Analyze The Declaration Of Independence And The U.S. Constit ✓ Solved

Analyze the Declaration of Independence and the U.S. Constitu

Analyze the Declaration of the Declaration of Independence. Explain the significance of these founding documents and how they altered previously accepted concepts of government.

What does it mean to be a part of We the People? What rights do We the People have and where do those rights come from? How has the term American changed from the founding of the nation through today?

Write in clear, standard academic English and include in-text citations and a reference page.

Paper For Above Instructions

Introduction

The Declaration of Independence and the U.S. Constitution stand at the center of American political life, yet they function as different kinds of founding texts: one articulates a philosophy of rights and legitimacy, the other establishes a practical framework for governing a diverse nation. Together, they mark a shift from monarchic rule and colonial charters to popular sovereignty constrained by law. The Declaration announces that all people possess certain inalienable rights and that governments derive their just powers from the consent of the governed; the Constitution then creates a durable structure intended to protect those rights while balancing competing interests within a federal republic (Armitage, 2007; Bailyn, 1967). The transformation from largely hierarchical authority to a system of limited powers with checks and balances is a defining feature of American political development (Rakove, 1996). These texts collectively reframed how citizens understood political authority, citizenship, and the purposes of government (Wood, 1993; Hofstadter, 1989).)

The Declaration of Independence: Philosophical Foundations and Claims

The Declaration asserts that individuals possess inherent rights—life, liberty, and the pursuit of happiness—and that government exists to secure those rights. Its rhetoric consigns tyrannical rule to illegitimacy, grounding political legitimacy in the consent of the governed rather than divine right or inherited privilege (Armitage, 2007). The document links political authority to universal principles, drawing on a broad tradition of natural law that would later influence constitutional design and civil rights debates (Beeman, 2009). In essence, the Declaration reframes political obligation as a voluntary agreement among people who recognize shared rights and mutual duties, redefining citizenship as a claim to equal moral standing under a government bound by the rule of law (The Federalist Papers; Bailyn, 1967).)

The Constitution: Institutionalize and Limit Government

Where the Declaration articulates ideals, the Constitution translates ideals into institutions. It establishes a federal system with enumerated powers, a separation of powers among legislative, executive, and judicial branches, and checks and balances designed to prevent the concentration of power (Rakove, 1996; The Federalist Papers, 1787–1788). The framers negotiated a system meant to endure changes in society while restraining government overreach. This framework formalizes the idea that governance should derive from the people, operate within constitutional limits, and be accountable through a system of mutual oversight (Beeman, 2009). The Constitution also codifies a structure for amendments, demonstrating an intention to adapt to future political developments while preserving core republican principles (Wood, 1993).)

We the People: Citizenship, Rights, and Source of Authority

“We the People” signals popular sovereignty and a collective national identity grounded in shared constitutional principles. The phrase centers citizens in the political order, yet its scope has evolved over time. Early constitutional arrangements effectively restricted franchise and citizenship to certain groups, while later amendments and legal developments expanded rights and participation—reflecting ongoing reinterpretations of who counts as a member of the political community (Armitage, 2007; Hofstadter, 1989). The Declaration’s natural-rights language set a standard for rights as universal and inalienable, while the Constitution’s enumerated rights, the Bill of Rights, and subsequent amendments ground protections in the legal framework of the United States (National Archives; The Federalist Papers). As the nation expanded, debates about who enjoys protections and how broadly rights apply—particularly for enslaved people, women, and immigrants—shaped American political evolution and the meaning of belonging within the American political tradition (Ellis, 2000; Bailyn, 1967).)

How the Term American Has Changed from the Founding Through Today

Originally, “American” referred to inhabitants of the new republic with ties to European settlers and the political claims of independence from Britain. Over time, the term broadened as citizenship, rights, and political participation were extended to wider populations through constitutional amendments, court decisions, and social struggles. The expansion of suffrage, civil rights movements, and ongoing debates about immigration and national identity have continually redefined what it means to be American. This evolution mirrors the dynamic relationship between the Declaration’s universal rights language and the Constitution’s procedural framework, showing how ideals and institutions interact to reshape national identity (Wood, 1993; Armitage, 2007).)

Conclusion

The Declaration and the Constitution together illuminate a trajectory from universal claims about rights and government legitimacy to a durable constitutional framework designed to protect those rights under a system of checks, balances, and federalism. The concept of “We the People” remains an aspirational standard—an invitation to expand citizenship and rights as the nation’s social and political realities change. Studying these documents reveals not only a historical break with previous concepts of government but also an ongoing, evolving conversation about who enjoys political power and how power is constrained and justified within the American political community (Rakove, 1996; Bailyn, 1967; Beeman, 2009).)

References

• National Archives. The Declaration of Independence. (1776). Retrieved from https://www.archives.gov/founding-docs/declaration-transcript
• National Archives. The Constitution of the United States. (1787). Retrieved from https://www.archives.gov/founding-docs/constitution-transcript
• Bailyn, Bernard. The Ideological Origins of the American Revolution. Belknap Press, 1967.
• Rakove, Jack N. Original Meanings: Politics and Ideas in the Making of the Constitution. Cambridge University Press, 1996.
• Wood, Gordon S. The Radicalism of the American Revolution. Vintage, 1993.
• Ellis, Joseph J. Founding Brothers: The Revolutionary Generation. Alfred A. Knopf, 2000.
• Beeman, Richard. Plain, Honest Men: The Making of the American Constitution. Random House, 2009.
• Armitage, David. The Declaration of Independence: A Global History. Harvard University Press, 2007.
• The Federalist Papers. Edited by Clinton Rossiter. Penguin Books, 1961.
• Hofstadter, Richard. The American Political Tradition and the Men Who Made It. Vintage, 1989.