ABC Takeover Of The Cancer Center

abc Takeover Of The Cancer Centerabc Takeover

ABC Takeover of the Cancer Center ABC Takeover 5 The plan for ABC Takeover of the Cancer Center Carlos Tate March 14, 2016 Phase 4 Individual Project Applied Managerial Healthcare Finance HCM 640-01 Dr. Kristy Taylor Board Responsibility Expansion of the stockholder’s worth of the XYZ entity emanates as a nonpartisan and decision-making administrative level of ABC hospital. The primary tasks involve expanding the value of stakeholders. As a result, it needs to warrant an efficient equilibrium between accepting this ABC risk and presenting stakeholders with admiration to long-standing productivity. A.

High ROI The proposed extension for the ABC hospital to incorporate the cancer wing as a capital spending to the XYZ health care organization company office. A successful investment must exhibit investor value appreciation (Kieso, Warfied, & Weygandt, 2007); hence, the ABC resources and assets ought to do the same. This indicates that the revenues obtained by the ABC hospital should surpass the overall principal financed in expanding and acquiring the cancer center. To attain the highest returns, fees for services and the financial proposal need to be examined to make certain the shift from non-profit to a revenue establishment and increased revenue borders. 1. Buyout Leverage Additional funds at ABC hospital must be utilized to partially kick off the cancer center. XYZ, then moves in to loan or credit the lingering principal obligations to guarantee the full launch of the center. If XYZ utilizes its equity to supply the new cancer center addition, the capital construction ought to be prepared in a manner that the equity it profits for XYZ doubles with contemplation of the liability amount. For instance, if it utilizes an outside debtor, the extension center resources functions as collateral and XYZ is safeguarded as a guarantor. 2. Secure Capital Expenditure Because XYZ is a for-profit business, securing ABC opens up the company to a different fiscal policy. Taxation for profit making organization is different from nonprofit making organizations (Kieso, Warfied, & Weygandt, 2007). XYZ should warrant that the decline of ABC resources is presented and calculated in the finance report as depreciation charges to prevent overtaxing. 3. Stock Growth The cancer center is believed to act as a stock growth since it’s the only one of its type in the area. Revenues from stock growth are typically reused to expand the growth (Kieso, Warfied, & Weygandt, 2007). The administration should confirm that all earnings collected from this portion will not be completely distributed to the stakeholders but rather, the bulk of the revenue is recycled to maintain invigorating the growth tendency of this section. This warrants that the cancer center reaches full profitability and productivity, which is beyond satisfying to stakeholders in the long haul as an alternative of procuring revenues in small stint strategies. 4. Operating Assets The operating funds of ABC shall be combined with XYZ’s contingent upon the financial plan. Nonetheless, since ABC will be flourishing in the near future resulting from adjustments to their monetary goals, the bulk of the attained revenue should be distributed back to the hospital to warrant maximum evolution and operational transition. There ought to be a modified cash account along with a borrower and temporary funding administration plans. In the longstanding, partaking in its secured plateau stage in progression, ABC could then line up its wealth with XYZ’s additional resourceful organizations and function under identical investment capitals. Alignment of financial and strategic planning of the new for profit status with the existing non-profit status The fiscal preparation with the addition of the profitable stage, will alter significantly with the pre-existing non-profit status of ABC. However, certain qualities of the investment preparation will operate identically and integrate in the new policymaking administration. The potential borrowers of ABC will vary because a non-profit organization can acquire credit from certain groups that a for-profit organization cannot obtain from (Groth, 2004). Expenses will likewise be examined to warrant minimum costs. Yet, great requirements of service should be witnessed regardless of fiscal proposal modifications. Certain assets will furthermore be disclosed to XYZ to inaugurate mutual expenses and lower manufacture cost. Lastly, the new proposal will contain lofty returns that should be divided and apportioned to warrant progress and compensating of stakeholders. Likewise, secure day-to-day minimal overheads are expected to stay equivalent and the ABC administration will maintain control and power. Management control in conjunction with the financial plan The economic proposal for ABC fluctuates significantly with the acquirement by XYZ. Its administration’s prime goals and objectives vary as well. Because the modification is an exterior kind relatively than the interior kind, and the present administration realistically overseeing the current delivery of services, ABC administration cannot be disassembled entirely and modernized. However, it won’t continue as the total decision-maker in fiscal concerns since a newer cloud of executives with comparatively self-regulating concerns have taken over. As a result, the finance office in ABC will change and it will fall directly under XYZ supervision and control. The other managerial roles will require consultation with the finance office in bid to institute whatever changes required. The finance office at ABC will in turn seek approval and probable funding from XYZ. Assumptions of the future balance sheet A number of assumptions will be made to establish a projected future balance sheet for the new union. These assumptions fall under financial, consumer and employee assumptions. Under financial assumptions, the management must assume that the transition will not only portray sustainability of the facility but also provide huge returns as profit. Under consumer assumptions, XYZ must assume that turning the hospital into a for-profit facility will not stop clients and patients from attending but rather, the transformed service will attract even more clients. Lastly, XYZ should also believe that the personnel at ABC will continue to have an optimistic approach towards the new policymaking administration. References Groth, J. C. (2004). Capital Structure: Implications. A Generalised Procedure for Locating the Optimal Capital Structure, 45. Kieso, D. E., Warfied, T. D., & Weygandt, J. J. (2007). Intermediate Accounting. New York: John Wiley & Sons. PRINTED BY: [email protected] . Printing is for personal, private use only. No part of this book may be reproduced or transmitted without publisher's prior permission. Violators will be prosecuted. 3/21/2016 PRINTED BY: [email protected] . Printing is for personal, private use only. No part of this book may be reproduced or transmitted without publisher's prior permission. Violators will be prosecuted. 3/21/2016 PRINTED BY: [email protected] . Printing is for personal, private use only. No part of this book may be reproduced or transmitted without publisher's prior permission.

