A Quaint But Well-Established Coffee Shop The Hot New 736799

A Quaint But Well Established Coffee Shop The Hot New Cafe Wants To

A quaint but well-established coffee shop, the Hot New Cafe, plans to build a new cafe to increase its capacity. The project involves an initial investment in building costs, expected revenue, operating costs, depreciation, and tax considerations. The assignment requires developing a comprehensive capital budget that includes net cash flows over five years, calculating the payback period and net present value (NPV) of the project, and analyzing whether the project should be accepted based on these financial metrics. Additionally, the assignment involves defining and describing key terms such as capital budgeting, NPV, and payback period, and making recommendations based on the financial analysis.

Paper For Above instruction

Capital budgeting is a critical financial management process that involves evaluating potential investment projects to determine their value and viability. In the context of the Hot New Cafe’s expansion, capital budgeting entails assessing the initial costs, expected cash inflows, operational expenses, and tax implications to establish whether the project aligns with the company’s strategic and financial goals. This process ensures that resources are allocated efficiently and that capital is invested in projects offering the highest potential return (Brealey, Myers, & Allen, 2020).

The project under consideration involves constructing a new cafe at a total cost of $750,000, which will be depreciated straight-line over five years. The cafe anticipates annual sales of $800,000, with direct costs, including labor and materials, constituting 50% of sales. Indirect costs are estimated at $100,000 annually. The firm’s marginal tax rate is 37%, and its cost of capital is 12%. The goal is to develop a detailed capital budget, calculate the net cash flows, and evaluate the project's financial viability using the payback period and NPV metrics.

Development of the Capital Budget

The first step involves calculating the annual revenues, costs, depreciation, and taxable income to derive the net cash flows for each year. The annual depreciation expense for the building is calculated as:

• Depreciation Expense = Building Cost / Useful Life = $750,000 / 5 = $150,000

Annual sales are $800,000, with direct costs at 50%, amounting to $400,000. Indirect costs are fixed at $100,000. The gross profit before depreciation and taxes is thus:

Gross Profit = Sales - Direct Costs - Indirect Costs = $800,000 - $400,000 - $100,000 = $300,000

Subtracting depreciation, taxable income is:

Taxable Income = Gross Profit - Depreciation = $300,000 - $150,000 = $150,000

The taxes owed are:

Tax = Taxable Income × Tax Rate = $150,000 × 37% = $55,500

Net Income after taxes is:

Net Income = Taxable Income - Taxes = $150,000 - $55,500 = $94,500

Adding back depreciation (a non-cash expense) gives the cash flow:

Net Cash Flow = Net Income + Depreciation = $94,500 + $150,000 = $244,500

This calculation assumes all operational cash flows are consistent across years, given the stable sales projection. For the five-year period, the net cash flows are therefore $244,500 annually.

Calculating the Payback Period (P/P)

The payback period measures the time required for the initial investment to be recovered from the project's cash inflows. The initial investment included the building cost of $750,000. The annual net cash flow is estimated at $244,500, so the payback period is:

Payback Period = Initial Investment / Annual Cash Flow = $750,000 / $244,500 ≈ 3.07 years

Since the company's policy states that projects with a payback period exceeding three years are not acceptable, this project narrowly exceeds the limit. Therefore, based on the payback policy, the project does not meet the company's criteria for acceptance.

Calculating the Net Present Value (NPV)

The NPV considers the time value of money by discounting future cash flows at the company’s required rate of return (cost of capital). The formula for NPV is:

• NPV = ∑ (Cash Flow in Year t) / (1 + r)^t - Initial Investment

Where r is the discount rate of 12%. Using this, the present value of the annuity of net cash flows over five years is calculated as follows:

Present Value of Annuity = Cash Flow × [(1 - (1 + r)^-n) / r] = $244,500 × [(1 - (1 + 0.12)^-5) / 0.12]

Calculating the denominator: (1 + 0.12)^-5 ≈ 0.5674

Thus, the annuity factor is: [(1 - 0.5674) / 0.12] ≈ 3.615

Present Value of cash flows = $244,500 × 3.615 ≈ $883,297.50

Subtracting the initial investment gives:

NPV = $883,297.50 - $750,000 = $133,297.50

The positive NPV indicates the project is expected to generate value beyond the cost of capital, favoring acceptance from a financial perspective.

Analysis and Recommendations

Based on the calculations, the project’s payback period of approximately 3.07 years slightly exceeds the company's policy threshold of 3 years. Despite the positive NPV of about $133,298, indicating that the project is financially attractive and should theoretically add value, the payback period policy would suggest rejection.

From a financial standpoint, the project’s profitability and value creation outweigh the payback concern. However, decision-makers must consider their risk appetite and strategic priorities. If the company emphasizes quick recoveries of investment, they might reject this project. Conversely, if long-term profitability and growth are prioritized, the positive NPV supports moving forward.

In conclusion, although the project offers substantial financial benefits as evidenced by a positive NPV, its payback period slightly exceeds the company’s policy limit. Therefore, the organization must weigh the importance of cash flow recovery against potential value creation. Given the strong cash flow generation and positive NPV, a decision to proceed could be justified if strategic factors and risk considerations align with the financial outlook. Ultimately, consistent with best practices in capital budgeting, pursuing projects with positive NPVs is advisable, provided managerial risk tolerance permits exceeding payback thresholds.

References

• Brealey, R. A., Myers, S. C., & Allen, F. (2020). Principles of Corporate Finance (13th ed.). McGraw-Hill Education.
• Brigham, E. F., & Ehrhardt, M. C. (2019). Financial Management: Theory & Practice (16th ed.). Cengage Learning.
• Ross, S. A., Westerfield, R. W., & Jaffe, J. (2019). Corporate Finance (12th ed.). McGraw-Hill Education.
• Damodaran, A. (2012). Investment Valuation: Tools and Techniques for Determining the Value of Any Asset (2nd ed.). Wiley Finance.
• Gitman, L. J., & Zutter, C. J. (2019). Principles of Managerial Finance (15th ed.). Pearson Education.
• Higgins, R. C. (2018). Analysis for Financial Management (11th ed.). McGraw-Hill Education.
• Ross, S., & Allen, R. (2020). Corporate Finance: The Core. McGraw-Hill Education.
• Keown, A. J., Martin, J. D., & Petty, J. W. (2017). Financial Management: Principles and Practice. Pearson.
• Pyke, A. J., Chamberlain, D., & Martinez, D. (2015). Managerial Finance. McGraw-Hill Education.
• Brigham, E. F., & Houston, J. F. (2019). Fundamentals of Financial Management (15th ed.). Cengage Learning.