ACC 499 Discussion Questions 1: Defend The Current GAAP Rule

Acc 499 Discussion Questions1 Defend The Current Gaap Rules For Pensi

Acc 499 Discussion Questions 1. Defend the current GAAP rules for pension accounting reporting on the balance sheet and the income statement. Recommend a change you would make to the current pension accounting to more accurately reflect the future obligations of a company. 2. “Will it cost your company your company? Ready for one of the most difficult challenges ever to confront corporate America? One that is estimated to cost up to $400 billion. New FASB regulations will force companies to measure and post as a debit their health expense obligation to current and future retirees.... We’ll help you minimize the financial impact of these regulations and still enable you to remain responsive to the benefit needs of employees.” (Excerpts from an advertisement by CIGNA, a large insurance company.) “Forget about retiring with all-expenses-paid health care from your employer. About 65% of U.S. companies have reduced benefits. Some have asked retirees to pay more of the costs, while others have eliminated the plans altogether. Blame soaring medical expenses and a new accounting rule that requires companies to post long-term retiree medical benefits as liabilities on their balance sheets.” (Adapted from BusinessWeek, August 24, 1992, p. 39.) Evaluate the content of the advertisement and explain why companies may have reduced benefits when they adopted new GAAP. 3. Create a scenario where the external auditors detect that there is fraud. Discuss the auditors’ responsibilities for assessing fraud risk. What are the procedures used to detect material misstatements due to fraud? Discuss recommendations to management for reducing fraud. 4. Compare and contrast the different inventory cost flow assumptions. Explain the consequences that result from the use of alternative inventory cost flow assumptions. 5. Robin Smith is considering buying shares in Mah Company. The company has reported an increase in net income this year. On careful reading of the notes to the financial statements, Robin learns that the company had a LIFO liquidation this year. Robin understands what caused the liquidation but has asked you for advice about how to interpret it. Based on the information contained in Case C7-6: Interpretation of GAAP and Ethical Issues, could a LIFO liquidation profit create ethical issues? Defend your position.

Paper For Above instruction

Financial reporting plays a crucial role in providing transparency and accountability for companies, with pension accounting and inventory valuation being significant components of corporate financial statements. The current Generally Accepted Accounting Principles (GAAP) provide specific guidelines for reporting pension obligations, inventory costs, and revenue recognition, aiming to ensure consistency, comparability, and clarity. Nevertheless, these rules warrant ongoing evaluation to reflect the economic realities more accurately and to address ethical considerations effectively.

Defending Current GAAP Rules for Pension Accounting

GAAP mandates that companies report pension obligations on their balance sheets as liabilities at present value, recognizing the future benefits owed to employees. The income statement reflects pension expenses based on service costs, interest costs, and actuarial gains or losses, promoting transparency about the company’s pension commitments. This approach ensures that investors and stakeholders are aware of the company’s long-term obligations, facilitating more informed decision-making.

However, critics argue that the actuarial assumptions used to calculate pension liabilities—such as discount rates and employee turnover—are sometimes optimistic, potentially underestimating future obligations. To improve accuracy, a change could be to require more conservative assumptions or to disclose additional sensitivity analyses, illustrating how variations impact reported pension liabilities. Such modifications would provide a more comprehensive picture of the potential financial burden companies face regarding pension obligations.

Impact of New GAAP Regulations on Employee Benefits

The advertisement from CIGNA highlights a significant challenge firms encounter with new GAAP regulations that require companies to recognize long-term retiree medical benefits as liabilities. This requirement increases the visibility of future obligations, potentially leading companies to reduce or eliminate certain benefits to manage reported liabilities. The primary reason for benefits reductions is the pressure to present more manageable financial statements and avoid the perception of excessive liability. Additionally, as medical costs escalate, companies find it financially onerous to sustain previous benefit levels, especially when forced to record these obligations on their balance sheets.

This scenario illustrates how accounting standards, while intended to improve transparency, can influence corporate strategies, including benefit reductions. Companies may view the recognition of long-term obligations as an incentive to renegotiate terms or decrease benefit promises, balancing financial statements’ realism with operational feasibility.

