Agenda Comparison Grid Template Title First Name Last Name ✓ Solved

Agenda Comparison Grid Template Title First Name Last Name Wal

Part 1: Agenda Comparison Grid

Use this Agenda Comparison Grid to document information about the population health/healthcare issue you selected and the presidential agendas. By completing this grid, you will develop a more in-depth understanding of your selected issue and how you might position it politically based on the presidential agendas.

Identify the Population Health concern you selected: Global health security agenda.

Describe the Population Health concern you selected and the factors that contribute to it: The agenda focuses on the impacts on the policies and investments made by the USA in protecting people against threats caused by infectious disease and the associated effects on global health and security. The agenda focuses on accelerating progress towards health safety and facilitating regional and global collaboration towards achieving specific health goals (Farrer et al., 2015).

Administration: President Trump, President Obama, President Bush.

Describe the administrative agenda focus related to this issue for the current and two previous presidents: Since 2016, the administration of President Trump has rendered continuous support to partner countries in improving the action plan concerning health security. President Trump elevated the agenda as a national priority by including efforts in detecting, preventing, and responding to infectious diseases. The administration supported the goals of the agenda through bilateral partnerships that focus on investments and efforts to unify the nation’s approach by evaluating health security capacity and mobilizing resources. President Obama focused on bridging the disease-focused assistance developments of emerging diseases in a practical perspective. President Bush enacted the emergency plan for infectious diseases and the malaria initiative to accelerate progress towards global health and safety.

Identify the allocations of financial and other resources that the current and two previous presidents dedicated to this issue: Trump allocated $48.7 billion to support global health security programs in four years. The administration implemented technological advancements to improve efficiency in dealing with health threats and expanded healthcare centers in Africa, Asia, and the Middle East (Magnan, 2017). Obama allocated $63 billion to the global health security strategy and built more infrastructures for the treatment of infectious diseases. Investments were made in scientific and technological developments in prevention and control of diseases. His administration allocated $154 billion for a 10-year plan on improving global healthcare and making the coverage more affordable.

Explain how each of the presidential administrations approached the issue: The administration took concrete steps to improve the capacity to respond to health emergencies. The state recognized a whole-of-society approach to achieving global health security. Trump strengthened international institutions to enhance the implementation of the health security agenda. President Obama approached this by developing a strategy that cohesively strengthens global public surveillance that aligns with the needs of the global population. George Bush outlined health care initiatives that are key to implementing this agenda and proposed solutions to various problems in the world healthcare system.

Part 2: Agenda Comparison Grid Analysis

Using the information from Part 1, document information about the population health/healthcare issue you selected.

Administrative Agency: Most likely Coordinating Center for Infectious Diseases, Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention Agency (CDC).

How might your selected healthcare issue get on the agenda for the current and two previous presidents? The healthcare security issue is vital in protecting domestic and international populations and can be enhanced through leadership, partnerships, and epidemiological strategies.

Who would you choose as the entrepreneur/champion/sponsor for the healthcare issue you selected for the current and two previous presidents? I would choose President Trump as an entrepreneur, President Obama as a champion due to his strategies to detect and respond to health threats, and President Bush as a sponsor focusing on healthcare services for the poor and elderly.

Narrative with the Facts: It is time for the legislatures to pay attention to the decreasing commitment of the USA towards global health security. Improving global healthcare and ensuring it is affordable, transparent, and efficient is essential. There is a need for strong connections between policy and budget priorities to ensure adequate financing for health security operations and preparedness.

Conclusion: Developments on health security policies are crucial to improving preparedness for future outbreaks. The USA should collaborate with other nations to establish a health security research agenda. Nursing organizations should also participate in implementing this agenda.

Paper For Above Instructions

The chosen population health concern is the global health security agenda, which emphasizes the influence of US policies and investments in safeguarding against infectious disease threats and its implications for global health. This agenda has transitioned into a critical domain for national and international stakeholders, particularly evidenced during global health crises such as the COVID-19 pandemic. Effective political advocacy is essential to position health security as a prominent agenda item across all presidential administrations, facilitating concerted efforts for sustainable investments in health infrastructure.

