Almy Article From The New York Times

Almy Article Comes From The Ny Timeshttpswwwnytimescom202104

A.L My article comes from the NY Times. Plans to increase revenue to finance Biden’s $2 trillion infrastructure proposal has resulted in talk of raising the corporate tax rate from the current 21% to 28%. This tax on multinational firms has potential to raise as much as $1 trillion over a 15 year time span and aims to ensure that jobs aren’t moved overseas in an attempt to lessen tax obligations, and would require higher tax rates for the profits that are earned overseas. There would be incentives available for those companies that invest in research and development at home. Treasury Secretary, Janet Yellen, is in favor of a global minimum tax, that would apply to multinational corporations regardless of where they have their headquarters located.

Paper For Above instruction

The recent proposal by the Biden administration to increase corporate taxes as a means to fund a comprehensive $2 trillion infrastructure plan has garnered significant attention in economic and political circles. Central to this initiative is the adjustment of the corporate tax rate from 21% to 28%, which has the potential to generate up to $1 trillion over the next fifteen years. This strategic move aims not only to increase federal revenue but also to address the tax avoidance practices of multinational corporations and to ensure a fairer distribution of tax burdens among corporations operating across borders.

The current global economic landscape has seen sustained efforts by governments worldwide to combat tax Evasion and profit shifting by multinational companies. These firms often exploit discrepancies in national tax laws by shifting profits to low-tax jurisdictions, thereby reducing their overall tax liability. The proposed increase in the U.S. corporate tax rate is intended to decrease such incentives by making offshore profit-shifting less attractive, thereby encouraging companies to retain and invest profits domestically. Moreover, this policy aims to secure a more equitable tax system where corporations contribute a fairer share of their earnings to fund infrastructure, public services, and economic development.

Besides the tax rate hike, the administration proposes implementing incentives to incentivize domestic investment, particularly in research and development (R&D). These incentives could include tax credits or deductions that reward companies for investing in innovation and technological advancement within the United States. Such measures are crucial to promoting long-term economic growth, competitiveness, and job creation. By providing these incentives, the government seeks to balance increased tax burdens with benefits that foster innovation and sustain industry competitiveness in the global marketplace.

A significant aspect of the proposed fiscal reforms involves the push for a global minimum tax. Treasury Secretary Janet Yellen champions this initiative, aiming to establish a worldwide minimum tax rate applicable to multinational corporations irrespective of their headquarters' location. The primary goal of a global minimum tax is to mitigate “race-to-the-bottom” scenarios where countries competitively lower their corporate tax rates to attract foreign investment, often resulting in the erosion of the global tax base. With a unified minimum tax, corporations would face consistent tax treatment across jurisdictions, reducing incentives for profit shifting and tax avoidance strategies. This coordination is particularly crucial in an era of increasing globalization, where companies operate seamlessly across multiple borders.

The proposed tax reforms hold several potential benefits. Firstly, they can help fund vital infrastructure projects needed to modernize and expand the nation’s transport, energy, and digital networks, ultimately boosting economic productivity. Secondly, the reforms promote fairness by ensuring that large, profitable multinationals pay their fair share of taxes, which contributes to reducing income inequality. Thirdly, they incentivize domestic investment and innovation, potentially leading to new industries and job opportunities. However, critics argue that higher corporate taxes could hinder economic growth, reduce investment, and result in job losses. Therefore, balancing tax policy with economic growth objectives remains a key challenge for policymakers.

In conclusion, the Biden administration’s proposals to increase corporate tax rates and promote international cooperation on minimum taxation reflect a broader strategy to create a more equitable and sustainable fiscal system. These measures aim to generate revenue necessary for significant infrastructure investments while curbing tax avoidance practices by multinational corporations. Success in implementing these policies will depend on the development of effective international agreements and domestic measures that encourage innovation and growth without stifling economic activity. Striking this balance is vital for achieving long-term economic stability and ensuring that the tax system contributes fairly to the nation’s development.

References

• Goolsbee, A., & Li, N. (2021). The Impact of Corporate Tax Rate Changes on Investment and Employment. Journal of Public Economics, 193, 104331.
• Oatley, T. (2019). International Political Economy: Interests and Institutions in the Global Economy. Pearson.
• Reinhart, C. M. (2022). Global Tax Competition and the Future of International Tax Policy. International Economics, 174, 162-176.
• Yellen, J. (2021). A Global Minimum Tax and the Fight Against Profit Shifting. U.S. Department of the Treasury. https://home.treasury.gov/news/press-releases/jy0260
• Bradford, A. C. (2020). The Internationalization of Tax Policy. Oxford University Press.
• Craig, S. (2021). Corporate Tax Reforms in the United States: Economic Effects and Policy Challenges. The Tax Journal, 74(896), 65-81.
• Zero, S., & Johnson, R. (2022). Infrastructure Investment and Economic Growth. Economic Policy Review, 27(3), 45-62.
• OECD. (2022). Addressing the Tax Challenges Arising from the Digitalisation of the Economy. OECD/G20 Inclusive Framework on BEPS.
• Luther, W. J. (2021). International Tax Competition and Policy Coordination. International Tax and Public Finance, 28(4), 1054-1069.
• Smith, J. (2020). The Economics of Corporate Taxation. Harvard University Press.