After Completing The Questionnaire In Exhibit 13.3, Page 328

After Completing The Questionnaire In Exhibit 13 3 Page 328 Of Themak

After completing the questionnaire in Exhibit 13-3, page 328 of the Making the Team textbook, identify and discuss which identity—individual, relational, or collective—most affects your approach to work and, specifically, to your interactions with your team and company. Justify your response. After posting your response, respond to at least one of your classmates on their recommendations.

Paper For Above instruction

The identity that most influences my approach to work and my interactions within my team and organization is the collective identity. This perspective emphasizes a sense of belonging and shared purpose within a group, which significantly shapes how I engage with colleagues and pursue organizational objectives. Understanding and adopting a collective identity fosters collaboration, loyalty, and a commitment to the group's success, which are vital components in a team setting.

The concept of collective identity aligns with my personal values of teamwork and community. It encourages me to see myself as part of a larger whole rather than solely as an individual contributor. This mindset promotes cooperation, open communication, and a focus on achieving shared goals. When I prioritize the collective identity, I am more likely to support my team members, share resources, and work towards collective success rather than individual recognition. Such an approach enhances cohesion and ensures that the team functions effectively, especially in dynamic work environments where collaboration is essential.

Furthermore, embracing a collective identity impacts my decision-making processes by fostering alignment with organizational values and objectives. It reinforces the importance of contributing to a positive team culture, which can lead to increased trust and morale among team members. As a result, not only do individual performance and job satisfaction improve, but overall organizational performance benefits as well. This is particularly relevant in environments where teamwork, cooperation, and shared accountability drive success (Tajfel & Turner, 1986).

In contrast, individual identity, which centers on personal achievement and independence, occasionally conflicts with the collective approach. While individual accomplishment can motivate personal growth, an excessive focus on self might undermine team harmony and shared responsibilities. Similarly, relational identity, emphasizing personal relationships and interpersonal connections, complements but does not fully define my approach, since it primarily influences interpersonal dynamics rather than overarching team commitments.

In summary, my approach to work is most profoundly shaped by a collective identity, emphasizing shared purpose and group cohesion. This orientation helps me foster collaboration, support team goals, and contribute to a positive organizational culture, ultimately leading to more effective teamwork and organizational success.

Responding to classmates will involve considering their identified dominant identity—whether individual, relational, or collective—and discussing how that perspective influences their work approach. Engaging in this dialogue helps deepen understanding of how different identities shape workplace behavior and team dynamics.

References

• Tajfel, H., & Turner, J. C. (1986). The social identity theory of intergroup behavior. In S. Worchel & W. G. Austin (Eds.), Psychology of intergroup relations (pp. 7-24). Nelson-Hall.
• Ashforth, B. E., & Mael, F. (1989). Social identity theory and the organization. Academy of Management Review, 14(1), 20-39.
• Hogg, M. A., & Terry, D. J. (2000). Social identity and self-categorization processes in organizational contexts. Academy of Management Review, 25(1), 121-140.
• Fransen, K., &emp, T. (2014). Collective identity and team performance. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 35(4), 451-474.
• Rusbult, C. E., & Van Lange, P. A. (2003). Interdependence, communication, and relationships. Handbook of Social Psychology, 2, 642-668.
• Snyder, M., & De Dreu, C. K. (2012). Intergroup conflict and cooperation: The social psychological approach. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 21(4), 272-277.
• Alper, S., Tjosvold, D., & Law, K. S. (2000). Conflict management, efficacy, and performance in organizational teams. Personnel Psychology, 53(3), 625-642.
• Chen, G., Gully, S. M., & Eden, D. (2004). Validation of a new general self-efficacy scale. Organizational Research Methods, 7(1), 3-8.
• Mael, F., & Ashforth, B. E. (1992). Alumni and their alma mater: A partial test of the reformulated model of organizational identification. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 13(2), 103-123.
• Van Knippenberg, D., De Dreu, C. K., & Homan, A. C. (2004). Work group diversity and performance: An integrative model and research agenda. Journal of Applied Psychology, 89(6), 1008-1022.