The Task Is To Analyze A Given Article Using Gibbs Reflectiv ✓ Solved

The Task Is To Analyze A Given Article Using Gibbs Reflective Cycle

The task is to analyze a given article using Gibb’s reflective cycle. You have to reflect on past professional experience to show your understanding of the article. While reflecting on your experience, you will also be required to define, explain and analyze two given concepts from the syllabus. This way, you will be linking the given article with your experience and with two given concepts from the textbook (the two concepts are LFS framework and the dark side of leadership ).

Sample Paper For Above instruction

Introduction

The process of analyzing a scholarly article through Gibbs’ reflective cycle provides an effective method for integrating theory with personal professional experience. This reflective approach allows for a deeper understanding of the article’s content, especially when concepts such as the LFS framework and the dark side of leadership are incorporated. In this paper, I will discuss my past professional experiences in relation to these concepts and demonstrate how they offer insights into leadership dynamics within organizational settings.

Understanding Gibbs’ Reflective Cycle

Gibbs’ reflective cycle is a systematic model that facilitates reflective thinking through six stages: description, feelings, evaluation, analysis, conclusion, and action plan (Gibbs, 1988). This framework enables practitioners and students to critically examine their experiences and derive meaningful insights. Applying this cycle to analyze an article promotes a structured reflection that links theory with real-world practice, fostering a comprehensive understanding of complex leadership issues.

Summary of the Article

The article under review explores the multifaceted nature of leadership, emphasizing both positive and negative aspects. It discusses the importance of ethical leadership while acknowledging the existence of the ‘dark side’— traits and behaviors that can undermine organizational health (Schyns & Schilling, 2013). The article advocates for a balanced perspective, recognizing that leadership can have both constructive and destructive impacts, depending on the interaction of individual traits and contextual factors.

Personal Reflection and Experience

Reflecting on my professional journey, I have observed instances where leadership positively influenced team performance and morale. Conversely, I also encountered situations where leadership behaviors veered into negative territory, resulting in employee dissatisfaction and organizational setbacks. These personal observations resonate with the article’s discussion of both the luminous and dark aspects of leadership, highlighting the importance of self-awareness and ethical conduct.

Application of the LFS Framework

The LFS framework, which stands for Leadership, Followers, and Situation, provides a comprehensive lens to evaluate leadership effectiveness (Uhl-Bien, 2006). It posits that leadership is a dynamic process shaped by the interaction of these three components. In my experience, effective leadership emerged when leaders adapted their behaviors to followers’ needs and contextual demands. For example, transformational leaders who tailored their approach fostered higher engagement, aligning with the LFS framework’s emphasis on situational adaptability.

The Dark Side of Leadership in Practice

The dark side of leadership encompasses traits such as narcissism, Machiavellianism, and psychopathy, which can manifest in manipulation, unethical behavior, or authoritarianism (Schyns & Schilling, 2013). I have observed leaders exhibiting these traits, notably in high-pressure environments, where their misguided pursuit of power resulted in toxic cultures. Recognizing these traits allows organizations to implement screening and development strategies to mitigate negative influences.

Analysis and Integration of Concepts

Analyzing the article through the lens of the LFS framework and the dark side of leadership deepens understanding of how leadership operates in complex environments. While the LFS framework advocates for situational responsiveness, the dark side highlights the pitfalls of neglecting ethical considerations. My personal experiences validate that effective leadership depends on self-awareness, ethical standards, and situational intelligence.

Conclusion

Applying Gibbs’ reflective cycle to analyze the article facilitates a nuanced understanding of leadership’s dual nature. Recognizing the significance of the LFS framework underscores the importance of contextual responsiveness, while awareness of the dark side warns against potential ethical lapses. Personal reflection confirms that leadership development must incorporate self-awareness, ethical integrity, and adaptability.

Action Plan

Moving forward, I intend to enhance my leadership skills by engaging in continuous self-reflection aligned with Gibbs’ model. I will prioritize ethical decision-making and situational awareness, drawing from the concepts discussed. Additionally, I will seek feedback and mentorship to better recognize and mitigate the dark side traits in myself and others, fostering healthier organizational environments.

References

• Gibbs, G. (1988). Learning by doing: A guide to teaching and learning methods. Oxford Polytechnic.
• Schyns, B., & Schilling, J. (2013). How Bad Are the 'Dark Side' and the 'Bright Side' of Leadership? The Journal of Leadership & Organizational Studies, 20(1), 57-67.
• Uhl-Bien, M. (2006). Relational Leadership Development. The Leadership Quarterly, 17(5), 654-676.
• Northouse, P. G. (2018). Leadership: Theory and Practice. Sage publications.
• Kellerman, B. (2004). Bad Leadership: What It Is, How It Matters, and How to Fix It. Harvard Business Review Press.
• Schriesheim, C. A., & Neider, L. L. (Eds.). (2014). Transformational and Charismatic Leadership: The Road Ahead. Information Age Publishing.
• Avolio, B. J., & Bass, B. M. (2004). Multifactor Leadership Questionnaire Manual. Mind Garden.
• Hoch, J. E., & Dulebohn, J. H. (2017). Team personality composition, emergent leadership, and shared leadership in virtual teams: A theoretical framework. Group & Organization Management, 42(3), 331-360.
• Carroll, S. J. (2018). The Dark Side of Leadership: A Practical Guide to Leadership Chaos, Conflict and Toxicity. Routledge.
• Gray, C. F. (2018). Leadership in organizations. Routledge.