Analyze The Main Clients And Stakeholders (Restaurants, Cust

Analyze the main clients and stakeholders (restaurants, customers, suppliers) and build a research method to assess the actual picture of satisfaction of all stockholders

Taska Restaurant is interested in developing a new grading system aimed at enhancing service quality, ensuring fairness across staff members, and fostering potential regional partnerships. To effectively implement this grading system, it is essential to comprehend the needs and satisfaction levels of all stakeholders involved, including customers, staff, and suppliers. This involves conducting a comprehensive analysis of their expectations, perceptions, and experiences within the current operational framework. Building a robust research methodology to assess stakeholder satisfaction will enable the restaurant to tailor the grading system to meet actual needs, thereby increasing its effectiveness and acceptance.

The primary step involves identifying and understanding each stakeholder group's unique perspectives. Customers seek high-quality service, consistent food standards, and a welcoming atmosphere, whereas staff members look for fair evaluation, recognition, and equitable treatment. Suppliers, on the other hand, focus on timely payments, transparent communication, and mutual growth opportunities. Recognizing these divergent interests allows for designing targeted research instruments that capture specific feedback from each stakeholder group.

To evaluate current satisfaction levels, a mixed-methods research approach is recommended. Quantitative surveys can provide measurable data, while qualitative methods such as interviews and focus groups offer deeper insights into stakeholder experiences and perceptions.

For customers, structured questionnaires could assess satisfaction with food quality, service efficiency, ambiance, and overall experience. These surveys should be distributed both physically and digitally to maximize reach and include Likert-scale questions to quantify satisfaction levels. Data analysis of survey responses can identify patterns, strengths, and areas requiring improvement.

Staff satisfaction can be evaluated through anonymous questionnaires that cover aspects like perceived fairness of assessments, workload, motivation, and communication with management. Complementary focus group discussions can reveal underlying issues, opinions, and suggestions for improving the grading criteria. This process encourages openness and provides rich qualitative data.

Supply chain stakeholders can be surveyed through interviews and structured feedback forms, focusing on their relationship with the restaurant, timeliness of payments, clarity of expectations, and opportunities for collaboration. Regular communication channels—such as supplier feedback meetings—can supplement survey data and foster ongoing stakeholder engagement.

The research methodology also incorporates triangulation, where data from different sources and methods are cross-verified. This enhances the reliability and validity of the findings. Additionally, timing of the research is crucial—initial assessments should be conducted pre-implementation, followed by periodic reviews post-implementation to monitor changes in satisfaction levels over time.

Data collected through these methods will offer a comprehensive picture of stakeholder satisfaction, highlighting critical areas for the new grading system to address. This evidence-based approach ensures that the grading system aligns with stakeholder expectations, increasing the likelihood of successful adoption and sustainable improvements in service quality.

References

• Babbie, E. (2010). The Practice of Social Research. 12th ed. Belmont, CA: Wadsworth.
• Creswell, J. W. (2014). Research Design: Qualitative, Quantitative, and Mixed Methods Approaches. 4th ed. Sage Publications.
• Gray, D. E. (2014). Doing Research in the Business World. 3rd ed. Sage Publications.
• Kaplan, R. S., & Norton, D. P. (1992). The Balanced Scorecard: Measures that Drive Performance. Harvard Business Review, 70(1), 71-79.
• Malhotra, N. K., & Birks, D. F. (2007). Marketing Research: An Applied Approach. 3rd ed. Pearson Education.
• Patton, M. Q. (2002). Qualitative Research & Evaluation Methods. 3rd ed. Sage Publications.
• Saunders, M., Lewis, P., & Thornhill, A. (2016). Research Methods for Business Students. 7th ed. Pearson Education.
• Venkatesh, V., et al. (2012). Consumer Acceptance and Use of Information Technology: Extending the Unified Theory of Acceptance and Use of Technology. MIS Quarterly, 36(1), 157-178.
• Yin, R. K. (2013). Case Study Research: Design and Methods. 5th ed. Sage Publications.
• Zikmund, W. G., et al. (2010). Business Research Methods. 8th ed. Cengage Learning.