Alaska Launch: A Private Sector Aerospace Company Provided

B 1901alaska Launch A Private Sector Aerospace Company Provided The

Analyze the financial data provided for B-1901alaska Launch, a private-sector aerospace company, including costs for satellite construction. Calculate the cost of goods manufactured (COGM) and explain whether it is necessarily the same as the cost of goods sold (COGS). Discuss how costs such as direct materials, direct labor, and overhead are tracked to individual satellite jobs within the company's job costing system. Evaluate the significance of job costing in determining fair selling prices for each satellite.

Sample Paper For Above instruction

In today’s competitive aerospace industry, accurate cost accounting is essential for ensuring profitability and competitive pricing. The provided data for B-1901alaska Launch offers a comprehensive snapshot of the costs incurred during satellite construction, including direct materials, direct labor, and factory overhead. This analysis aims to calculate the Cost of Goods Manufactured (COGM), differentiate it from the Cost of Goods Sold (COGS), discuss the tracking of costs within a job costing system, and evaluate the importance of such systems in establishing fair pricing strategies.

Calculation of Cost of Goods Manufactured (COGM)

The Cost of Goods Manufactured represents the total production costs for goods completed during a specific period. It encompasses direct materials used, direct labor, and manufacturing overhead applied. The calculation begins with the direct costs incurred and adjusts for beginning and ending work in process (WIP) inventory:

  • Beginning Work in Process Inventory: $14,550,098
  • Direct Materials Used: $13,442,769
  • Direct Labor: $21,889,554
  • Applied Factory Overhead: $8,223,454
  • Ending Work in Process Inventory: $17,559,000

Using the formula:

COGM = Beginning WIP + Total Manufacturing Costs – Ending WIP

Where Total Manufacturing Costs = Direct Materials + Direct Labor + Factory Overhead

Thus:

Total Manufacturing Costs = $13,442,769 + $21,889,554 + $8,223,454 = $43,555,777

Calculating COGM:

COGM = $14,550,098 + $43,555,777 – $17,559,000 = $40,546,875

Is COGM necessarily the same as COGS? Why or why not?

The Cost of Goods Manufactured (COGM) reflects the total cost of goods completed during the period, but it is not necessarily identical to the Cost of Goods Sold (COGS). COGS includes the costs of goods sold within a specific period and is adjusted for the inventory levels at the beginning and end of the period. Essentially, COGS = COGM + Beginning Finished Goods Inventory – Ending Finished Goods Inventory. Therefore, while COGM provides the cost to produce goods, COGS indicates the costs associated with the goods actually sold during that period. Variations in beginning and ending inventories of finished goods can cause COGS to differ from COGM.

Tracking costs to specific satellites in job costing

Given the nature of satellite construction, where each satellite is built to unique specifications, it is crucial to accurately assign costs to individual jobs. The company would employ a job order costing system, wherein direct costs such as direct materials and direct labor are directly traced to each satellite job through specific job cost sheets. Overhead application is accomplished via predetermined overhead rates based on direct labor hours or material costs. Using job cost sheets, the company can accumulate costs specific to each satellite, reflecting the actual resources consumed.

For example, direct materials assigned to a particular satellite are recorded as they are requisitioned from inventory, and direct labor hours are tracked via employee time cards linked to each job. Factory overhead is allocated based on an activity measure such as labor hours or machine hours, ensuring that each satellite's total costs are accurately captured. This detailed tracking ensures precise cost calculation for pricing and profitability analysis.

The importance of job costing in establishing fair selling prices

Job costing plays a pivotal role in establishing a fair and competitive selling price for each satellite. Since satellite projects vary significantly in complexity and resource requirements, a uniform markup based solely on average costs could lead to pricing that is either too low—risking losses—or too high—deterring customers. Accurate job costing provides a detailed understanding of the actual costs incurred for each satellite, enabling the company to set prices that cover costs and deliver desired profit margins. Furthermore, detailed cost data supports negotiations with clients, helping justify prices based on specific resource consumption.

Moreover, a reliable job costing system aids in identifying cost overruns and process inefficiencies. It allows management to evaluate profitability on a project-by-project basis and adjust pricing strategies accordingly. Consequently, implementing a robust job costing system is vital for financial health, competitive positioning, and customer satisfaction in the aerospace manufacturing industry.

Conclusion

In summary, the calculation of COGM for B-1901alaska Launch demonstrates the total production costs for satellite manufacturing, which are integral to pricing and profitability analysis. Although COGM differs from COGS due to inventory considerations, both are essential in financial reporting. Appropriately tracking costs on a job basis ensures accurate pricing, improves cost control, and enhances decision-making. In an industry where project specifications vary widely, robust job costing is indispensable for establishing fair prices that reflect actual resource usage, thereby supporting sustainable growth and competitive advantage.

References

  • Drury, C. (2013). Cost and Management Accounting. Cengage Learning.
  • Horngren, C. T., Datar, S. M., & Rajan, M. (2015). Cost Accounting: A managerial emphasis. Pearson.
  • Kaplan, R. S., & Cooper, R. (1998). Cost & Effect: Using Integrated Cost Systems to Drive Profitability and Performance. Harvard Business School Press.
  • Anthony, R. N., & Govindarajan, V. (2007). Management Control Systems. McGraw-Hill Education.
  • Hilton, R. W., & Platt, D. E. (2010). Managerial Accounting: Creating Value in a Dynamic Business Environment. McGraw-Hill.
  • Garrison, R. H., Noreen, E. W., & Brewer, P. C. (2018). Managerial Accounting. McGraw-Hill Education.
  • Tan, C. (2014). Principles of Cost Accounting. Wiley.
  • Weygandt, J. J., Kimmel, P. D., & Kieso, D. E. (2015). Financial & Managerial Accounting. Wiley.
  • Simons, R. (2000). Performance Measurement & Control Systems for Implementing Strategy. Pearson.
  • Cooper, R., & Kaplan, R. S. (1988). Measure Costs Right: Make the Right Decisions. Harvard Business Review, 66(5), 96-103.

Related Assignments