A Summary Of The Structure And Process Title 10

A Summary Of The Structure And Process1title 10the Title Is A Br

A Summary Of The Structure And Process1title 10the Title Is A Br

A Summary of The Structure and Process

1. Title (10%) The title is a brief indication of what is to be expected.

2. Abstract (20%) The abstract describes the entire paper or project with an emphasis on that which is most important. (Typically 1-2 paragraphs or approximately words)

3. Introduction (20%)

  • a. A description of the purpose of the study
  • b. A clearly defined research question (if not empirical, topic may not have IV/DV. Skip to step E)
  • c. Clearly defined central concepts
  • d. Include clear measurable objectives (if needed, topic may not have IV/DV)
  • e. A discussion of what has been done prior to the proposed problem
  • f. A discussion of what one plans to do
  • g. Describe the source of the idea
  • h. Explain why this study is important (Typically, 2-4 paragraphs or approximately words) Highlighted= required.

4. Literature Review (40%)

  • a. An in-depth review of previous work
  • b. Include several articles of the last five years (not all have to be in last 5 yrs, but at least some need to be)
  • c. The recent articles can be supplemented with recent scholarly books and articles, but also older literature on a sparingly basis. (Refrain from textbooks or sensationalism literature) (Chapters from books can be used as well but refrain from using textbooks, encyclopedias and dictionaries)
  • d. Provide a logical sequence from what is known to what remains unanswered (8-10 sources is considered appropriate with about one paragraph each; special note read at least 3 of the articles entirely; and 1 chapter from a book entirely; 8-10 paragraphs is roughly words or 4-5 pages double spaced)

5. Theoretical Framework (10%)

  • a. Provide a theory or theoretical framework that informs the literature review.
  • b. The same theory should also inform the research process. (what type of theories or theoretical framework add to what your topic is or explains what your topic is about) ex: if your topic is the impression that crime is getting worse then you might want to look at labeling theories. Think of classical conditioning and how does it explain what you have… or social strains or differential ???) (approximately 1-2 paragraphs less, words)

Paper For Above instruction

Title: A Comprehensive Guide to Structuring and Conducting a Research Paper

The creation of a well-structured research paper involves meticulous planning and organization. The first component, the title, succinctly indicates the focus of the study, setting the stage for the reader. Following this, the abstract summarizes the entire work concisely, highlighting the most critical aspects of the research. An effective abstract captures the essence of the study in 1-2 paragraphs, providing a snapshot that encourages further reading.

The introduction serves as the foundation of the paper, detailing the purpose of the study and articulating a clear research question. When applicable, the research question guides the formulation of hypotheses and design. The introduction also defines central concepts with clarity and establishes measurable objectives, which are essential for evaluating the success of the research. Additionally, this section discusses prior work related to the topic, establishing context and identifying gaps that the current study aims to address. The researcher must also explain the origin of the idea and justify the importance of the study, emphasizing its relevance and potential contribution to the field.

The literature review forms the backbone of the academic argument, providing an in-depth analysis of previous research. Recent articles from the last five years are prioritized to ensure the study reflects current knowledge, supplemented by scholarly books and older literature sparingly. Rather than relying on textbooks or sensationalism, the review should synthesize 8-10 sources with logical coherence, progressing from what is known to what remains unresolved. Reading entire articles and chapters enhances depth, ensuring a comprehensive understanding of the field. This process helps identify theoretical gaps and informs the theoretical framework.

The theoretical framework functions as the conceptual lens through which the research is interpreted. It should be directly informed by the literature review, elaborating on theories that explain the phenomena under investigation. For instance, if examining crime perception, labeling theory may serve as a guiding framework. Classical conditioning, social strain, or differential association theories could also be relevant, depending on the research focus. The framework must be integrated into all aspects of the study, providing coherence and justification for methodological choices. Typically, this section does not exceed two paragraphs but should be sufficiently detailed to underpin the entire research process.

Overall, a comprehensive research paper demands clarity, coherence, and critical engagement with existing scholarship. Each section builds upon the previous, culminating in a well-justified, logically structured document that advances understanding in the chosen field of study.

References

  • Booth, W. C., Colomb, G. G., & Williams, J. M. (2008). The craft of research. University of Chicago Press.
  • Creswell, J. W. (2014). Research design: Qualitative, quantitative, and mixed methods approaches. Sage publications.
  • Hart, C. (1998). Doing a literature review: Releasing the social science research imagination. Sage.
  • Leedy, P. D., & Ormrod, J. E. (2015). Practical research: Planning and design. Pearson.
  • Locke, L. F., Spirduso, W. W., & Silverman, S. J. (2013). Proposals that work: A guide for planning dissertations and grant proposals. Sage.
  • Booth, W. C., Colomb, G. G., & Williams, J. M. (2008). The craft of research. University of Chicago Press.
  • Creswell, J. W. (2014). Research design: Qualitative, quantitative, and mixed methods approaches. Sage publications.
  • Hart, C. (1998). Doing a literature review: Releasing the social science research imagination. Sage.
  • Leedy, P. D., & Ormrod, J. E. (2015). Practical research: Planning and design. Pearson.
  • Locke, L. F., Spirduso, W. W., & Silverman, S. J. (2013). Proposals that work: A guide for planning dissertations and grant proposals. Sage.