Alternate Assignment 3: Accessibility Evaluation Of E 023900

Alternateassignment 3 Accessibility Evaluationthe Ed Roberts Campus

As we have discussed in class, there are many ways to make our community more inclusive and accessible. Unfortunately, accessibility is often an afterthought in the engineering, design, and building process of community environments. This results in the exclusion of people with disabilities in life activities that non-disabled people take for granted. The hope with this assignment is to open your eyes to the ways that our community can be accessible and inaccessible for people with disabilities, and the ways that we can be proactive in ensuring that accessibility features are present within our communities. (Remember: Accessibility is not only for those with visible disabilities but also for invisible disabilities such as heart conditions, anxiety disorders, etc.)

You will explore the concept of universal design and the accessibility features of The Ed Roberts Campus at UC Berkeley via two short videos: · Ed Roberts Campus: Building Community · The Ed Roberts Campus

This assignment must be completed in Microsoft Word format only, with 3-5 pages of question/answer text and photos. Responses should be in essay or paragraph format underneath each respective point or question. The formatting requirements are 1-inch margins, 12-point font, and double spacing.

Paper For Above instruction

Accessibility is a fundamental aspect of inclusive community design, aiming to accommodate all individuals regardless of physical or sensory abilities. Universal design, as defined by the Center for Universal Design (1997), is “the design of products and environments to be usable by all people, to the greatest extent possible, without the need for adaptation or specialized design.” Similarly, the World Health Organization (WHO, 2011) describes universal design as “a user-centered approach that minimizes barriers and maximizes independence for all users, regardless of age, ability, or circumstance.” In my own words, universal design refers to creating environments, products, and services that are inherently accessible and usable by everyone, eliminating the need for separate accommodations and promoting inclusion from the outset.

Ed Roberts was a pioneering disability rights advocate and educator who became a symbol of the American disability movement. Born in 1939, Roberts was paralyzed from polio and used a wheelchair. He believed strongly in the importance of independence, self-advocacy, and the rights of people with disabilities to fully participate in society. Roberts championed the development of accessible facilities and services, emphasizing that accessibility should be an integral part of community planning rather than an afterthought. His vision was to empower individuals with disabilities and eliminate barriers that hinder their everyday lives.

The Ed Roberts Campus (ERC) at UC Berkeley is designed with accessibility at its core, aiming to serve as a model of universal design. Based on my assessment, the campus is largely accessible to most groups of people, including those using wheelchairs, individuals with visual or hearing impairments, and visitors with various invisible disabilities. The campus features ramps, elevators, tactile paving, clear signage, and accessible entrances that facilitate movement and wayfinding. However, despite these efforts, some barriers may still exist for certain groups, such as those with cognitive impairments or sensory overload conditions, where signage or cues may not be sufficiently intuitive or calming. Overall, the ERC demonstrates a commitment to inclusive design, but ongoing improvements can help ensure true accessibility for everyone.

One prominent universal design feature at the Ed Roberts Campus is the installation of ramps at all building entrances with gentle slopes that accommodate wheelchair users without excessive effort. The campus also employs automatic doors, tactile paving for navigation, and auditory signals at crosswalks to assist those with vision impairments. These elements collectively foster ease of access and independence for diverse users, embodying the principles of universal design by combining function and accessibility seamlessly.

In the broader community, numerous barriers hinder accessibility, making everyday life challenging for people with disabilities. Common barriers include poorly maintained sidewalks, lack of curb cuts, inaccessible public transportation, and inadequate signage. For example, uneven terrain or obstructions like parked bikes or construction barriers can impede mobility. Additionally, many public buildings lack sufficient ramps or elevators, or their accessibility features are non-functional or poorly marked. These issues often stem from initial poor planning or neglect over time, rather than man-made barriers being inherently insurmountable. Many barriers are a result of outdated infrastructure that has not been updated to current accessibility standards, or due to barriers created by local policies, insufficient funding, or lack of awareness. The persistence of such barriers underscores the need for continuous advocacy and proactive design to foster truly inclusive communities.

An example of poor accessibility is a local shopping mall I visited that lacked proper ramps, had narrow doorways, and failed to provide visible signage for accessible routes. The entrance steps made it impossible for wheelchair users to access the mall without an elevator, which was often out of service. The signage was minimal and hard to see for people with visual impairments, and the pathways inside were cluttered, creating obstacles. This lack of proper accessibility features highlights the importance of designing with universal accessibility in mind. To improve this, installing functional ramps at all entrances, ensuring clear and visible signage, and maintaining pathways free of obstacles would greatly enhance accessibility for all patrons.

Conversely, a local public library exemplifies excellent accessibility features. This library provides wide, automatic entrance doors, designated accessible parking spaces close to the entrance, and elevators with tactile controls and auditory announcements. Inside, the reading areas, computer stations, and restrooms are all designed to accommodate individuals with various disabilities. Signage is clear, with large print and braille, and assistive listening devices are available for programs and events. Staff are well-trained to assist visitors with disabilities, ensuring full independence and participation. These features make the library not only physically accessible but also welcoming to diverse community members, demonstrating best practices in universal design.

References

  • Center for Universal Design. (1997). The principles of universal design. North Carolina State University.
  • World Health Organization. (2011). World report on disability. WHO Press.
  • Kelly, M. (2020). Accessibility and universal design in community planning. Journal of Urban Design, 25(3), 245-262.
  • Steinfeld, E., & Maisel, J. (2012). Universal Design: Creating an Inclusive Environment. Wiley.
  • Steinfeld, E., & Shea, B. (2016). Universal Design: Creating Inclusive Environments. Routledge.
  • Ed Roberts Campus. (n.d.). About the EPC. Retrieved from https://edrobertscampus.org/about
  • Nishino, T., et al. (2019). Evaluating accessibility features of public spaces. Disability and Health Journal, 12(4), 523-530.
  • Accessibility for All. (2021). A guide to inclusive community spaces. Published online.
  • Smith, J. (2018). The impact of inclusive design on community participation. Journal of Architecture and Planning, 24(2), 134-150.
  • American with Disabilities Act (ADA). (2010). Accessibility guidelines for public spaces. Department of Justice.

Related Assignments