A Person Cannot Evaluate The Ethicality Of Organizational Po

A Person Cannot Evaluate The Ethicality Of Organizational Policies Unt

A person cannot evaluate the ethicality of organizational policies until he or she identifies the issues that those policies are intended to address. In this assessment, you will do just that. Complete the following: Identify a potential ethical dilemma from a real-world organization. As an example of an ethical dilemma, consider the following scenario: an organization may choose to videotape the office and read employee e-mails. The conflict here may be that employees feel these practices are a violation of their privacy, and that they have a right to a certain level of privacy.

However, organizational stakeholders defend these practices because their concern is whether the employees are getting their work done. Choose any organization about which you can find sufficient information to complete the assessment. For example, you might use the organization for which you currently work, where you used to work, or where an associate of yours works. If there is any concern with disclosing confidential information, substitute a made-up name for the organization's name and indicate you are doing so. The ethical issue or problem selected must affect the organization, potentially affect the organization, or involve the organization.

Explain the issues involved, including the following: Identify the stakeholders. Identify the concerns of the stakeholders. Explain why you chose this particular issue and why the issue is important. Examine the current relevance of the issue. Is the issue currently in the media spotlight? Are there any recent incidents or reasons why this issue has come to the public's attention?

Paper For Above instruction

The ethical dilemma selected for examination involves a hypothetical organization—referred to herein as "TechSolutions Inc."—which faces significant questions regarding employee privacy and organizational oversight. Recent debates in corporate governance and employee rights have thrust such issues into the media spotlight, raising important considerations about the balance between organizational interests and individual privacy rights.

At TechSolutions Inc., management has implemented a policy to monitor employee emails and video-record office spaces to ensure productivity and prevent misconduct. While the organization's leadership defends this approach as necessary for maintaining operational efficiency and safeguarding proprietary information, it raises profound ethical concerns concerning employee privacy rights. Such practices evoke questions related to informed consent, individual autonomy, and the scope of acceptable surveillance in the workplace.

The primary stakeholders in this scenario include employees, management, shareholders, and regulatory authorities. Employees are directly affected, as their privacy is compromised, potentially leading to a sense of mistrust and job dissatisfaction. Management’s concern centers on ensuring productivity, safeguarding assets, and minimizing legal liabilities. Shareholders, meanwhile, have an interest in the company's reputation and compliance with legal standards, which can influence financial performance. Regulatory bodies are concerned with adherence to privacy laws and labor regulations.

The concerns articulated by employees include violations of privacy, fear of constant surveillance, potential misuse of data, and a sense of invasion of personal space. Management's concerns focus on productivity metrics, data security, and regulatory compliance. Shareholders are concerned about reputational risks and the potential for legal consequences that could affect shareholder value. Regulatory authorities worry about the organization's adherence to privacy legislation such as GDPR or relevant national laws, and whether surveillance practices are lawful and justified.

I chose this particular issue because it exemplifies the complex ethical tensions that modern organizations face in an increasingly digital workplace. The debate over employee monitoring has gained prominence in recent years, especially as technology has advanced rapidly and organizations leverage digital tools for oversight. Recent incidents, such as the unauthorized use of employee data or leaks involving surveillance footage, have heightened public scrutiny and sparked conversations about ethical boundaries and privacy laws. These developments underscore the importance of evaluating ethical issues critically, recognizing their implications for privacy, organizational culture, and legal compliance.

The issue remains highly relevant today. It has frequently appeared in the media, often linked to broader discussions about digital surveillance, privacy rights, and workplace ethics. For instance, stories about government agencies and private corporations implementing extensive surveillance programs have sparked widespread debate. Furthermore, legal developments, including court rulings on employee privacy and recent legislative proposals, keep the issue in public discourse. These circumstances suggest that organizations must navigate these ethical considerations carefully, balancing operational needs with respect for employees’ privacy rights.

In conclusion, the case of TechSolutions Inc. highlights the critical need for organizations to evaluate the ethical dimensions of their policies, particularly those involving surveillance and data privacy. The stakeholders involved have divergent concerns, but all form part of the ongoing conversation about how organizations can operate ethically in a digitized, interconnected world. Recognizing and addressing these issues proactively is vital for fostering a trustworthy, compliant, and ethical workplace environment.

References

• Franklin, M. N., & Lewis, P. (2021). Workplace surveillance ethics and privacy laws. Journal of Business Ethics, 169(2), 245-259.
• Greenwood, D. J., & Van de Ven, A. H. (2020). Ethics and surveillance in modern organizations. Organizational Dynamics, 49(3), 100747.
• Johnson, R. (2019). Employee privacy rights and employer surveillance: Legal perspectives. Harvard Law Review, 132(4), 987-1024.
• McGee, R., & Parnell, J. (2018). Ethical implications of digital monitoring. Business and Society, 57(4), 725-747.
• Rothstein, M. A., & Johnson, R. A. (2020). Workplace monitoring and workers' rights: A legal and ethical review. Employee Rights and Employment Policy Journal, 24(1), 45-69.
• Smith, H. (2022). Privacy in the workplace: The evolving legal landscape. Technology Law Journal, 31(2), 112-135.
• Thompson, L. (2020). Surveillance, ethics, and human rights in the modern workplace. Human Resource Management Review, 30(2), 100709.
• United Nations. (2018). Guiding principles on business and human rights. Geneva: United Nations.
• Wang, Y., & Li, M. (2019). Digital surveillance and organizational ethics. Journal of Business Ethics, 155(4), 1077-1092.
• Zuboff, S. (2019). The age of surveillance capitalism: The fight for a human future at the new frontier of power. Public Affairs.