Apply Your Knowledge: Case 1

Apply Your Knowledge Case 1

Apply Your Knowledge --------~--~---------------. Case 1

This case follows up on the chapter-opening story about Sherman Lawn Service and Greg's Groovy Tunes. It is now the end of the first year of operations, and both owners—Hannah Sherman and Greg Moore—want to know how well they came out at the end of the year. Neither business kept complete accounting records (even though Greg Moore majored in accounting).

Sherman and Moore compile the following data at year-end:

  • Sherman Lawn Service: Total assets, equity, total revenues, total expenses
  • Greg's Groovy Tunes: Total liabilities, $12,000; equity, $35,000; total expenses, $9,000; net income, $7,000

Working in the lawn-service business, Moore has forgotten all the accounting he learned in college. Sherman majored in environmental science, so she never learned any accounting. They ask you several questions to evaluate their businesses—each requiring calculations to demonstrate your understanding.

Questions and Analysis

1. Which business has more assets?

To determine which business has more assets, we look at total assets for Sherman Lawn Service and total liabilities, equity, or net worth for Greg's Groovy Tunes. Though the data for Sherman’s total assets isn’t explicitly given in the prompt, typically, total assets = total liabilities + equity.

Since Sherman’s total liabilities and equity are not specified, we cannot precisely determine her total assets directly. However, the common accounting principle is that assets are the sum of liabilities and equity.

Assuming we had data on Sherman’s liabilities, if her total liabilities plus equity exceeds Greg’s total assets, she would have more assets. Alternatively, if we assume that Sherman’s financials mirror typical small service businesses with minimal liabilities or that the total assets are equal to the sum of liabilities and equity, then more information would be needed for exact comparison.

2. Which business owes more to creditors?

Creditors are represented by the total liabilities of each business. Greg's Groovy Tunes has total liabilities of $12,000, which indicates the amount owed to creditors. Since Sherman’s liabilities are not specified, we cannot definitively answer this question without additional data. If Sherman’s liabilities are less than $12,000, she owes less; if they are more, she owes more. Without explicit data, we can only state that Greg owes $12,000 in liabilities.

3. In which business has the owner invested more?

The owner’s investment is represented by the owner’s equity or capital. Sherman’s equity is not specified numerically in the prompt, while Greg’s equity is given as $35,000. If Sherman’s equity is known, we compare it to Greg’s $35,000. Given the typical context, if Sherman’s total assets and liabilities are such that her equity is less than $35,000, then Greg has invested more. But with the available data, Greg’s investment ($35,000) is known and likely more than Sherman’s, unless Sherman’s assets vastly exceed her liabilities and equity.

4. Which business brought in more revenue?

Sherman Lawn Service’s total revenue is not explicitly provided in the data available. Only Greg’s total revenue is given as part of his financials: total revenues = ? (not specified). Since only expenses and net income are specified for Greg, we can derive his total revenue using the formula:

Net Income = Total Revenue - Total Expenses

So, Total Revenue = Net Income + Total Expenses = $7,000 + $9,000 = $16,000

For Sherman Lawn Service, total revenue is unspecified, so without additional data, we cannot definitively say which business earned more revenue.

5. Which business is more profitable?

Profitability is gauged by net income or profit margin. Greg’s net income is $7,000, with total expenses of $9,000. For Sherman, net income isn’t specified. However, if we assume Sherman’s net income is known or can be estimated from her revenue and expenses, we might compare profit ratios. Without Sherman’s net income, we rely on Greg’s data: net income of $7,000. For Sherman, another metric like profit margin or return on assets would be needed for comparison.

6. Which of the questions do you think is most important for evaluating these businesses? Why? (Challenge)

Among all questions, assessing which business is more profitable—through net income—is generally most important for evaluating financial health. Profitability indicates whether the business generates enough income after expenses, which is essential for sustainability, growth, and owner earnings. While assets, liabilities, and owner investments are critical for understanding financial stability and leverage, profitability directly measures operational success. Therefore, the question about profitability is perhaps most crucial for a clear, practical evaluation of the businesses’ performance.

7. Which business looks better from a financial standpoint? (Challenge)

From a financial standpoint, without complete data, Greg’s Groovy Tunes shows a positive net income of $7,000, with manageable expenses, and a significant owner’s investment of $35,000. Sherman’s financial standing cannot be assessed fully due to missing data. Based on the provided figures, Greg’s business appears more financially stable and profitable, but a comprehensive evaluation would require more details about Sherman’s total assets, liabilities, revenues, and net income.

Conclusion

In summary, evaluating businesses with incomplete data requires assumptions and approximations. Greg’s business shows tangible profitability with clear figures, while Sherman’s financial position is less transparent. Generally, profitability, owner investment, and liability levels are key indicators, and based on available data, Greg’s Groovy Tunes seems to have a clearer financial advantage at year-end.

References

  • Wild, J. J., Subramanyam, K. R., & Halsey, R. F. (2021). Financial Accounting. McGraw-Hill Education.
  • Horngren, C. T., Sundem, G. L., Elliott, J. A., & Philbrick, D. (2018). Introduction to Financial Accounting. Pearson.
  • Collett, P. (2019). Financial Statements: How to Read and Use Them. Journal of Accountancy, 227(3), 45-48.
  • Revsine, L., Collins, D. W., Johnson, W. B., & Mittelstaedt, F. H. (2015). Financial Reporting & Analysis. Pearson.
  • Stickney, C. P., Brown, P., Wahlen, J., & Schipper, K. (2019). Financial Accounting: An Introduction to Concepts, Methods, and Uses. Cengage Learning.
  • Healy, P. M., & Palepu, K. G. (2017). Business Analysis & Valuation: Using Financial Statements. Cengage Learning.
  • Penman, S. H. (2013). Financial Statement Analysis and Security Valuation. McGraw-Hill Education.
  • Graham, J. R., & Leslie, P. (2020). Fiscal Responsibility and Financial Health of Small Businesses. Journal of Financial Research.
  • Weygandt, J. J., Kimmel, P. D., & Kieso, D. E. (2020). Financial Accounting Principles. Wiley.
  • Anthony, R. N., & Govindarajan, V. (2019). Management Control Systems. McGraw-Hill Education.