Analysis Of Electronic Health Records System By Chyterria Da ✓ Solved

Analysis Of Electronic Health Records System1chyterria Danielscapella

Analysis Of Electronic Health Records System1chyterria Danielscapella

Analyze the current state of an Electronic Health Records (EHR) system within a healthcare organization, including its compliance with relevant guidelines, the systems used, their evaluation, data management, and recommendations for improvement. Discuss how the EHR systems impact healthcare quality and patient safety, and propose strategies for effective implementation and optimization.

Sample Paper For Above instruction

Introduction

The adoption and effective utilization of Electronic Health Records (EHR) systems play a pivotal role in enhancing healthcare delivery, improving patient safety, and complying with regulatory standards. As the healthcare landscape evolves, organizations are required to align their EHR systems with federal and state regulations such as the Merit-based Incentive Payment System (MIPS) and Meaningful Use guidelines. This paper analyzes the current state of an EHR system within a healthcare organization, evaluates its functionalities and limitations, discusses data management practices, and provides evidence-based recommendations to optimize its performance for better clinical outcomes.

Current State of EHR Compliance and Implementation

The healthcare organization under review has incorporated various digital systems to support clinical functions, including Laboratory Information Systems (LIS), Computerized Physician Order Entry (CPOE), Picture Archiving and Communication System (PACS), and pharmacy systems. These systems are installed across different departments, aiming to streamline workflows and improve efficiency. For example, PACS facilitates imaging storage and retrieval, essential for diagnostic purposes, while LIS tracks laboratory samples, tests, and results (Data & Komorowski, 2017). Despite these technological advancements, the organization faces significant challenges in achieving comprehensive compliance with meaningful use guidelines and integrating its EHR systems fully.

Currently, the organization has technological support for ICU operations, including computer-based guidance and instructions for diagnosis and treatment. However, it has not replaced outdated diagnostic equipment nor integrated its EHR systems well enough to meet patient needs effectively. The lack of integration hampers seamless information sharing across departments, hindering the goals of coordinated care, data accuracy, and timely decision-making (Boonstra & Vos, 2018). Furthermore, the absence of alerts for drug interactions or warnings within the ambulatory EHR system exposes patients to potential medication errors, compromising safety and quality.

Evaluation of EHR Systems

The existing EHR system used in ambulatory services demonstrates critical limitations. Its segregation into departmental silos impedes efficient communication and data sharing, fundamental components for high-quality, patient-centered care. The system does not generate alerts for contraindications such as drug interactions, which are crucial for preventing adverse events. Moreover, the inability to communicate between departments results in fragmented care, increased risks of errors, and inefficiencies in workflow.

In contrast, LIS systems perform well, accurately recording and tracking laboratory information. The quality and trustworthiness of data from LIS support clinical decision-making, medication prescribing, and follow-up care. Nonetheless, integrating LIS with other systems would enhance data flow and operational efficiency further. An integrated, alert-enabled, and user-friendly EHR would significantly improve healthcare quality by facilitating timely interventions, reducing errors, and personalizing patient care (Boonstra & Vos, 2018).

Data Management and Regulatory Compliance

Data collection within the organization is primarily conducted through pre-registration forms managed by admission specialists, aligning with regulatory policies for patient data privacy and accuracy. Admission records serve as the main source of information, ensuring traceability and accountability. The organization meets regulatory policies by maintaining proper documentation during patient registration and data tracing.

However, sharing data beyond primary admission records remains limited due to the lack of integrated systems. Regular communication with public health agencies and reporting to patient registries are crucial for quality improvement and policy adherence. Maintaining transparency by providing patients with access to their data and ensuring secure, timely sharing among healthcare teams supports ethical standards and clinical effectiveness (Data & Komorowski, 2017).

Improving EHR Functionality and Healthcare Quality

To enhance the effectiveness of the EHR system, organizations should prioritize the integration of all departmental systems, establishing a unified platform capable of real-time data sharing. Incorporating alert systems for drug interactions, allergies, and other warnings is vital for medication safety. Ensuring that LIS, pharmacy, radiology, and clinical documentation systems communicate seamlessly can lead to more accurate diagnoses, personalized treatment plans, and improved patient outcomes.

Furthermore, leveraging data analytics and clinical decision support tools within the EHR can promote evidence-based practices. Clinical data should be prioritized over administrative claims for performance evaluation, fostering long-term compliance with incentive programs like MIPS. Creating transparent provider ratings, rewarding high-quality care, and setting achievable national performance targets are strategies that can drive continuous quality improvement (Meeks & Singh, 2019).

Recommendations for EHR Optimization

Effective EHR implementation requires systems to be user-friendly, support communication between departments, and provide comprehensive data access to clinicians and patients. The design should emphasize compatibility with existing workflows, minimize training time, and ensure ease of understanding.

Organizational strategies should include:

• Highlighting system compatibility with clinical practices.
• Identifying anticipated impacts of new models or practices.
• Engaging change agents and clinical leaders to champion EHR adoption.
• Incorporating reminders, prompts, and alerts within the system to guide clinical decision-making.
• Consistently communicating with public health entities and reporting requirements.
• Ensuring providers are trained adequately to maximize system benefits.

Adopting an incremental approach based on evidence and feedback supports sustainable improvements, fostering a culture of continuous learning and adaptation. The vision is to develop an integrated, alert-enabled, and user-centric EHR that empowers healthcare providers and enhances patient safety and quality care.

Conclusion

The current EHR systems within the organization exhibit significant strengths in laboratory and imaging data management but fall short in integration, alerting, and comprehensive usability. Addressing these gaps through system integration, functional enhancements, and user-centered design can greatly improve clinical outcomes, patient safety, and operational efficiency. Clear strategies involving stakeholder engagement, policy alignment, and continuous evaluation are necessary for successful EHR optimization. Ultimately, an effective EHR system is central to advancing healthcare quality in an increasingly digital era.

References

• Boonstra, A., & Vos, J. F. (2018). Implementing electronic health records in hospitals: a systematic literature review. BMC Health Services Research, 18(1), 370.
• Data, M. C., & Komorowski, M. (2017). Secondary analysis of electronic health records. Springer International Publishing.
• Meeks, D. W., & Singh, H. (2019). An analysis of electronic health record-related patient safety concerns. Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association, 26(6), 2117-2124.
• Boonstra, A., & Vos, J. F. (2018). Implementing electronic health records in hospitals: a systematic literature review. BMC Health Services Research, 18, 370.
• Data, M. C., & Komorowski, M. (2017). Secondary analysis of electronic health records. Springer.
• Meeks, D. W., & Singh, H. (2019). Patient safety and EHRs: implications for practice. Journal of Healthcare Quality, 41(2), 83-94.
• Evans, R. S. (2016). Electronic health records: then, now, and in the future. Pharmacoeconomics, 34(9), 857-865.
• DesRoches, C. M., et al. (2019). Electronic health record adoption in US hospitals: progress continues, but challenges persist. Health Affairs, 38(2), 254-261.
• Hersh, W. R. (2017). Health information technology: fallacies and facts. Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association, 24(2), 432-439.
• Adler-Milstein, J., et al. (2015). Electronic health records and healthcare quality: evidence from the US. eHealth.