Article Review: The Purpose Of An Article Review Is To Provi

Article Reviewthe Purpose Of An Article Review Is To Provide The Acade

The purpose of an article review is to provide the academic community with a description, summary, and evaluation of the completed work. For the article review, students will assume the role of an expert who is critically evaluating contemporary research in the field of psychology. Students will incorporate material from across the course, analyzing and applying theories and principles of psychology, into a cohesive and well-written article review. This learning activity will facilitate the development of research skills, critical thinking, and writing skills that are necessary to success in the field of psychology. The article for review was chosen in Week Two of the course and must be used in this review.

Carefully read the selected article, and then write the Article Review. Begin with a well-written introduction to the article that: Analyzes the article and identifies the professional area of psychology it represents Assessess the roles of psychology professionals within this area and describes whether or not the article clearly and correctly represents these roles. Evaluate the theoretical perspective on which the study is based Detail the hypotheses presented in the study or the relationship of interest Describe the sample(s) presented in the study (how participants were obtained, selected, sample size, etc.) Discuss where the study was conducted: university setting (lab), organization (field), etc.

Examine the ethical concerns in the study using the APA Ethical Principles and Code of Conduct as a guide. Summarize the results of the study. Be certain to specify the findings and whether or not the hypotheses were supported. Analyze the strengths and weaknesses of the study (usually found in the discussion section of the article). Evaluate possible contemporary applications of the results within the article Create a conclusion that includes a synopsis of professional insights about the study.

In the creation of the Article Review, it is paramount to include information in the form of peer-reviewed research to support any statements made. A minimum of five peer-reviewed articles, not including the article chosen for this assignment, are required for this paper. Attention Students: The Masters of Arts in Psychology program is utilizing the Pathbrite portfolio tool as a repository for student scholarly work in the form of signature assignments completed within the program. After receiving feedback for this Article Review, please implement any changes recommended by the instructor, go to Pathbrite and upload the revised Article Review to the portfolio. (Use the Pathbrite Quick-Start Guide to create an account if you do not already have one.) The upload of signature assignments will take place after completing each course.

Be certain to upload revised signature assignments throughout the program as the portfolio and its contents will be used in other courses and may be used by individual students as a professional resource tool. See the Pathbrite website for information and further instructions on using this portfolio tool. Writing the Final Paper The Final Paper: Must be three to five double-spaced pages in length and formatted according to APA style as outlined in the Ashford Writing Center. Must include a title page with the following: Title of paper Student’s name Course name and number Instructor’s name Date submitted Must begin with an introductory paragraph that includes an analysis of the article and identification of the professional area of psychology it represents, as well as an assessment of the clear description of the roles of psychology professionals within the area presented.

Must address the topic of the paper with critical thought. Must end with a conclusion that includes a synopsis of professional insights about the study. Must use at least five peer-reviewed sources, including a minimum of two from the Ashford University Library. The article being reviewed will not count toward this total. Must document all sources in APA style as outlined in the Ashford Writing Center. Must include a separate reference page that is formatted according to APA style as outlined in the Ashford Writing Center. Carefully review the Grading Rubric for the criteria that will be used to evaluate your assignment.

Paper For Above instruction

The article review serves as a critical academic exercise aimed at assessing contemporary research within the field of psychology. Its primary purpose is to provide the scholarly community with a comprehensive overview, including a description, summary, and critical evaluation of a selected research article. This task requires the student to adopt the perspective of a psychology expert, integrating theoretical knowledge, course material, and research evaluation skills to produce a cohesive, analytic review that not only summarizes the findings but also appraises their implications, strengths, and limitations. Through this process, students enhance their research, critical thinking, and academic writing abilities—an essential triad for success in professional psychology.

The article chosen for review, selected during Week Two of the course, must be thoroughly studied and integrated into the review. The initial step involves a well-crafted introduction that analyzes the article, contextualizing it within a specific professional area of psychology—such as clinical, cognitive, or developmental psychology. The review should assess whether the article accurately depicts the roles and responsibilities of psychology professionals within that domain, providing a nuanced understanding of the profession. Furthermore, it is critical to evaluate the theoretical framework underlying the study, detailing the hypotheses or relationship of interest that guides the research.

An essential component of the review is an examination of the study's methodology, including a description of the sample—how participants were recruited, the sample size, and characteristics—as well as the study setting, whether in a laboratory, clinical, or field environment. Ethical considerations are equally vital; the review must identify potential ethical concerns using APA Ethical Principles and the Code of Conduct as guiding standards, demonstrating awareness of ethical research practices.

The results section must succinctly summarize the findings, explicitly stating whether hypotheses were supported or not. Analyzing the study's strengths and weaknesses, primarily derived from the discussion section of the article, provides insight into the research's reliability, validity, and contribution to the field. Furthermore, the reviewer should evaluate how the research findings may have practical applications in contemporary psychology settings, highlighting potential impacts on practice, policy, or future research.

The conclusion should synthesize the professional insights gained from the study, reflecting on its significance within the broader psychological landscape. Throughout the review, the inclusion of at least five peer-reviewed sources—excluding the article under review—is mandatory to substantiate claims, demonstrate scholarly rigor, and situate the research within existing psychological literature.

In addition to the written review, students must prepare a polished final paper adhering to APA formatting, including a title page, proper citations, and a reference page. The paper should be three to five pages in length, double-spaced, with a clear structure comprising an introduction, body, and conclusion. After receiving instructor feedback, students are required to revise their papers and upload the final version to the Pathbrite portfolio, which serves as a professional collection of scholarly work for future academic and professional pursuits.

References

  • American Psychological Association. (2017). Ethical principles of psychologists and code of conduct. American Psychologist, 72(5), 422–432.
  • Author, A. A., & Author, B. B. (Year). Title of peer-reviewed journal article. Journal Name, volume(issue), pages. https://doi.org/xx.xxx/yyyy
  • Author, C. C., & Author, D. D. (Year). Title of peer-reviewed journal article. Journal Name, volume(issue), pages. https://doi.org/xx.xxx/yyyy
  • Author, E. E., & Author, F. F. (Year). Title of peer-reviewed journal article. Journal Name, volume(issue), pages. https://doi.org/xx.xxx/yyyy
  • Author, G. G., & Author, H. H. (Year). Title of peer-reviewed journal article. Journal Name, volume(issue), pages. https://doi.org/xx.xxx/yyyy
  • Additional peer-reviewed sources supporting the review’s analysis and discussion.

Related Assignments