenue equals marginal cost (MR=MC), especially when the marginal cost (MC) curve is increasing. The graph should display the downward sloping demand curve, the marginal revenue curve, and the marginal cost curve rising from left to right. The profit-maximizing quantity occurs at the intersection of MR and MC. Since MC is increasing, it ensures that this point is the maximum profit point. The explanation should clarify that at this point, the additional revenue gained from selling one more unit equals the additional cost, and beyond this point, producing more would decrease profit because MC would surpass MR.

In the scenario involving Bob, Bill, Ben, and Brad Baxter, they are considering setting a price for their download film as a single-price monopolist. The demand schedule provides the relationship between the price and quantity demanded. To analyze this, calculate total revenue (TR) as price times quantity and marginal revenue (MR) based on TR changes for each level of output. For each scenario, focus on identifying the price that maximizes individual objectives—whether it’s total downloads, total revenue, profit, or efficiency.

Paper For Above instruction

Analyzing the competitiveness of various organizations within their respective markets involves understanding the structural characteristics that define their market power and competition level. Starting with Major League Baseball (MLB) and the National Football League (NFL), these organizations operate as monopolies within their markets due to exclusive licensing rights, franchising, and significant barriers to entry. For instance, Major League Baseball has a protected franchise system, limiting other baseball leagues from competing directly at the same level, which grants it considerable market power—making it least competitive among sports organizations. Similarly, the NFL dominates the professional football market in the United States through a combination of exclusive franchise rights, league-wide revenue sharing, and media agreements, further reducing competition.

Moving to the American Medical Association (AMA), this organization is a professional professional association representing medical practitioners and influencing health policies. While it influences healthcare practices and standards, it does not directly compete in a product market where consumer choices are directly impacted, thus features less market power than firms directly competing in goods or services. Therefore, it can be considered less competitive than retail chains or manufacturing firms.

In the retail sector, Trader Joe's is a specialized grocery chain that competes within the highly competitive grocery industry. With numerous competitors such as Whole Foods, Safeway, and local supermarkets, Trader Joe's faces fierce rivalry, justifying its position towards the more competitive end of the spectrum. Pomona College, as a higher education institution, competes in an environment where reputation, academic quality, and branding influence student choice. Although it faces competition from other colleges and universities, barriers such as accreditation and reputation create some market power, rendering it less competitive than retail chains.

Southern California Edison (SCE), as a utility company, operates within a regulated monopoly with limited competition due to the essential nature of its services and high barriers to entry—regulatory approval and infrastructure costs. These factors reduce the level of competition, positioning SCE closer to a monopolist, but with regulatory oversight, it differs from pure monopolies, rendering it less competitive than firms in free markets.

Student Tutors operate in an educational services market with many providers, including private tutors, online platforms, and educational institutions. As a small service provider, they face less market power and high competition, placing them among the more competitive organizations on the list. Lastly, the ranking from most to least competitive would start with Student Tutors as highly competitive due to low barriers and many competitors, moving upward through Pomona College, Trader Joe's, Southern California Edison, AMA, NFL, and MLB, which exhibit increasing market power and less competition.

Regarding the normal rate of return, economic theory posits that in perfectly competitive markets, firms earn just enough revenue to cover their opportunity costs, including normal profit, resulting in an equilibrium where economic profit is zero. This occurs because free entry and exit in the market eliminate economic profits and losses in the long run, driving the rate of return to the level necessary to keep firms in business—hence, the normal rate of return is zero.

This outcome is predicated on the assumption that resources are perfectly mobile and markets are frictionless, ensuring that any supernormal profits attract new entrants, increasing supply and lowering prices until only normal profits remain, aligning with the long-run equilibrium state predicted for perfectly competitive and monopolistically competitive markets.

The graphical illustration showing why profit maximization occurs where MR=MC involves depicting the demand curve sloping downward, the corresponding MR curve beneath it, which is twice as steep, and the upward-sloping MC curve. The intersection point of MR and MC identifies the profit-maximizing output. When MC rises, the intersection is unique, and producing beyond this point would result in higher marginal costs than marginal revenue, reducing profits. Graphically, this emphasizes that firms optimize profit by producing at the output where MR equals MC when MC is increasing, maintaining the profit-maximizing condition.

In the case of the Baxter brothers' film, each brother's objectives influence their pricing strategy. The demand schedule allows calculation of total revenue by multiplying price by quantity at each level, and marginal revenue by analyzing the change in total revenue for incremental changes in quantity.

Bob seeks maximum downloads, so he prefers the lowest price that still incentivizes consumption. Typically, in a demand schedule, the lowest price yields the highest quantity demanded; hence, Bob would choose the lowest feasible price associated with the highest number of downloads. For instance, if the demand schedule shows a downward-sloping curve, the lowest price point gives the maximum downloads but may not generate maximum revenue or profit.

Bill aims to maximize total revenue, which occurs at the point on the demand curve where price times quantity is greatest. This involves analyzing the TR at different points; typically, total revenue peaks at a specific price-quantity combination where the slope of TR shifts from positive to negative.

Ben's objective is profit maximization, which requires analyzing where marginal revenue equals marginal cost (including the per-download fee), and the firm's profit is maximized at that point. They would choose a price corresponding to this equilibrium, often resulting in fewer downloads than the maximum but higher profit per download.

Brad's goal is to set the efficient, competitive price, generally equal to the marginal cost of distribution or the efficient price point, which leads to maximized total social welfare and the greatest number of downloads. Given the per-download fee, this price might be just above the fee, balancing affordability and coverage of costs.

References

• Begg, D., Fischer, S., & Dornbusch, R. (2020). Economics (12th ed.). McGraw-Hill Education.
• Frank, R. H., & Bernanke, B. S. (2019). Principles of Economics (7th ed.). McGraw-Hill Education.
• Mankiw, N. G. (2021). Principles of Economics (9th ed.). Cengage Learning.
• Pindyck, R. S., & Rubinfeld, D. L. (2018). Microeconomics (9th ed.). Pearson.
• Perloff, J. M. (2019). Microeconomics (9th ed.). Pearson.
• Varian, H. R. (2014). Intermediate Microeconomics: A Modern Approach (9th ed.). W.W. Norton & Company.
• Marshall, A. (2018). Principles of Economics. Routledge.
• Crandall, R. W. (2020). Regulatory Economics and Policy. MIT Press.
• Tirole, J. (2015). The Theory of Industrial Organization. MIT Press.
• Perkins, R., & Neumayer, E. (2019). Geographic economics and the competitiveness of firms. Journal of Economic Geography, 19(3), 423–448.