Applying The Wise Approach Each Week You Will Be Asked To Re
Applying The Wise Approacheach Weekyou Will Be Asked To Respond
Applying the W.I.S.E. Approach Each week, you will be asked to respond to the prompt or prompts in the discussion forum. Your initial post should be 75-150 words in length, and is due on Sunday. By Tuesday, you should respond to two additional posts from your peers. Choose a relevant controversial topic and analyze it based on the W.I.S.E. approach described in Chapter 2 of Becoming a Critical Thinker.
Paper For Above instruction
Controversial topics often evoke strong opinions and polarized views, making critical analysis essential to fostering understanding and civility. One such topic is the use of renewable energy versus fossil fuels. The W.I.S.E. approach—which emphasizes Wise thinking, Inference, Synthesis, and Evaluation—provides a structured method to examine this issue.
Initially, a Wise thinker acknowledges the complexity of the energy debate, recognizing the importance of environmental, economic, and social factors. Inference involves identifying underlying assumptions; for example, proponents of renewable energy often assume that transitioning will be economically feasible and universally accepted. Conversely, opponents may infer that such transitions threaten existing industries and jobs.
Synthesis requires integrating diverse perspectives—considering the environmental benefits of renewable energy, such as reduced greenhouse gases, alongside economic challenges like infrastructure costs. Evaluation involves assessing the validity of claims: Are renewable energy initiatives genuinely sustainable? Do they outweigh the drawbacks of continued fossil fuel dependence?
Applying the W.I.S.E. approach to this controversy reveals the importance of evidence-based reasoning. For instance, studies indicate that renewable energy sources like solar and wind have become increasingly cost-effective (International Renewable Energy Agency, 2020). However, challenges remain regarding storage and grid integration (IRENA, 2021). Evaluating these factors helps individuals develop a nuanced understanding, moving beyond simplistic pro- or anti-fossil fuel arguments.
In conclusion, the W.I.S.E. approach fosters critical thinking by encouraging careful analysis and balanced judgment in controversial debates. It helps individuals navigate complex issues, considering multiple perspectives and evidence to arrive at informed conclusions that promote productive dialogue and sustainable solutions.
References
- International Renewable Energy Agency (IRENA). (2020). Renewable Power Generation Costs in 2020. IRENA.
- International Renewable Energy Agency (IRENA). (2021). Grid Integration of Renewable Energy Sources. IRENA.
- Facer, S., & Tunstall, R. (2020). Critical Thinking for Better Decision Making. Routledge.
- Paul, R., & Elder, L. (2014). Critical Thinking: Tools for Taking Charge of Your Learning and Your Life. Pearson Education.
- Nisbett, R. E. (2015). Mindware: Tools for Smart Thinking. Oxford University Press.
- Kurfiss, J. (1988). Critical Thinking: Theory, Research, Practice, and Possibilities. ASHE-ERIC Higher Education Report No. 2.
- Ennis, R. H. (2011). The Nature of Critical Thinking: An Outline of Some Aims and Standards. SAGE Publications.
- Brookfield, S. D. (2012). Teaching for Critical Thinking: Tools and Techniques to Help Students Question Their Assumptions. Jossey-Bass.
- Paul, R., & Elder, L. (2006). The Miniature Guide to Critical Thinking Concepts and Tools. Foundation for Critical Thinking.
- Schön, D. A. (1983). The Reflective Practitioner: How Professionals Think in Action. Basic Books.