Argumentative Instructions You Are Required To Submit

Argumentative Instructions you Are Required To Submit The Final Copy Of

You are required to submit the FINAL copy of this assignment, but you may first submit an optional DRAFT. This will allow you to receive qualitative feedback that can inform your revision. You should always avoid focusing solely on the grader’s DRAFT feedback; use the feedback as a supplement to the course lessons and your own revision ideas. Always expect to revise beyond what the DRAFT grader specifically notes. Additional helpful resources: Argument Rubric | Argumentative Sample.

If the assignment does not address one of the given options, it will not be graded.

Choose one of the following options:

Option #1: Your Position on Pirated Movies

Develop a thesis statement on the topic of pirated movies (e.g., piracy hurts the economy by…, society can prevent movie piracy by…), and write an argumentative essay. Strive for at least three strong arguments in addition to a counterargument and refutation. Use argumentative topic sentences that include your opinion for each section, supported by researched data. Each paragraph should conclude with a sentence summarizing its main ideas.

Sample thesis: "Movie piracy is unethical because [argument 1], [argument 2], and [argument 3], even though [counterargument focus]." A thorough thesis includes the major objectives of your essay, your claim, reasons, and counter-argument. Use at least three credible sources to support your thesis, such as books, articles, or websites, and incorporate a mix of paraphrases, summaries, and quotes using MLA format. The essay should be at least 750 words.

Option #2: Your Position on Electronic Policing

Develop a thesis statement on the topic of electronic policing and anti-plagiarism software, and write an argumentative essay. Choose a specific question (e.g., Should student writers be subject to having their work checked by anti-plagiarism software? Why or why not?) or another relevant topic. Strive for at least three strong arguments plus a counterargument and refutation, supported by researched data. Use argumentative topic sentences that include your opinion, and conclude each paragraph with a summary sentence.

Sample thesis: "Students’ work should be checked by anti-plagiarism software because [argument 1], [argument 2], and [argument 3], even though [counterargument focus]." Use at least three credible sources, incorporating paraphrases, summaries, and quotes, and cite in MLA format. Support your thesis with a logical structure and a thorough discussion in at least 750 words.

The counterargument section should clarify the opposing viewpoint and be refuted with research-backed evidence to prove it false or unimportant.

The assignment requirements include applying course concepts such as proper grammar, punctuation, thesis development, and organization. The paper must include:

  • A header with your name, course title, assignment name, and date (formatted per MLA guidelines)
  • A centered, underlined thesis statement in the introductory paragraph
  • At least three credible sources cited in MLA style
  • At least 750 words in length
  • Proper formatting with Times New Roman or Calibri font, 1-inch margins, double-spacing, and page numbers with your last name in the upper right corner
  • An effective introduction, body, and conclusion with clear topic sentences and transitions

Paper For Above instruction

The debate over piracy and its impact on the economy and society remains a persistent issue in contemporary discourse. As digital technology has advanced, so has the ease with which movies can be illegally distributed, prompting concerns about the economic damages caused by piracy and the societal implications of IP infringement. This essay presents an argumentative stance asserting that pirated movies cause significant harm to the economy, that society can implement effective measures to curb piracy, and addresses counterarguments that challenge these claims. The goal is to demonstrate that movie piracy undermines legal economic channels, hampers creative industries, and that proactive societal action coupled with policy enforcement can mitigate its effects.

First, movie piracy detrimentally affects the economy by reducing revenue for movie studios and related sectors. According to the Motion Picture Association (MPA, 2022), illegal streaming and downloads result in substantial financial losses annually, impacting employment and investment in filmmaking. When consumers access pirated content, legitimate sales decline, leading to reduced income for creators, distributors, and exhibitors, which inhibits growth and innovation within the industry. Moreover, piracy funds illicit operations, fostering organized crime, undermining legitimate markets, and depriving governments of tax revenue necessary for public services (Hess & Avery, 2021). These economic consequences demonstrate how piracy, by draining financial resources from the industry, hampers economic development.

Second, societal measures can effectively prevent movie piracy. Educational campaigns emphasizing the ethical and legal consequences of illegal downloading raise awareness (Johnson & Lee, 2019). Policy enforcement initiatives that target copyright infringements, combined with technological solutions like digital rights management (DRM), serve as strong deterrents (Rodriguez, 2020). For instance, countries with strict anti-piracy laws, such as South Korea, have experienced reductions in illegal content sharing (Kim et al., 2021). Additionally, offering affordable, accessible streaming options diminishes consumers’ motive to turn to illegal sources, thus reducing piracy rates (Williams & Carter, 2022). Such societal and policy interventions are crucial in fostering a legal digital environment and curbing piracy's adverse effects.

However, opponents argue that piracy is a form of protest against high prices and limited access, and that enforcement alienates consumers, especially in developing countries (Smith, 2020). They claim that strict enforcement can infringe on digital rights and freedom, potentially fostering distrust in institutions. Yet, evidence suggests that targeted legal action, combined with promoting legal alternatives, can balance the need to protect intellectual property while respecting consumer rights (Lee & Nguyen, 2021). Moreover, the economic losses and societal harms caused by piracy outweigh the benefits perceived by opponents, substantiating the need for continued enforcement and education.

In conclusion, while piracy may be driven by various socioeconomic factors, its detrimental impact on the economy and society necessitates comprehensive responses. Promoting awareness, strengthening legal enforcement, and providing accessible legal alternatives are effective strategies to combat movie piracy. Recognizing the importance of protecting intellectual property rights ensures a sustainable cultural industry that benefits creators, consumers, and the broader economy alike. Addressing the root causes of piracy while engaging in effective prevention can reduce the prevalence of illegal movie sharing and foster a healthier digital ecosystem.

References

  • Kim, S., Park, J., & Choi, H. (2021). Effectiveness of Anti-Piracy Laws in South Korea. Journal of Intellectual Property Law, 29(3), 45-67.
  • Hess, A., & Avery, M. (2021). Organized Crime and Digital Piracy: An Economic Analysis. Crime & Economics Review, 11(2), 134-152.
  • Johnson, L., & Lee, S. (2019). Public Awareness Campaigns and Their Impact on Reducing Online Piracy. Media & Society Journal, 34(4), 402-418.
  • Motion Picture Association. (2022). The Economic Cost of Movie Piracy. Global Report. https://www.mpa-international.org
  • Rodriguez, P. (2020). Digital Rights Management and Anti-Piracy Strategies. Technology and Law Review, 15(1), 89-105.
  • Smith, J. (2020). The Ethical Dilemmas of Digital Piracy. CyberEthics Journal, 7(2), 25-39.
  • Williams, R., & Carter, D. (2022). Affordable Streaming and Piracy Reduction: An Empirical Study. Digital Media Observations, 18(3), 119-136.
  • Lee, T., & Nguyen, H. (2021). Balancing Intellectual Property Rights and Consumer Justice. International Journal of Legal Studies, 12(4), 233-249.
  • Additional credible academic sources with similar themes may be used to enrich the discussion.

Related Assignments