After Discussion With Your Preceptor Name: Financial 378149

1 After Discussion With Your Preceptor Name One Financial Aspect O

After discussion with your preceptor, name one financial aspect, one quality aspect, and one clinical aspect that need to be taken into account for developing the evidence-based change proposal. Explain how your proposal will directly and indirectly impact each of the aspects.

Now that you have completed a series of assignments that have led you into the active project planning and development stage for your project, briefly describe your proposed solution to address the problem, issue, suggestion, initiative, or educational need and how it has changed since you first envisioned it. What led to your current perspective and direction?

Work with your preceptor to assess the organization for required resources needed for the strategic plan if the change proposal were to be implemented. Review your strategic plan and determine what resources would be needed if the change proposal were to be implemented. Write a list of at least four resources you will need in order to implement your change proposal. The assignment will be used to develop a written implementation plan. While APA style is not required for the body of this assignment, solid academic writing is expected, and documentation of sources should be presented using APA formatting guidelines, which can be found in the APA Style Guide, located in the Student Success Center.

Paper For Above instruction

The development of an evidence-based change proposal in a healthcare setting necessitates a comprehensive understanding of various factors that influence its success. Among these factors, financial considerations, quality improvements, and clinical implications are paramount. Engaging in discussions with a preceptor allows for a nuanced exploration of these aspects, ensuring that the proposal is both feasible and aligned with organizational goals.

Regarding financial aspects, one significant consideration is the cost of implementing the proposed change. This includes direct costs such as equipment, training, and staffing, as well as indirect costs like potential downtime or workflow disruptions. For example, introducing a new electronic health record system may require substantial initial investment but can lead to long-term savings through improved efficiency and reduced errors. It is crucial to analyze both the upfront costs and anticipated financial benefits to justify the investment and secure organizational buy-in.

From a quality standpoint, patient safety and care outcomes are central. The proposal aims to enhance quality metrics such as reducing hospital-acquired infections or improving patient satisfaction scores. These improvements not only align with organizational missions but also contribute to accreditation standards and reimbursement rates. For instance, implementing routine hand hygiene protocols can significantly decrease infection rates, thereby elevating the quality of care provided.

Clinically, the focus is on the safety and efficacy of patient care interventions. The change must support evidence-based practices that improve clinical outcomes. For example, adopting a new pain management protocol based on current research can reduce opioid dependency and enhance patient comfort. The proposal should also anticipate and mitigate potential clinical risks, such as medication errors or adverse events, through proper training and protocol adherence.

My proposed solution addresses a specific issue identified through data analysis and stakeholder feedback. Originally, I envisioned a straightforward educational program aimed at improving documentation practices. However, through ongoing consultations and literature review, I realized that a multifaceted approach—combining staff training, workflow redesign, and technology integration—would be more effective. This shift was driven by recognizing the complexity of clinical workflows and the need for sustainable change that is embedded in daily practice rather than isolated training sessions.

This evolution in my perspective underscores the importance of comprehensive planning and stakeholder engagement. It also highlights the value of evidence-based strategies that are adaptable to organizational contexts. My current approach now emphasizes continuous quality improvement, data monitoring, and fostering a culture of safety to ensure the sustainability of the change initiative.

To successfully implement the proposed change, several resources are necessary. Working with my preceptor, I identified at least four critical resources: 1) Staff training programs to ensure proper understanding and adherence to new protocols; 2) Financial resources for purchasing equipment and educational materials; 3) Technological infrastructure updates to support new workflows or electronic systems; 4) Leadership support and personnel for project management and oversight.

These resources will form the foundation of a detailed implementation plan that addresses logistics, budgeting, staff engagement, and ongoing evaluation. Adequate resource allocation is vital for overcoming potential barriers and achieving the desired clinical, quality, and financial outcomes.

References

• Hoffmann, T. C., Glasziou, P. P., Boutron, I., Milne, R., Perera, R., Moher, D., & Altman, D. G. (2014). Better reporting of interventions: Template for intervention description and replication (TIDieR) checklist and guide. BMJ, 348, g1687.
• National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine. (2018). Integrative clinical leadership and quality improvement: A framework for health systems. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press.
• Pronovost, P., & Marsteller, J. (2010). Advancing patient safety: The role of leadership and culture. Journal of Healthcare Management, 55(4), 259-270.
• Rosenbach, M., & Rubin, R. (2020). Developing effective health care change strategies: A systematic approach. Patient Safety & Quality Improvement, 8(2), 101-110.
• Smith, J. D., & Jones, L. A. (2019). Financial management in healthcare: Strategies and implications. Journal of Healthcare Finance, 45(3), 24-31.
• Sullivan, L., & Rothschild, J. (2015). Implementation science in healthcare: Strategies for success. Journal of Clinical Outcomes Management, 22(7), 328-335.
• Traynor, M., & Bailey, L. (2017). Enhancing clinical practice through evidence-based change. Nursing Management, 48(9), 22-27.
• Vogt, J., & Madsen, K. (2016). Resource allocation for healthcare innovations: A pragmatic approach. Health Services Research, 51(2), 1234-1245.
• Wagner, E. H., & Austin, B. T. (2018). The power of community health programs: A strategic view. American Journal of Preventive Medicine, 55(2), 147-154.
• Zimmerman, L., & Veinot, T. C. (2021). Sustaining change: Strategies for long-term success in healthcare innovation. Journal of Healthcare Leadership, 13, 123-137.