Last Person Took Down Payment And Did Not Complete My Homewo

Last Person Took Down Payment And Did Not Complete My Homework And Now

This assignment builds on the work completed in Unit 3 (IP 1A) and requires developing sections IV, V, and VI. Students must compile their work from Units 3 and 4 into a single document, including a cover page, reference page, and table of contents.

Section IV: Describe the international influences on logistics and considerations for managing an international supply chain. Evaluate the opportunities presented by going international and identify the risks involved with international considerations in the scenario.

Section V: Complete the provided Excel spreadsheet with all calculations related to logistics and supply chain decisions. Attach the completed table to the paper, either in an appendix or as a separate file. Discuss your findings in detail, considering the product specifications, shipping costs, and supply chain constraints provided.

Additional data includes: environmentally insulated coolers, each occupying 2 cubic feet of trailer space, with trailers measuring 10 x 10 x 40 feet, costing $1,000 to ship West Coast from the East Coast. The added freight cost per finished unit for West Coast manufacturing is $0.20, $0.20, and $0.60 respectively. The West Coast retailer orders 10,000 units weekly in 1,000-unit lots, with raw materials supplied only from the East Coast, representing 20% of raw material costs. The company currently freight-equalizes customer shipping charges to remain competitive, charging $200 per delivery for small orders.

Section VI: Conclude with a 200-word summary of your analysis, highlighting your recommended course of action and key points for the CEO. Emphasize the strategic implications of international logistics, costs, and sourcing options discussed throughout the paper.

Paper For Above instruction

The globalization of supply chains has significantly influenced logistics, shaping how companies manage international operations and streamline their processes to meet diverse market demands. Key international influences include variations in tariffs, customs procedures, transportation infrastructure, and regulatory compliance, all of which impact the efficiency and cost structure of supply chains (Christopher, 2016). Managing such complexities requires a sophisticated understanding of cross-border regulations, currency fluctuations, and geopolitical considerations, which can both present opportunities and pose risks for firms expanding internationally.

Opportunities inherent in international logistics include access to broader markets, cost efficiencies from global sourcing, and the potential for competitive advantages through differentiated supply chain strategies. For instance, establishing manufacturing or sourcing facilities closer to emerging markets can reduce lead times and transportation costs (Cavusgil et al., 2014). However, extending supply chains internationally introduces risks such as political instability, exchange rate volatility, longer lead times, and compliance challenges, which can disrupt operations and increase costs (Morrell & Warner, 2017).

In the specific scenario of manufacturing insulated coolers, international considerations involve evaluating the cost implications of shipping raw materials and finished goods across borders. The product's bulky nature and transportation costs—$0.20, $0.20, and $0.60 per unit for shipping from East Coast to West Coast—must be balanced against potential benefits. The current model utilizes U.S.-based raw material suppliers, with shipping costs representing about 20% of raw material costs. Moving production closer to the West Coast could reduce logistics costs and lead times, but it requires analyzing freight expenses and supplier proximity.

Sourcing plays a pivotal role in influencing logistics efficiencies. Domestic sourcing ensures more control over quality and lead times but might be costlier than international options, especially if emerging markets can offer lower raw material costs. Conversely, international sourcing might reduce raw material costs but introduce risks such as longer lead times and increased complexity in customs and compliance (Harrison & Van Hoek, 2017). Sourcing decisions must consider total landed costs, including transportation, tariffs, and inventory holding expenses, to determine viability.

In this scenario, evaluating whether to keep manufacturing domestic or to outsource internationally involves analyzing trade-offs between cost savings and logistical risks. While international sourcing offers cost advantages, it also exposes the company to potential disruptions, especially given the bulkiness of the product and the importance of maintaining stable supply lines. Sourcing locally or regionally might be more reliable despite higher raw material costs, thus ensuring consistent delivery schedules and minimizing supply chain risks (Coyle et al., 2016).

Cost analysis highlights that freight costs are a critical factor, especially considering the bulk and weight of the coolers. The added freight costs of $0.20 and $0.60 per unit for the West Coast are significant and could be mitigated through alternative sourcing or manufacturing strategies, such as domestic production consolidation or regional warehouses. Additionally, the company's practice of freight-equalizing customer charges influences profit margins and competitive positioning, requiring careful financial modeling and strategic trade-offs.

From an operational standpoint, the company should consider the implications of expanding its international footprint versus optimizing domestic logistics. While international expansion can unlock new markets and cost efficiencies, it also requires substantial investment in compliance infrastructure, risk mitigation, and supply chain visibility tools. Domestic sourcing and manufacturing, on the other hand, offer more control, reduced risk of disruption, and better responsiveness to market fluctuations, which are vital for products with high weight and volume like coolers.

In conclusion, after evaluating the international influences, costs, and risks, my recommendation is for the company to prioritize domestic manufacturing and sourcing strategies while exploring regional supply chain enhancements. This approach minimizes risks associated with international logistics, maintains control over quality and lead times, and allows flexible response to market demands. The decision should align with a comprehensive cost-benefit analysis, considering transportation costs, supply chain reliability, and customer service levels. The CEO should understand that strategic sourcing decisions are critical for sustainability, cost management, and competitive advantage in a globalized yet complex supply environment.

References

• Christopher, M. (2016). Logistics & Supply Chain Management. Pearson UK.
• Cavusgil, S. T., Knight, G., Riesenberger, J. R., Rammal, H. G., & Rose, E. L. (2014). International Business. Pearson.
• Morrell, P. S., & Warner, R. M. (2017). International Logistics. Routledge.
• Harrison, A., & Van Hoek, R. (2017). Logistics Management and Strategy. Pearson.
• Coyle, J. J., Langley, C. J., Novack, R. A., & Gibson, B. J. (2016). Supply Chain Management: A Logistics Perspective. Cengage Learning.
• Ballou, R. H. (2004). Business Logistics/Supply Chain Management. Pearson Education.
• Rushton, A., Croucher, P., & Baker, P. (2014). The Handbook of Logistics and Supply Chain Management. Kogan Page.
• Simchi-Levi, D., Kaminsky, P., & Simchi-Levi, E. (2008). Designing and Managing the Supply Chain. McGraw-Hill.
• Lee, H. L., & Billington, C. (1992). Managing Supply Chain Inventory: Pitfalls and Opportunities. Sloan Management Review, 33(3), 65-73.
• Tan, K. C., Kannan, V. R., & Handfield, R. (2017). Supply Chain Integration and Performance: The Role of Collaboration, Trust, and Technology. Journal of Business Logistics, 38(2), 150-162.