Argumentative Essay In Week Three Assignment You Engaged

Argumentative Essayin The Week Three Assignment You Engaged In A Case

In the Week Three Assignment, you engaged in a case analysis of a current business problem using some of the components of an argumentative essay. In this written assignment, you will write a complete argumentative essay as described in Sections 9.1 and 9.2 of With Good Reason: A Guide to Critical Thinking (Foster, Hardy, & Zàºà±iga y Postigo, 2015). This essay will include a revised and polished version of your Week Three Assignment, an objection to your thesis, a rebuttal, and concluding remarks. Your assignment should include the following: A revision of your Week Three Case Analysis Assignment.

Your revision should represent a substantial edit of your work that fully incorporates feedback from your professor and goes well beyond correcting any grammatical or APA errors. The strongest possible objection to your thesis. After the final paragraph of your Week Three Case Analysis Assignment, start a new paragraph that introduces the strongest possible objection to your thesis. The considerations for this are detailed in Section 9.2 of With Good Reason: A Guide to Critical Thinking (Hardy, Foster, & Zàºà±iga y Postigo, 2015). Make sure to employ the appropriate language to introduce the objection, such as “some may object to my thesis as follows” or “according to [so and so] the thesis presented here fails to account for X” [whatever he or she finds problematic].

You can find other language to do this, of course, but the key point here is to make sure that you indicate that someone else is speaking when presenting this objection. It is also important to remember that you do research to discover good objections and not merely objections that are weak and thus easily rebutted. Look for peer-reviewed journal articles in the Ashford University Library, full-text articles in Google Scholar, or articles in the Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy. Present the opposing position fairly and in detail. This may take more than one paragraph.

A rebuttal. This is a refutation of the objection that you have just presented. Start this in a new paragraph following the objection paragraph(s). Once again, follow the indications of Section 9.2 of With Good Reason: A Guide to Critical Thinking (Hardy, Foster, & Zàºà±iga y Postigo, 2015). You may point out an error in the objection or show that, while it is an important objection, it does not apply squarely to your argument, or does not account for facts that make it irrelevant. Above all, make sure to maintain philosophical decorum in your rebuttal. Toward this end, you should apply the principles of charity and of accuracy, first introduced in the Week One course material. See “Confronting Disagreement” in Section 9.4 of With Good Reason: A Guide to Critical Thinking (Hardy, Foster, & Zàºà±iga y Postigo, 2015).

Closing remarks. End your argumentative essay with a paragraph of closing remarks. Provide some reflections of what you have attempted to achieve by means of your essay. You could, for example, explain how your essay sheds light on the broader controversy that it addresses or points out how your essay addresses a frequently ignored point or an unpopular side in the controversy. You could also reflect on the related matters in the broader controversy that would be useful to examine by others. Do not merely summarize what you have done in the body of your essay, and do not add new information here that would support or contradict your essay since the body of your essay should have addressed all the relevant points. See “Closing Your Essay” in Section 9.2 of With Good Reason: A Guide to Critical Thinking (Hardy, Foster, & Zàºà±iga y Postigo, 2015).

Your assignment should be between 1500 to 1700 words in length, excluding the cover and references pages. Your examination should be both thorough and succinct. This is a combination that demands time and thought, so give yourself sufficient time to draft and revise.

Your assignment should include citations, as well as a list of references. Both must be in APA form. Your references should include at least four peer-reviewed articles in addition to those that you will be carrying over from our Week Three Case Analysis Assignment. These references should be drawn from the Ashford University Library, Google Scholar, or the Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy.

Paper For Above instruction

The development of an effective argumentative essay in the context of a business case analysis involves multiple critical steps, including revision, presentation of objections, rebuttals, and concluding reflections. This process ensures a comprehensive exploration of the issue, showcasing critical thinking and argumentation skills.

First, the essay must be a substantial revision of the initial Week Three Case Analysis. This in-depth revision requires incorporating all feedback provided by the instructor and going beyond grammatical and APA corrections to significantly enhance clarity, coherence, and analytical depth. It involves restructuring arguments, expanding on key points, and ensuring that the analysis is thorough and logically sound.

Next, the essay must explicitly address the strongest objection to the author's thesis. This involves researching reputable sources, such as peer-reviewed journal articles or authoritative philosophical and business literature, to identify a well-founded critique of the thesis. The objection should be articulated clearly, employing language that properly attributes the opposing viewpoint, such as “some may object to my thesis as follows” or “according to [author], the thesis fails to account for...”. This demonstrates an understanding of the controversy from multiple perspectives and enhances the essay's rigor.

Following the objection, a rebuttal must be developed. The rebuttal should effectively counter the objection by pointing out errors, irrelevancies, or limitations within the opposing view. It should also clarify why the original thesis remains valid despite the objection, maintaining academic decorum and principles of charity and accuracy. The rebuttal process demonstrates critical engagement and strengthens the overall argument.

Finally, the essay should conclude with reflective remarks. These should synthesize what was achieved through the essay, explore the broader significance of the issue, and possibly highlight overlooked or contentious points. The conclusion must be analytical and thoughtful, avoiding mere summaries or introductions of new information, and instead providing insights into the importance of the debate.

Word count targets range from 1500 to 1700 words, emphasizing a balanced, well-researched, and carefully drafted analysis. Proper APA citations and references are required, with at least four peer-reviewed sources supporting the argument, sourced from academic repositories and scholarly search engines like Google Scholar and the Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy. These references should be integrated throughout the paper and listed meticulously at the end.

References

• Foster, C., Hardy, J., & Zàºà±iga y Postigo, N. (2015). With Good Reason: A Guide to Critical Thinking. Stanford University Press.
• Additional peer-reviewed articles relevant to the specific case and argumentation topic should be included here in proper APA format.