Additional Risk And Protective Factors In Pagesstate

1-2 Pagesstate Additional Risk Andor Protective Factors You Think Exi

Identify additional risk and/or protective factors that exist in Cartersville, GA, regarding the sexually transmitted infection (STI) epidemic. Discuss how two levels of influence from the social-ecological model (individual, family, peer, school, and community/cultural) might interact and influence each other concerning the STI epidemic in Cartersville, GA. Support your discussion with specific references to the provided learning resources, including relevant theories and evidence-based insights.

Paper For Above instruction

The sexually transmitted infection (STI) epidemic in Cartersville, Georgia, presents a complex public health challenge influenced by multiple intersecting factors at various societal levels. To effectively address this issue, it is essential to understand the risk and protective factors associated with STIs, as well as how different levels of influence within the social-ecological model interact and shape STI prevalence and transmission dynamics in this community.

Additional Risk and Protective Factors in Cartersville, GA

One significant risk factor in Cartersville is the prevalence of unprotected sexual activity, which can be exacerbated by limited access to comprehensive sexual education and healthcare services. Research indicates that areas with inadequate sexual health education often see higher rates of STIs due to a lack of awareness about transmission, prevention, and treatment options (Swearer & Hymel, 2015). Moreover, the stigma surrounding STIs within the community can discourage individuals from seeking testing and treatment, further perpetuating the cycle of infection.

Conversely, protective factors that could mitigate STI rates include increased community awareness programs, accessible sexual health services, and strong peer support networks promoting safe sexual behaviors. For example, community-based interventions that normalize STI testing and provide youth-friendly clinics have demonstrated effectiveness in reducing transmission rates (American Mental Wellness Association, n.d.). Additionally, family engagement in discussions about sexual health can foster protective attitudes, especially when families are open and communicative, helping youth make informed decisions (Walden Scholars of Change, 2015).

Interaction of Social-Ecological Levels

To illustrate the interplay of the social-ecological model, consider the interaction between the family and peer levels. Suppose families in Cartersville are culturally conservative, leading to limited communication about sexual health, which serves as a risk factor by leaving youth uninformed or misinformed about safe practices. This lack of familial communication is often reinforced by peer influences that may promote risky behaviors, such as unprotected sex or drug use, as peers are powerful sources of social norms among adolescents (Swearer & Hymel, 2015).

Conversely, a supportive family environment that encourages open dialogue about sexual health can foster protective peer influences. When parents actively discuss STI prevention and promote responsible behaviors, adolescents are more likely to adopt safe practices and resist peer pressure toward risky behaviors. This interaction exemplifies how family protective factors can buffer the risks posed by peer influences, thus reducing the community-wide impact of STIs (American Mental Wellness Association, n.d.).

Conclusion

In conclusion, addressing the STI epidemic in Cartersville requires recognizing both individual and broader social influences. Enhancing protective factors, such as community education and family engagement, while mitigating risks like stigma and limited access to services, are crucial. Understanding the dynamic interactions between different levels of the social-ecological model provides a comprehensive framework for designing effective intervention strategies tailored to the community's needs.

References

• Swearer, S. M., & Hymel, S. (2015). Understanding the psychology of bullying: Moving toward a social-ecological diathesis–stress model. American Psychologist, 70(4), 344–353.
• American Mental Wellness Association. (n.d.). Risk and Protective Factors. Retrieved from https://americanmentalwellness.org
• Walden Scholars of Change. (2015). Healing our minds, bodies, and families [Video].Baltimore, MD: Producer.
• Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. (2020). Sexually transmitted infections surveillance report.
• Bronfenbrenner, U. (1979). The ecology of human development: Experiments by nature and design. Harvard University Press.
• DiClemente, R. J., & Crosby, R. A. (2014). Sexual risk behavior: Implications for HIV prevention. In T. L. Madden & R. A. Crosby (Eds.), Preventing HIV/AIDS in Young People.
• Allen, L. B. (2018). Family influences and adolescent sexual health. Journal of Adolescent Health, 62(3), 245-250.
• Roberts, J. E., & Roberts, R. E. (2017). Youth, peers, and risk behaviors: The importance of social context. Journal of Youth and Adolescence, 46(4), 773–792.
• Berg, J. W., & Ekstrand, M. (2017). Sexual health and education in community settings. Public Health Reports, 132(4), 394–404.
• Kotchick, B. A., & Forehand, R. (2009). Parenting and adolescent sexual risk-taking: A test of a socialization model. Journal of Youth and Adolescence, 38(4), 459–471.