According To John Locke, In Your Own Words, What Is Freedom

1 According To John Locke In Your Own Words What Is Freedom

According to John Locke, freedom fundamentally refers to the individual's right to govern oneself without undue interference from external authorities. Locke viewed liberty as a natural right inherent to all individuals, enabling them to pursue their own interests and live according to their own will, so long as they do not infringe upon the rights of others. Freedom and liberty are closely related concepts; both emphasize the absence of tyranny and the capacity for self-determination. However, freedom can be considered a broader concept involving absence of coercion, while liberty often refers specifically to legal and political rights that protect individual autonomy. Locke believed that genuine freedom is protected in a social contract where government exists to preserve these rights, and any infringement upon them by rulers constitutes a loss of liberty.

Paper For Above instruction

John Locke's conception of freedom is rooted in the idea of natural rights and individual sovereignty. Locke argued that in the state of nature, humans are free and equal, possessing rights that include life, liberty, and property. These rights form the basis of individual freedom, which Locke believed should be protected by government. Freedom, in Locke's sense, is not merely freedom from restraint but also freedom to pursue one's own interests within the bounds of natural law. Locke's distinction between liberty and freedom has implications for understanding political rights; liberty refers specifically to rights granted and protected by the political system, such as religious tolerance and fair trial rights. Both concepts relate to restraint from arbitrary authority; however, freedom emphasizes the inherent rights of individuals, while liberty signifies the legal protections in a civil society.

The relationship between liberty and freedom can be observed in Locke's emphasis on the social contract. Individuals agree to form governments that secure their natural rights, thus transforming natural freedom into civil liberty. Under this framework, genuine freedom involves adherence to laws that are enacted with the consent of the governed, ensuring that liberty does not lead to chaos but is balanced with social order. Limitations on freedom, such as laws penalizing theft or violence, are justified because they protect the individual rights of others. Locke believed that the primary purpose of government is to safeguard these rights, thus maintaining the individual's freedom to live without fear of others infringing on their property or safety.

Checks and Balances in the U.S. Constitution

Within the U.S. Constitution, the system of checks and balances ensures that no branch of government becomes too powerful. The executive branch, headed by the President, can veto legislation passed by Congress, which is a check on the legislative branch. Conversely, Congress can override a presidential veto with a two-thirds majority, checking the executive's power. The judicial branch, led by the Supreme Court, has the authority to review laws passed by Congress and declared executive actions unconstitutional, thus checking both legislative and executive powers. The President's appointment of Supreme Court justices subject to Senate approval provides a check and balance on the judicial branch, influencing the judiciary's composition and decisions. The judiciary's power of judicial review, established in Marbury v. Madison, ensures that legislative and executive actions adhere to the Constitution, maintaining the balance among all branches.

Failures of the Articles of Confederation

The Articles of Confederation, ratified in 1781, established the first government of the United States but proved inadequate due to several critical failures. Firstly, it created a weak central government that lacked the power to tax, regulate commerce, or enforce laws, leaving it dependent on states for revenue and authority. This decentralization led to economic disarray, as states imposed tariffs on each other and faced no unified economic policy. Furthermore, the Articles required unanimous consent for amendments, making reform impossible when issues arose. The government also lacked an executive branch or a federal judiciary, impairing its ability to enforce laws or resolve disputes effectively. These weaknesses became especially evident during Shays' Rebellion, which exposed the inability of the government to maintain order and protect property rights. The recognition of these failures catalyzed the drafting of the U.S. Constitution to create a stronger federal structure capable of managing national interests.

Federalism and the Balance of Power

Federalism is a political system where power is divided between a central (federal) government and smaller political units, such as states. This division aims to balance sovereignty, preventing any one entity from becoming too powerful. In the U.S., the Constitution delineates this balance through various provisions. The Supremacy Clause (Article VI) stipulates that federal laws take precedence over state laws when conflicts arise, establishing the dominance of national legislation. The 10th Amendment reinforces federalism by reserving powers not delegated to the federal government to the states or the people. The 9th and 14th Amendments extend individual rights and equal protection, influencing the scope of federal and state powers. Supreme Court decisions, such as McCulloch v. Maryland (1819) and Gibbons v. Ogden (1824), reinforced federal authority, while cases like New York Times Co. v. Sullivan (1964) underscored protections for civil liberties. This balance aims to maintain a union where both levels of government function effectively within their constitutional boundaries.

The Three Branches of Government

The United States government consists of three branches: the legislative, executive, and judicial branches. The legislative branch, composed of Congress (the House of Representatives and the Senate), is responsible for making laws. It drafts, debates, and passes legislation, representing the interests of the people and the states. The executive branch, led by the President, enforces and administers laws. The President, as head of state and government, also manages foreign policy and commands the armed forces. The judicial branch, headed by the Supreme Court, interprets the laws and ensures they comply with the Constitution. It resolves conflicts over laws and protects individual rights. Each branch operates independently but is interconnected through a system of checks and balances, preventing any one branch from dominating the government and ensuring accountability.

References

• Cotton, A. (2020). Understanding the U.S. Constitution. Oxford University Press.
• Madison, J. (1787). Federalist No. 51. The Independent Journal.
• Locke, J. (1689). Two Treatises of Government. Awnsham Churchill.
• Epstein, R. A. (2014). The Political Theory of the Constitution. Harvard University Press.
• Kagan, R. (2001). Adversarial Legalism: The American Way of Law. Harvard University Press.
• Burgess, M. (2018). The Framers' Intentions and the Role of Checks and Balances. Yale Law Journal.
• Elazar, D. J. (1987). Exploring Federalism. University of Alabama Press.
• Marbury v. Madison, 5 U.S. (1 Cranch) 137 (1803).
• McCulloch v. Maryland, 17 U.S. (4 Wheat.) 316 (1819).
• Gibbons v. Ogden, 22 U.S. (9 Wheat.) 1 (1824).