APA Format: 2 Pages, 3 References From Walden Univers 919751

APA Format 2 Pages Long 3 References 1 From Walden University Libraryp

Assessing the effectiveness of educational programs in healthcare is critical to ensure quality patient care and promote continuous professional development among nurses. Evaluation models serve as systematic frameworks to determine the value, quality, and impact of educational interventions. The process of evaluation, as defined by Keating and DeBoor (2018), involves determining the worth of an educational program. Billings and Halstead (2016) emphasize that evaluation encompasses various methods for measuring the effectiveness of educational content, delivery, and outcomes. Selecting an appropriate evaluation model is crucial for nursing educators striving to improve teaching strategies and patient outcomes.

Among the numerous models available, the RSA Model and the CURRICULUM Model are noteworthy. The RSA Model, developed by Roberta Straessle Abruzzese, adopts a hierarchical triangle approach, progressing from process evaluation to content, outcome, and ultimately, impact evaluation (DeSilets, 2010). This model allows educators to systematically assess each level, starting with the processes involved in delivering the education, moving to whether the content is appropriate, evaluating the outcomes achieved, and finally measuring the broader impact on practice and patient care. Its straightforward structure aids in identifying specific strengths and areas for improvement within an educational program.

Alternatively, the CURRICULUM Model emphasizes the importance of understanding the context in which education occurs, the content delivered, and the conduct or implementation of the program (Kalb, 2009). It involves a comprehensive process—considering organizational context, understanding learner needs, setting clear goals and objectives, selecting appropriate methods and resources, leading implementation, undertaking evaluation, and monitoring outcomes. This holistic approach ensures that all aspects influencing educational effectiveness are addressed, fostering a tailored and responsive strategy for nursing education.

While these models are valuable, our team favors integrating the Kirkpatrick Evaluation Model with the Shared Governance Model at Moses Cone Hospital. The Kirkpatrick Model evaluates four levels: reaction, learning, behavior, and results (Billings & Halstead, 2016). This multi-tiered framework allows for detailed assessment—from how participants feel about the training to tangible changes in nursing practice and patient outcomes. For example, reaction assessment gathers immediate feedback, while measuring behavior and results provides insight into long-term impacts on clinical practice. Combining this with the hospital's existing Shared Governance Model enhances engagement and accountability among nursing staff, aligning educational outcomes with organizational goals (Nursing World, 2004).

The Shared Governance Model promotes nurse autonomy and involvement in decision-making processes, fostering a culture of shared responsibility for quality care (Nursing World, 2004). This approach supports the ongoing evaluation of educational initiatives by encouraging feedback and collaborative analysis of outcomes. As Billings and Halstead (2016) highlight, ignoring evaluation results undermines the purpose of assessment; hence, continuous feedback loops are vital. By applying the Kirkpatrick Model within this framework, nurse educators can systematically measure the effectiveness of training in improving practice, patient safety, and organizational performance, ensuring that educational investments translate into meaningful clinical improvements.

In conclusion, selecting an appropriate evaluation model is essential for the continuous improvement of nursing education programs. The combination of the Kirkpatrick Evaluation Model and the Shared Governance Model offers a comprehensive approach to assess and enhance educational effectiveness in healthcare settings. This integrated framework facilitates evidence-based decision-making, promotes nurse engagement, and ultimately contributes to improved patient outcomes. Future research should focus on refining these models and exploring innovative evaluation techniques to better serve the evolving needs of healthcare organizations and their nursing staff.

References

• Billings, D. M., & Halstead, J. A. (2016). Teaching in nursing: A guide for faculty (5th ed.). Elsevier.
• DeSilets, L. D. (2010). Another look at evaluation models. The Journal of Continuing Education in Nursing, 41(1), 12-13. https://doi.org/10.3928/00220124-20100104-02
• Kalb, K. A. (2009). The three Cs model: The context, content, and conduct of nursing education. Nursing Education Perspectives, 30(3), 146-150.
• Keating, S. B., & DeBoor, S. S. (2018). Curriculum development and evaluation in nursing education (4th ed.). Springer.
• Nursing World. (2004). Shared governance models: The theory, practice, and evidence. American Nurses Association. https://www.nursingworld.org