Annotated Bibliography Rubric 50 Points Written Criteria

Annotated Bibliography Rubric50 Ptswritten Criteriaexemplary10 Points

Develop an annotated bibliography based on the provided health information management and health IT materials. Your annotated bibliography should include bibliographical information of each source, a concise summary, an evaluation of the article’s credibility and purpose, and a reflection on how the source applies to current or future practice. Ensure proper APA formatting with minimal errors, and critically analyze each source’s contribution to understanding health IT, EHRs, value-based care, or related concepts cited in the provided content.

Paper For Above instruction

The development of an annotated bibliography is a critical academic exercise that requires a systematic approach to evaluating health information management sources. By analyzing the provided materials on health IT, EHRs, and value-based care, it is essential to synthesize information that clarifies the significance, credibility, and practical implications of each source for health IT professionals and clinicians.

Bibliographical Information

American Health Information Management Association. (2017). Health IT and EHRs: Principles and Practice, Sixth Edition. Chapter 4: Health IT Goal Setting and Measuring the Impact on Healthcare Value. American Health Information Management Association.

Summary of Article

This chapter explores how health IT and Electronic Health Records (EHRs) can improve healthcare. It emphasizes the importance of setting clear, achievable goals—especially SMART goals—that guide implementation efforts and maximize value. The chapter discusses the benefits of health IT, such as increased efficiency and improved patient safety, while acknowledging challenges like unintended consequences and costs. It highlights the significance of monitoring and measuring outcomes using quantitative and qualitative metrics to assess benefits and inform continuous improvement. The discussion extends to the impact of health IT on the Triple Aim goals—enhancing patient experience, improving population health, and reducing costs—which together contribute to the establishment of a learning health system.

Evaluation of Article

This article from the American Health Information Management Association is a credible and authoritative source based on current healthcare principles. It is well organized, with clear delineation of key concepts such as goal setting, measurement, and benefits realization. The content aligns with evidence-based practices and emphasizes the importance of strategic planning and stakeholder education in EHR implementation. Its focus on SMART goals and change management lends practical value for healthcare administrators and clinicians overseeing health IT projects. Moreover, the inclusion of national standards and measures, like those from the National Quality Forum, provides context for evaluating clinical and financial outcomes, reinforcing its credibility and relevance.

Reflection on Application to Practice

This source underscores the necessity of strategic goal setting and rigorous measurement to ensure health IT investments deliver value. As a future healthcare professional, understanding the principles of SMART goals and continuous monitoring will enable me to participate effectively in EHR implementation and optimization projects. It also highlights the importance of stakeholder education to set realistic expectations, reducing disappointment and enhancing engagement. Applying these principles can directly impact organizational success by ensuring technology supports clinical workflows, improves patient outcomes, and aligns with financial objectives. Additionally, the emphasis on data-driven decision-making will be critical in fostering a learning environment that adapts to evolving healthcare needs.

Moreover, this chapter's insights into balancing benefits and addressing unintended consequences will inform my approach to technology adoption, emphasizing proactive change management and stakeholder involvement. As health systems continue transitioning from volume to value, an understanding of goal setting and outcome measurement will guide practical efforts to improve care quality, safety, and efficiency through health IT initiatives.

References

  • American Health Information Management Association. (2017). Health IT and EHRs: Principles and Practice, Sixth Edition. American Health Information Management Association.
  • Adler-Milstein, J., & Jha, A. K. (2017). HITECH Act and Electronic Health Record Adoption in the US. JAMA, 317(9), 917-918.
  • Bright, T. J., et al. (2012). Effect of electronic health records on healthcare quality: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Annals of Internal Medicine, 157(8), 537-546.
  • DesRoches, C. M., et al. (2013). Electronic health records in ambulatory care — a national survey of physicians. New England Journal of Medicine, 359(1), 50–60.
  • Furukawa, M. F., et al. (2014). Adoption of electronic health records by community health centers. American Journal of Preventive Medicine, 46(1), 10-18.
  • Jha, A. K., et al. (2010). The easy case for EHRs: opportunities and challenges for primary care. Health Affairs, 29(4), 599–606.
  • Powell, A. E., et al. (2014). Health Information Technology and Quality Improvement: Focused on the Triple Aim. Healthcare Management Review, 39(2), 114-124.
  • Rudin, R. S., et al. (2013). Meaningful use of electronic health records: the state of the evidence. Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality.
  • Steele, M., & Hysong, S. (2014). Improvement in patient safety and quality: the role of health information technology. JAMA Surgery, 149(3), 212-219.
  • Vest, J. R., & Gamm, L. D. (2010). Health information exchange: persistent challenges and barriers experience. JAMA, 304(14), 1-2.

Related Assignments