An Ethical Dilemma Is One Where There Is No Clear Right Or W

An Ethical Dilemma Is One Where There Is No Clear Right Or Wrong Optio

An ethical dilemma is one where there is no clear right or wrong options, just consequences to decisions. Managers are often faced with ethical dilemmas on a daily basis. Understanding how to make ethical decisions is an important skill for all managers. Write a paper with 900 words explaining how to work with the following ethical dilemma: You continue to conduct due diligence required to make a sound decision on doing business in the subject country. A colleague of yours who has done business working with the country in question suggests that if you make a bribe to the government official involved, the deal will go much smoother. Without the bribe, you might lose the deal altogether. Your competitor is willing to make the bribe if you do not. This is a normal everyday practice in this country and is in no way illegal. Use the Project Management Institute (PMI) Guidelines for Ethical Decision Making link: for this assignment. Document each of the 5 steps to show how you made your final decision. What do you do, and why?

Paper For Above instruction

Making ethical decisions in a business context, especially when navigating complex cultural practices, requires a systematic approach that aligns with both ethical standards and organizational guidelines. The Project Management Institute (PMI) provides a structured five-step process for ethical decision-making, which guides managers through evaluating dilemmas to arrive at responsible actions. This paper explores how to approach an ethical dilemma involving whether to offer a bribe to secure a business deal in a foreign country, emphasizing the importance of each decision-making step as outlined by PMI.

The first step in the PMI ethical decision-making process is to recognize the existence of an ethical issue. In this scenario, the dilemma is whether to engage in a bribery act that is culturally accepted and technically legal in the host country but conflicts with personal and organizational ethical standards. Recognizing that this practice, while culturally normalized, raises questions about integrity, fairness, and compliance with international anti-corruption standards is essential. The dilemma is further complicated by competitive pressures; the competitor's willingness to bribe suggests a 'race to the bottom,' where unethical practices might be normalized or even expected.

The second step involves understanding the facts and identifying stakeholders. Here, facts include the local cultural norms, the legal status of the bribe, potential impacts on the organization’s reputation, and the ethical standards of the managers and the organization. Stakeholders encompass the company’s executives, employees, shareholders, local government officials, the community affected by the business practices, and the wider international community that condemns corruption. Recognizing these aspects helps in assessing the broader implications of the decision.

The third step in PMI’s model emphasizes evaluating options from an ethical perspective. This involves considering if making the bribe aligns with the company’s code of ethics, international anti-corruption laws (such as the Foreign Corrupt Practices Act), and organizational values of integrity and transparency. It also involves contemplating the potential short-term benefits against long-term reputational damage, legal risks, and the societal impact of perpetuating corrupt practices. An ethical evaluation might reveal that engaging in bribery tacitly endorses corruption, fosters unfair competition, and undermines the rule of law, despite its acceptance in the local environment.

The fourth step is to make an ethical decision. Based on the previous analysis, the decision-maker might determine that avoiding corruption aligns better with organizational values and international standards. This might mean continuing due diligence, exploring other legitimate ways to influence the decision—such as building relationships based on transparency, demonstrating value through quality, or negotiating without illicit payments. This decision could involve communicating the ethical stance to local partners and competitors, reinforcing the importance of integrity and sustainable business practices.

The fifth and final step involves acting and reflecting on the decision. Acting ethically may include declining to bribe, even if it means losing the deal, and documenting the reasons for refusal. Reflection entails recognizing the challenges involved, and understanding that in the long term, maintaining integrity enhances the organization’s reputation, stakeholder trust, and sustainability. This reflection could also lead to developing strategies for navigating similar future dilemmas, such as strengthening ethical training or establishing clearer policies about third-party negotiations.

In conclusion, navigating ethical dilemmas requires a structured approach grounded in clarity, stakeholder awareness, and adherence to core values. By applying PMI’s five-step ethical decision-making process, managers can make informed decisions that uphold integrity and promote ethical business practices, despite external pressures and local customs. Such a disciplined approach not only fosters ethical consistency but also contributes to the long-term success and reputation of the organization.

References

• Project Management Institute. (2017). A Guide to the Project Management Body of Knowledge (PMBOK® Guide) — Sixth Edition. Project Management Institute.
• Kaptein, M. (2011). Understanding unethical behavior: A perspective from ethical decision-making models. Journal of Business Ethics, 102(4), 515–533.
• Cox, J. B., & Cox, H. (2008). Business Ethics: Concepts and Cases. Pearson Education.
• Johnson, C. E. (2017). Meeting the Ethical Challenges of Leadership. Sage Publications.
• Subramaniam, N., et al. (2016). The impact of cultural norms on business ethics: A review. Journal of International Business Ethics, 9(2), 45–60.
• Transparency International. (2020). Corruption Perceptions Index 2020. Retrieved from https://www.transparency.org/en/cpi/2020/index/nzl
• Friedman, M. (1970). The social responsibility of business is to increase its profits. The New York Times Magazine.
• Husted, B. W. (1999). Managerial ethics and stakeholder outcomes: The case of outsourcing. Business Ethics Quarterly, 9(2), 283–310.
• Banerjee, S. B. (2008). Corporate social responsibility: The good, the bad and the ugly. Critical Sociology, 34(1), 51–73.
• Crane, A., & Matten, D. (2010). Business Ethics. Oxford University Press.