In analyzing the administrative priorities of the Trump, Obama, and Bush administrations, we observe varying approaches towards the global health security agenda. Trump's administration prioritized health security and response to infectious diseases, advancing a national action plan that highlighted the urgency of improving both domestic and overseas health threats. This included allocating substantial resources towards strengthening health security frameworks globally, indicating the administration's recognition of interconnectivity in public health threats (Magnan, 2017).

Conversely, the Obama administration demonstrated a proactive stance in global health security through the implementation of multi-faceted strategies aimed at elevating responses to emerging infectious diseases. Policies during his tenure were characterized by investments in global health partnerships and frameworks that supported a comprehensive response to infectious diseases, aligning with the priorities of health organizations worldwide (Carey & Crammond, 2015). Similarly, the Bush administration laid foundational policies that formally recognized the importance of infectious disease response, notably enacting significant health initiatives aimed at enhancing global health systems and infrastructure (Farrer et al., 2015).

The resources allocated to global health initiatives under these administrations underscore the fiscal commitment to addressing health security concerns. Trump’s administration dedicated $48.7 billion towards global health programs, facilitating advancements in surveillance and technology to enhance response mechanisms. The support of the CDC and other agencies played a crucial role in achieving these objectives, emphasizing the need for a coordinated approach in addressing public health (Magnan, 2017).

Obama’s substantial investment of $63 billion reflects a strong commitment to bolster the global health framework, both in terms of clinical infrastructure and research capabilities, while Bush’s focus on funding health initiatives laid a significant groundwork for future administrations to build upon. The allocations between these presidencies illustrate a continuing evolution of health priorities within the political landscape, influenced by ongoing global challenges and domestic health needs.

Addressing how health security issues gain prominence in presidential agendas reveals an intricate leverage of epidemiological data, leadership, and enhanced coordination across various health sectors. Modern presidents have employed various strategies to maintain focus on healthcare security, driven by the necessity to ensure public health safety amid rising global health threats. Maintaining a strong presence in health security discussions is pivotal in safeguarding both American citizens and the global population from future pandemics.

Nurses and healthcare professionals serve as crucial advocates for health security, aiming to mitigate disparities and promote equitable access to healthcare services. Their roles extend beyond clinical settings, encompassing advocacy for policies that protect vulnerable populations and ensuring communal involvement in health security initiatives (Carey & Crammond, 2015). By leveraging insights gained from health security advancements, healthcare professionals can engage in meaningful discourse around policy, awareness, and funding needed to enhance local and global health systems.

In conclusion, advancing health security policy is essential for fortifying national and global response capabilities to infectious disease outbreaks. The collaborative efforts of public health practitioners, policymakers, and the broader community are vital in constructing effective health security frameworks. The necessity for robust, evidence-based policy creation, alongside sustained funding, is imperative for improving global health outcomes and fostering resilience against potential health threats.

References

• Carey, G., & Crammond, B. (2015). Action on the social determinants of health: Views from inside the policy process. Social Science & Medicine, 128.
• Farrer, L., Marinetti, C., Cavaco, Y.L., & Costongs, C. (2015). Advocacy for health equity: A synthesis review. The Millbank Quarterly, 93(2).
• Magnan, S. (2017). Global health policy 101 for health care. Discussion paper, Washington, DC: National Academy of Medicine.
• World Health Organization. (2020). Global Health Security: Health Security and COVID-19.
• Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. (2020). Pandemic Preparedness and Health Security.
• KFF. (2020). The U.S. Global Health Response to COVID-19.
• Institute of Medicine (US). (2011). Global Health Security: A Critical Review.
• Naylor, C. D. (2017). Integrating Health Security into Health Policy. The New England Journal of Medicine.
• United Nations. (2021). Global Health Security Agenda: A Path Forward.
• WHO. (2018). World Health Assembly Resolution on Health Security.