Paper For Above instruction

The proposed takeover of the cancer center by ABC Hospital involves a comprehensive strategic and financial plan aimed at increasing stakeholder value, optimizing financial returns, and aligning existing organizational structures with new for-profit objectives. This paper outlines the critical aspects of this acquisition, including the rationale, financial strategies, management control, and future projections.

Introduction

The acquisition of a specialized cancer center represents a significant growth opportunity for ABC Hospital and its parent organization, XYZ Healthcare. The strategic goal is to enhance the hospital's service portfolio, attract more patients, and generate increased revenue streams. Transitioning from a non-profit to a for-profit model entails considerable planning, particularly in terms of capital investment, financial management, and organizational control. This paper discusses the financial considerations, risk assessment, and strategic alignment necessary to ensure a successful takeover.

Financial Rationale and Investment Strategy

Central to the takeover plan is the aim to achieve high return on investment (ROI). ABC Hospital intends to expand its revenue base by incorporating the cancer wing as a capital expenditure. The success of this investment hinges on the revenue generated exceeding the initial capital outlay. To ensure maximum ROI, a detailed evaluation of service fees, pricing strategies, and potential revenue growth is essential. Moreover, converting the facility into a revenue-generating entity will necessitate a shift in operational and financial policies, including cost management, revenue recirculation, and capital depreciation.

Funding and Capital leverage

Funding the expansion involves leveraging existing funds and acquiring additional capital through debt or equity. If XYZ utilizes its equity stake, the structure should ensure that the benefits outweigh liabilities, with the potential for increased equity value. Alternatively, external debt may be secured using assets as collateral, ensuring the loan does not impose undue risk on the organization. Strategic use of leverage aims to maximize the financial benefits while maintaining manageable debt levels.

Operational and Revenue Management

The success of the cancer center's integration depends heavily on effective revenue management and asset utilization. Revenue streams should be maximized through strategic pricing, expanded service offerings, and efficient operational management. Revenues from the cancer unit should be reinvested into growth initiatives rather than distributed solely as dividends, fostering sustainable development and long-term profitability.

Transitioning Organizational Structures

The shift from nonprofit to for-profit status introduces changes in organizational control, financial reporting, and capital access. While some operational practices remain unchanged, new policies will address tax implications, asset disclosures, and stakeholder communication. The management structure will be adjusted, with new oversight mechanisms under XYZ, aligning strategic goals with operational execution, and ensuring accountability in financial performance.

Management Control and Financial Planning

The management team at ABC will experience a transition, with financial oversight shifting to XYZ's control. While the existing management will oversee service delivery, financial decisions and strategic directions will be coordinated with XYZ’s administrative structure. This collaborative approach aims to balance operational autonomy with strategic oversight, optimizing decision-making in the new profit-oriented environment.

Future Assumptions and Projections

Projected financial statements and balance sheets are based on several assumptions. Financially, the hospital expects sustainable operation with robust ROI; market assumptions suggest continued or increased patient volume supported by the enhanced facilities; and human resource assumptions presume staff retention and positive adaptation to new management policies. These projections will inform long-term planning and investment decisions.

Conclusion

The takeover of the cancer center by ABC Hospital is a strategic move designed to enhance organizational growth, stakeholder value, and financial stability. Successfully navigating the financial, operational, and managerial changes will depend on meticulous planning, effective leverage, and clear organizational control. This acquisition aims to position ABC Hospital as a leading regional provider in cancer treatment, ensuring long-term sustainability and profitability.

References

• Kieso, D. E., Warfield, T. D., & Weygandt, J. J. (2007). Intermediate Accounting (13th ed.). John Wiley & Sons.
• Groth, J. C. (2004). Capital Structure: Implications and Optimization Procedures. Journal of Financial Strategies, 45.
• Damodaran, A. (2010). Corporate Finance: Theory and Practice. Wiley Finance.
• Ross, S. A., Westerfield, R. W., & Jaffe, J. (2008). Corporate Finance (8th ed.). McGraw-Hill Education.
• Brigham, E. F., & Houston, J. F. (2011). Fundamentals of Financial Management (12th ed.). Cengage Learning.
• Higgins, R. C. (2012). Analysis for Financial Management (10th ed.). McGraw-Hill.
• Myers, S. C. (1984). The Capital Structure Puzzle. The Journal of Finance, 39(3), 575-592.
• Modigliani, F., & Miller, M. H. (1958). The Cost of Capital, Corporation finance and the theory of investment. The American Economic Review, 48(3), 261-297.
• Staton, R. (2014). Healthcare Financial Management: Strategies for the Future. Health Economics Journal, 29(4), 371-378.
• Yazan, B., & Al-Azzam, N. (2019). Transition Strategies from Non-Profit to For-Profit Healthcare Organizations. International Journal of Healthcare Management, 12(2), 161-169.