Applied Reflective Questions (ARQs) Due Date: November 1 ✓ Solved

Applied Reflective Questions (ARQs) Due Date: November 1st Points: 10 points

Considering network models of knowledge, name the effect that took place in Alecto’s mind as she encountered information about muggles. Describe how the experiences she had led to her beliefs.

What type of cognitive effect are we seeing when Alecto meets Frank, someone she knows very little about, for the first time ever? (Hint: I know she’s being “prejudiced”, so I’m not asking that).

Suppose you gave Alecto a book or pamphlet about muggle history and behavior. It contains both positive and negative information about them.

a. What does memory integration say is likely to happen with the positive and negative information you present her?

Given everything we have learned about memory and knowledge up to this point, what would be the most effective way to change her negative stereotypes about muggles?

Paper For Above Instructions

The process of how individuals like Alecto Carrow develop and maintain prejudicial beliefs can be effectively understood through cognitive models, particularly network models of knowledge. In these models, schemas—organized knowledge structures—are central. When Alecto first encountered information about muggles—such as tales of greed and violence—these experiences activated specific nodes within her mental network. The associative links between these nodes and her existing schemas about morality and trust strengthened, leading her to form robust beliefs that all muggles are inherently bad. This phenomenon is known as spread of activation, which occurs when specific experiences stimulate related nodes in the network, thereby reinforcing her prejudicial stereotypes. Her continuous exposure to negative stories about muggles created a self-reinforcing network—a cycle where new information aligned with her existing beliefs, making her misconceptions more durable and resistant to change.

The encounter with Frank exemplifies a different cognitive effect—heuristic processing—where Alecto quickly forms impressions based on minimal information. Because she strongly associates muggles with negative traits, her initial judgment of Frank is influenced more by her existing knowledge structure than by actual evidence about him as an individual. This automatic judgment demonstrates confirmation bias, where her brain seeks out information that supports her preconceived notions, ignoring any disconfirming evidence. Although this process facilitates rapid decision-making, it also sustains prejudice by filtering out new, potentially contradicting experiences, thereby perpetuating her biased beliefs.

Introducing Alecto to a book containing both positive and negative information about muggles engages her memory systems in a process known as memory integration. According to this principle, new information—regardless of valence—is initially stored in working memory and then integrated with existing schemas in long-term memory. The positive information about muggle history and behavior might be incorporated into her existing network, creating new connections that could dilute her negative schema. However, because negative information often tends to carry more emotional weight and is more salient, it is likely to dominate her memory landscape unless specific strategies are employed to emphasize positive aspects and create balanced schemas. Without deliberate reinforcement of positive experiences, her beliefs may remain skewed toward negativity, and the negative nodes in her network will continue to exert a stronger influence during recall.

The most effective way to change Alecto’s negative stereotypes, from a cognitive perspective, involves restructuring her knowledge network through elaborative processing and counter-activation of her existing schemas. This could be achieved by providing her with counter-stereotypic information—well-organized, factual, and emotionally salient—about muggles that directly challenge her negative beliefs. For example, presenting her with detailed stories of muggles who display honesty and kindness can evoke schema disconfirmation—the process where dissonant information weakens the strength of her original stereotype nodes. Repeatedly exposing her to such positive examples, coupled with opportunities for schema revision—where she consciously updates her mental network—can ultimately lead to a reorganization of her knowledge structures. This focused and deliberate restructuring is essential for long-term belief change, as it directly targets the cognitive mechanisms that sustain her prejudicial stereotypes.

References

• Tanaka, J. W., & Curby, K. M. (2011). The development of visual expertise. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 20(3), 232-236.
• Anderson, J. R. (2010). Cognitive Psychology and Its Implications. Worth Publishers.
• Rumelhart, D. E. (1980). Schemata: The building blocks of cognition. In R. J. Spiro, B. C. Bruce, & W. F. Brewer (Eds.), Theoretical perspectives on memory (pp. 33-58). Cambridge University Press.
• Gilbert, D. T., & Wilson, T. D. (2007). Prospection: Experiencing the future. Science, 317(5843), 1351–1354.
• Schacter, D. L., & Buckner, R. L. (1998). Priming and the brain. Neuron, 20(2), 185-195.
• Kahneman, D. (2011). Thinking, Fast and Slow. Farrar, Straus and Giroux.
• Bartlett, F. C. (1932). Remembering: A study in experimental and social psychology. Cambridge University Press.
• Eysenck, M. W., & Keane, M. T. (2015). Cognitive Psychology: A Student's Handbook. Psychology Press.
• Schwind, J. K., & Widiger, T. A. (2022). The structure of knowledge and its implications for schema theory. Journal of Cognitive Psychology, 34(4), 347-366.
• Neisser, U. (1967). Cognitive Psychology. Appleton-Century-Crofts.