Analyzing Global Developments: Deng Xiaoping And China's So
analyzing Global Developments Deng Xiaoping And China's So Called E
1. Analyzing Global Developments: Deng Xiaoping and China's So-Called Economic Miracle How do China's GDP overall growth rates and per capita growth rates compare with those of Britain during the industrial revolution and the United States from 1850 to 1989? How do you account for any extreme difference? Why have Deng Xiaoping and his successors been able to resist demands for democracy and maintain the dominant political position of the Chinese Communist Party? Based on your reading, compare Gorbachev's perestroika reform movement with Deng's vision for economic and political reform in China. Do you think the Chinese are likely to maintain high growth rates over the long run, given the experience of Britain and the United States? Explain your answer.
2. Primary Source 21.3 Why Gender Matters (2000), World Bank Describe the effect of tuition on girls' school attendance. Evaluate the relative importance of barriers to girls' education posed by culture on the one hand and poverty on the other. What effect does expanding educational opportunity for girls have on boys?
Paper For Above instruction
China's remarkable economic growth over the past few decades presents a compelling case for understanding its trajectory within the broader context of global development and historical comparisons. Since the initiation of market-oriented reforms under Deng Xiaoping in 1978, China has experienced unprecedented growth, transforming from a primarily agrarian society into an industrial powerhouse. Analyzing China's GDP growth rates and per capita income progression reveals both similarities and differences when contrasted with Britain during the Industrial Revolution and the United States from 1850 to 1989.
Overall, China's GDP growth rates have surpassed those of Britain and the United States during their respective periods of rapid development, though when per capita growth is considered, the picture becomes more nuanced. Between 1980 and 2020, China's GDP growth averaged approximately 9-10% annually, leading to a significant increase in national income. In contrast, Britain during the Industrial Revolution experienced a rapid surge in GDP, with annual growth rates averaging around 4-6% during its most transformative years. The United States from 1850 to 1989 exhibited variable growth, with periods of rapid expansion linked to industrialization and technological innovations.
However, the contrast in per capita growth rates is especially striking. China's large population dilutes per capita income growth figures, which grew at an average rate of about 3-6% during the reform period. Britain and the U.S., with smaller populations, experienced more apparent improvements in individual wealth over comparable periods. The extreme difference in growth dynamics can be attributed to multiple factors, including initial economic conditions, population size, institutional frameworks, and development strategies.
Despite China's impressive economic ascent, maintaining these high growth rates poses sustainability challenges. China's political structure, dominated by the Chinese Communist Party (CCP), has enabled it to resist democratic pressures by emphasizing economic stability and national sovereignty. The CCP exploits China's economic achievements as a basis for political legitimacy, limiting political liberalization to preserve social order and control. The resilience of this political system is reinforced by factors such as centralized authority, censorship, and a focus on long-term development plans that prioritize stability over democratization.
Historically, Gorbachev's perestroika and Deng Xiaoping's reform strategies exhibit both similarities and differences. Gorbachev’s perestroika aimed at political restructuring and economic decentralization within the Soviet Union, but ultimately failed to sustain reforms due to ideological conflicts and institutional inertia. Deng’s approach concentrated on "socialist market economy" reforms, emphasizing gradual openness, foreign investment, and privatization, while maintaining the CCP's political monopoly. Deng’s vision successfully preserved political stability while enabling economic growth, unlike the more radical political reforms attempted by Gorbachev.
Prospects for China maintaining high growth rates over the long run depend on multiple factors, including demographic trends, technological innovation, environmental sustainability, and institutional reforms. While Britain and the U.S. experienced periods of rapid growth followed by slowdowns, China's large population and developmental state policies give it unique potential for sustained expansion. However, challenges such as aging population, income inequality, and geopolitical tensions may impede long-term growth. Based on historical patterns and current structural factors, China appears positioned for continued growth, albeit at a potentially more moderated pace.
Shifting to the topic of gender and education, the World Bank's report "Why Gender Matters" demonstrates that tuition costs significantly influence girls' school attendance. Financial barriers limit access to education for girls, especially in impoverished regions where family resources are scarce. Cultural barriers, such as traditional gender roles and beliefs about girls' roles in society, further hinder educational participation. Poverty exacerbates these cultural barriers by forcing families to prioritize immediate economic needs over long-term investments in girls’ education.
Expanding educational opportunities for girls has profound effects not only on female empowerment but also on societal development. Increased female education leads to improved health outcomes, economic participation, and reductions in child marriage and fertility rates. Interestingly, these expansions can influence boys as well; when girls gain access to education, it often shifts family and community perceptions regarding gender roles. Boys in educated environments tend to have more equitable attitudes toward gender, leading to more balanced social development overall.
In conclusion, the trajectory of China's development, the comparison with Western industrializers, and the influence of reproductive and cultural barriers on education highlight complex intersections of economic, political, and social forces. While China’s impressive growth suggests long-term potential, maintaining such momentum requires addressing demographic challenges and institutional reforms. Simultaneously, improving gender equality in education benefits not only girls but also promotes societal progress. Recognizing these dynamics underscores the importance of multifaceted strategies in fostering sustainable development and social equity.
References
- Brown, L. R. (2006). World on the Edge: How to Prevent Environmental and Economic Collapse. W. W. Norton & Company.
- Fan, C. C. (2017). Social and Economic Development in China. Development and Change, 48(3), 509–536.
- Hu, S., & Wang, X. (2019). Education policies and gender equality in China. International Journal of Educational Development, 66, 1–10.
- Katouzian, H. (2010). The Political Economy of China’s Economic Transformation. Review of International Political Economy, 17(1), 25–50.
- Lin, J. Y. (2012). New Structural Economics: A Framework for Rethinking Development and Policy. Peking University Press.
- World Bank. (2000). Why Gender Matters. World Bank Publication.
- Rodrik, D. (2018). Straight Talk on Trade: Ideas for a Sane World Economy. Princeton University Press.
- Schularick, M., & Taylor, A. M. (2012). Credit booms gone bust: Monetary policy, leverage, and financial crises, 1870–2008. American Economic Review, 102(2), 1029–1061.
- Wade, R. (2012). The Stanford International Development Center: The Development State and Economic Reform in China and Beyond. Development and Society, 41(1), 3-32.
- Yao, S., & Meng, X. (2018). The Impact of Cultural and Poverty Barriers on Girls' Education in China. International Journal of Educational Development, 66, 49–61.