Auditor Responsibilities and Fraud Detection

External auditors play a vital role in ensuring the integrity of financial statements by assessing the risk of material misstatement, whether due to error or fraud. Consider a scenario where auditors discover falsified revenue figures during an audit. Their responsibilities extend to evaluating the internal controls that could permit such fraud, assessing susceptibility to misstatement, and performing substantive procedures such as detailed transaction testing and forensic analysis. For instance, auditors might analyze revenue recognition policies and test supporting documentation to uncover irregularities.

To reduce the risk of fraud, auditors recommend management implement robust internal controls, including segregation of duties, regular reconciliations, and ethical training programs. Management should foster a corporate culture emphasizing ethical behavior and transparency, alongside establishing whistleblowing channels to detect misconduct early.

Inventory Cost Flow Assumptions and Their Implications

Inventory valuation depends on the chosen cost flow assumption—FIFO (First-In, First-Out), LIFO (Last-In, First-Out), or weighted average. FIFO assumes that oldest inventory is sold first, resulting in lower cost of goods sold during times of rising prices and higher ending inventory values, thereby increasing profit. Conversely, LIFO assumes the most recent inventory is sold first, matching recent costs against revenues and often decreasing taxable income and reported net income during inflationary periods.

Weighted average smooths out price fluctuations by averaging costs over all units available. The choice impacts financial metrics such as gross profit, net income, and inventory valuation, affecting managerial decisions and tax liabilities. For example, using LIFO can lead to higher tax deferrals but may also cause inventory liquidation, which can distort profitability metrics and trigger ethical concerns, as in Robin Smith’s case with Mah Company.

Interpreting LIFO Liquidation and Ethical Considerations

In Robin Smith’s scenario, the reported increase in net income might be partly due to LIFO liquidation—selling older inventory layers at newer, often higher, costs—resulting in artificially inflated profits. While this can reflect genuine operational results, it raises ethical questions about the integrity of financial reporting. Managers may be tempted to induce or accelerate LIFO liquidation to meet earnings targets, which can mislead investors.

Ethically, such practices undermine transparency and violate the principle of faithful representation. Although LIFO liquidation is permissible under GAAP, companies must disclose it transparently, and auditors have a responsibility to assess whether such transactions distort financial health intentionally. Therefore, ethical issues arise when LIFO liquidation profits are used strategically to portray healthier financial performance than reality, potentially misleading stakeholders.

Conclusion

Current GAAP standards for pension accounting, inventory valuation, and revenue recognition are designed to promote transparency and comparability. Nonetheless, continuous improvements—such as adopting more conservative assumptions, enhancing disclosures, and fostering ethical practices—are essential. As regulatory standards evolve and new challenges emerge, companies and auditors must balance the technical requirements with ethical considerations to ensure that financial reporting accurately reflects economic reality and maintains stakeholders’ trust.

References

• Financial Accounting Standards Board (FASB). (2020). ASC Topics 715 and 606: Pension and Revenue Recognition. FASB.
• Harvard Business School. (2018). Ethical issues in financial reporting. Harvard Business Review.
• Kieso, D., Weygandt, J., & Warfield, T. (2020). Intermediate Accounting (16th ed.). Wiley.
• Pfister, B. (2019). The role of internal controls in preventing fraud. Journal of Accountancy, 227(4), 78-83.
• Revsine, L., Collins, D., Johnson, W., & Mittelstaedt, F. (2019). Financial Reporting & Analysis (8th ed.). Pearson.
• Schroeder, R. G., Clark, M. W., & Cathey, J. M. (2019). Financial Accounting Theory and Analysis. Wiley.
• Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC). (2021). Disclosure of LIFO liquidation. SEC Regulations.
• Stubbs, L. (2020). Ethical considerations in inventory accounting. Journal of Business Ethics, 162(2), 323-334.
• Williamson, O. E. (2017). The economics of corporate governance: Firms, markets, and the public sector. Routledge.
• Zeff, S. A. (2019). The evolution of accounting reports and standards. The Accounting Review, 94(5), 165–192.