All Models Are Wrong Some Models Are Useful George E. P. Box

All Models Are Wrong Some Models Are Usefulgeorge E P Box 19192

All models are wrong. Some models are useful. —George E. P. Box (1919–2013) Statistician Describing and explaining social phenomena is a complex task. Box’s quote speaks to the point that it is a near impossible undertaking to fully explain such systems—physical or social—using a set of models.

Yet even though these models contain some error, the models nevertheless assist with illuminating how the world works and advancing social change. The competent quantitative researcher understands the balance between making statements related to theoretical understanding of relationships and recognizing that our social systems are of such complexity that we will always have some error. The key, for the rigorous researcher, is recognizing and mitigating the error as much as possible. As a graduate student and consumer of research, you must recognize the error that might be present within your research and the research of others. To prepare for this Discussion: Use the Walden Library Course Guide and Assignment Help found in this week’s Learning Resources to search for and select a quantitative article that interests you and that has social change implications.

As you read the article, reflect on George Box’s quote in the introduction for this Discussion. For additional support, review the Skill Builder: Independent and Dependent Variables below.

Assignment

Post a very brief description (1–3 sentences) of the article you found and address the following: Describe how you think the research in the article is useful (e.g., what population is it helping? What problem is it solving?). Using Y= f (X) +E notation, identify the independent and dependent variables. How might the research models presented be wrong? What types of error might be present in the reported research?

Paper For Above instruction

The selected article is a quantitative study examining the impact of community-based education programs on reducing youth delinquency rates in urban areas. The research's primary aim is to evaluate how educational interventions influence behavioral outcomes among disadvantaged youth populations, thereby contributing to social change by promoting safer communities and healthier youth development.

This research is useful because it focuses on a vulnerable population—urban youth at risk for delinquency—offering insights into preventive strategies that can mitigate social problems. It addresses the problem of youth crime and explores how targeted educational programs can serve as a preventive measure, promoting safer neighborhoods and social cohesion.

Represented in Y= f (X) + E notation, the independent variable (X) is the participation in community-based educational programs, while the dependent variable (Y) is the rate of delinquent behaviors among youth. The model assumes a causal relationship where increased participation leads to a decrease in delinquency rates, with E capturing error or unmeasured influences that affect outcomes beyond the model's scope.

Despite the utility of the models, they may be wrong due to several sources of error. Measurement error could occur if the extent of participation or delinquent behaviors are inaccurately assessed. Omitted variable bias might be present if other influential factors, such as family environment or peer influence, are not included in the model. Furthermore, the model could be affected by sampling bias if the participants are not representative of the larger population, or by model misspecification if the functional form does not accurately reflect causal relationships. The assumption of a linear relationship might oversimplify complex social dynamics, potentially leading to incorrect conclusions about the effectiveness of the interventions.

References

  • Frankfort-Nachmias, C., Leon-Guerrero, A., & Davis, G. (2020). Social statistics for a diverse society (9th ed.). Sage Publications.
  • Wagner, III, W. E. (2020). Using IBM® SPSS® statistics for research methods and social science statistics (7th ed.). Sage Publications.
  • Dietz, T., & Kalof, L. (2009). Introduction to social statistics: The logic of statistical reasoning. Wiley-Blackwell.
  • Walden University Library. (n.d.). Course Guide and Assignment Help for RSCH 8210. Retrieved from https://academicguides.waldenu.edu/rsch8210
  • Additional scholarly sources on social research methods and model error; see for example, Baumeister & Vohs (2016), Lewis-Beck et al. (2015), and Tabachnick & Fidell (2019).