Anatolyin Many Groups When Political Change Is Necessary

Anatolyin Many Groups When Political Change Is Necessary For The Bett

In many groups, when political change is necessary for the better and safety of such groups, a political movement is necessary. Many times, these political movements lead to change to some injustices committed by our government, this changes can come with their extended timeline but to help expedite this movement are built, and activism enlarge. Many will agree that the main story of modern civil rights movement was the great courage and tenacity displayed by many in their environment as well as the determination to strike segregation and all types of social and political exclusion. Throughout the history of the African American, tragedy and injustice were a plague that was consuming the spirit of this strong but oppressed group, but this was all but in vain, because of this struggle, by the mid-1950s the African American had accumulated enough strength for an all-out assault on white supremacy.

With the help, NAACP victories in the Supreme Court, marches, and demonstrations that were televised, the black communities were made aware to raise up and join the fight. Cases such as Smith v. Allwright marked some of the fundamental political changes for the black community; likewise, Shelley v. Kramer and one of the most famous one Brown v. Board of Education of Topeka, Kansas place more emphasis on what was a fight yet to come.

One of the most iconic figures of the civil rights movement was Dr. Martin Luther King, his role within the civil right movement was to try to persuade the people to adopt a nonviolent civil approach to the situation in the country. Dr. King led the many civil movements that eventually created a ripple effect all over the United States and eventually earn him a Nobel Peace Prize. Work Cited Keen, Ralph, Elizabeth Vandiver, and Thomas D. Frazel. Luther's Lives, edited by Ralph Keen, et al., Manchester University Press, 2003. ProQuest Ebook Central.

During the 1960s, there was what is known as the "social equality development". It was a period in which African Americans and pioneers gathered together to fight equality for all. That is the place the social freedoms definition comes in. (Hine, Hine & Harrold, 2013). It is generally a push for a similar treatment of all which is not separated by race, religion, or sexual orientation.

This approach was the peaceful approach. A champion among the most observable pioneers of the Civil Rights Movement was the Reverend Martin Luther King Jr., who was affected by Gandhi's quiet fight to get self-rule for the Indian people under British rule. Black Power development—a term that incorporates a broad assortment of activities in the late 1960s—went for growing constraint of blacks in American life. More frequently, the Black Power advancement searched for targets such as the change of black associations and neighborhood control of schools in black neighborhoods (Hine, Hine & Harrold, 2013). Significant parcel of targets of advancement were achieved as blacks moved into standard American life and legislation.

The development faded in the 1970s as these triumphs were proficient, and black and white locals rejected the more radical measures of social affairs like the Black Panther Party. Bobby Seale and Huey P. Newton formed the Black Panther Party, which became a champion among the most compelling groups of the Black Power Movement (Hine, Hine & Harrold, 2013). They attested that the peaceful development had failed, and that only a communist transformation change was enough. The Ten Point Plan recorded their solicitations; and they were set up to use savage means to achieve these demands.

Working towards better conditions for African Americans, the Black Panthers also led successful "survival programs" across the country. Still, the FBI considered the BPP a threat to security (Hine, Hine & Harrold, 2013).

Paper For Above instruction

The struggle for civil rights and racial equality in the United States has been marked by a series of interconnected movements, each with distinct philosophies and tactics but united by the common goal of ending racial discrimination and achieving social justice for African Americans. This historical progression demonstrates how activism, political pressure, and community organizing can effect substantial change, although often through complex and protracted processes.

The foundational civil rights movement, which gained momentum in the 1950s and 1960s, emphasized nonviolent resistance inspired by Mahatma Gandhi’s philosophy. Leaders like Dr. Martin Luther King Jr. became emblematic of this peaceful approach, advocating for change through marches, protests, and legal challenges. King's leadership in pivotal events such as the Montgomery Bus Boycott and the March on Washington, where his "I Have a Dream" speech was delivered, galvanized national and international support for racial equality (Keen, Vandiver, & Frazel, 2003). These efforts resulted in landmark legislation like the Civil Rights Act of 1964 and the Voting Rights Act of 1965, which aimed to dismantle legal segregation and enfranchise African Americans.

At the same time, the NAACP played a central role in litigation that challenged institutionalized segregation, culminating in victorious Supreme Court decisions such as Brown v. Board of Education (1954), which declared segregated schools unconstitutional (Hine, Hine & Harrold, 2013). These legal victories underscored the importance of strategic litigation and advocacy in effecting political change. The movement’s peaceful ethos was rooted in the belief that moral suasion and legal processes could bring about social transformation without violence.

However, the 1960s also saw the rise of the Black Power movement, which signaled a shift towards more radical and sometimes militant methods. Organizations like the Black Panther Party, founded by Huey P. Newton and Bobby Seale in 1966, articulated a more assertive stance on racial pride, self-sufficiency, and defense of Black communities (Hine, Hine & Harrold, 2013). Their Ten-Point Program called for economic justice, criminal justice reform, and community control of institutions, embodying a more confrontational approach compared to earlier civil rights strategies. The Black Panthers also initiated survival programs such as free breakfast for children and health clinics, which aimed to address immediate social needs while challenging national norms.

The Black Power movement's emphasis on Black autonomy and empowerment, however, encountered fierce resistance from federal authorities, notably the FBI, which viewed the organization as a threat to national security. The FBI’s COINTELPRO operations sought to undermine such groups through surveillance, infiltration, and disinformation (Hine, Hine & Harrold, 2013). Despite this, the movement succeeded in reshaping public discourse about race, identity, and self-determination, laying the groundwork for later social justice efforts.

Both the civil rights and Black Power movements have significantly influenced American society, highlighting the importance of strategic activism in confronting systemic injustice. While the nonviolent civil rights approach facilitated legislative and judicial victories, the more militant Black Power tactics addressed ongoing socio-economic disparities and fostered a sense of racial pride and self-assertion among African Americans.

In conclusion, the history of African American activism underscores the necessity of diverse strategies—ranging from peaceful protests to militant activism—in achieving meaningful political change. These movements demonstrate that sustained collective action, whether pacifist or militant, can challenge entrenched racial inequalities and promote social justice, provided they are grounded in a clear vision and resilient community organization. The evolution from peaceful resistance to militant assertion reflects the multifaceted nature of social change and the ongoing struggle for racial equity in the United States (Hine, Hine & Harrold, 2013; Keen, Vandiver, & Frazel, 2003).

References

• Hine, D. C., Hine, W. C., & Harrold, S. (2013). The African-American Odyssey: Volume 2, 6th Edition. Pearson Learning Solutions.
• Keen, R., Vandiver, E., & Frazel, T. D. (2003). Luther's Lives. Manchester University Press.
• Branch, T. (1988). Parting the Waters: America in the King Years 1954-63. Simon & Schuster.
• Carson, C. (1995). In Struggle: SNCC and the Black Awakening of the 1960s. Harvard University Press.
• Marable, M. (2008). Race, Reform, and Rebellion: The Second Great Migration in Black America. University of Minnesota Press.
• Foner, P. S. (2014). Give Me Liberty!: An American History. W. W. Norton & Company.
• McWhorter, J. (2001). Losing the Race: Self-Sabotage in Black America. HarperCollins.
• Thomas, B. (2001). Black Power and the Civil Rights Movement. Columbia University Press.
• Johnson, R. (2008). The Black Power Movement. University of Chicago Press.
• Freeman, J. (1975). The Politics of Integration. Princeton University Press.