What Is The APA Format Reference Entry For The Article Wang
What Is The Apa Format Reference Entry For The Articlewang P Che
Awhat Is The APA Format Reference Entry For The Articlewang P Che
A: What is the APA format reference entry for the article? Wang, P., Chen, C., Yang, R., & Wu, Y. (2015). Psychometric evaluation of health related quality of life among rural-to-urban migrants in China. Health and Quality of Life Outcomes, 13, 155. What are the research questions? Are they looking for a difference, an association, or a predictive relationship? The main objective of this study was to evaluate the psychometric properties of the SF-36 scale when used among rural-to-urban migrant populations in Mainland China and whether this version of the SF-36 meets the statistical criteria for reliability and validity across different cultures and populations (Wang et al., 2015). Historically, the concept of health was viewed as a physical condition. However, this concept has expanded over time to encompass mental and social aspects. The SF-36 is a tool utilized to evaluate the general health concepts relevant across age, disease, and treatment groups, with physical health and mental health being the primary dimensions (Wang et al., 2015).
These were included in the SF-36 measurement to evaluate HRQOL, which is a method for determining a person’s satisfaction or happiness with life dimensions that affect or are affected by health (Wang et al., 2015). Describe the research design. Do you feel that this choice was appropriate and why? What are the strengths and weaknesses of the design? Wang et al. (2015) conducted a cross-sectional study in Wuhan, which appears appropriate based on the research objective. They aimed to evaluate the psychometric properties of the SF-36 scale across Mainland China, and a cross-sectional survey allows for data collection at a specific point in time, suitable for validation studies.
The strengths of this design include efficiency in data collection and the ability to assess the scale's properties in a large sample. The weaknesses include inability to infer causality or observe changes over time. For validation purposes, the cross-sectional approach is appropriate, as it provides a snapshot of the instrument's reliability and validity in this population.
Who are the participants and how were they selected? Describe both the target population and the sample. If possible, indicate the response rate achieved by the researchers. According to Wang et al. (2015), participants were rural-to-urban migrants in Wuhan, China. The researchers randomly selected initial fieldwork locations within three districts—Qingshan, Hongshan, and Wuchang—out of seven districts in Wuhan. They used non-probability sampling to identify specific employment locations such as hotels and construction sites with high migrant labor populations. A total of 842 questionnaires were distributed, with 765 responses collected, resulting in a high response rate of approximately 91%.
Are there measurement reliability and validity studies? How would you know the measurements are reliable? What does the study report? Reliability was assessed using split-half and internal consistency methods. A Spearman-Brown coefficient of 0.745 indicates good reliability. The study also reported Cronbach’s alpha (0.770), theta (0.862), and omega (0.903) coefficients that all exceed the acceptable threshold of 0.70, demonstrating high internal consistency (Wang et al., 2015).
How do you know the measurements of the variables are valid? What does the study report? Validity was examined through construct validity assessments, known-group validity, and Confirmatory Factor Analysis (CFA). The CFA showed excellent fit indices: Chi-squared/df = 2.059, GFI = 0.926, RMSEA = 0.037, and CFI = 0.939, supporting the scale’s construct validity. Additionally, the physical and mental component scores aligned with sociodemographic characteristics as expected, further supporting validity (Wang et al., 2015).
What statistical tests were used? Identify each test used. State why that statistic was chosen. The study employed split-half reliability, Cronbach’s alpha, theta, and omega coefficients to assess internal consistency. Confirmatory Factor Analysis was used to evaluate construct validity, with fit indices guiding the interpretation. These tests were chosen because they are standard in validating psychometric instruments; reliability coefficients measure internal consistency, while CFA assesses the scale's factorial structure.
Report the result, the p value, and how it was interpreted. The reliability coefficients exceeded 0.70, indicating acceptable internal consistency, with Cronbach’s alpha at 0.770, theta at 0.862, and omega at 0.903. The CFA results showed strong fit indices: Chi-squared/df = 2.059 (p
Summarize how the results were interpreted. The study validated the SF-36 as a reliable and valid instrument for assessing health-related quality of life among Chinese migrants in Wuhan (Wang et al., 2015). The high reliability coefficients suggest the scale items are consistent internally across diverse subgroups. The CFA confirmed the factorial structure, supporting its construct validity. Despite some lower internal consistency in certain domains, overall, the SF-36 can be confidently used in this population to assess HRQOL, aiding health intervention planning.
Locate any peer-reviewed article that discusses validity and reliability (two types of reliability are Cronbach’s alpha and split-half reliability) in quantitative research. Use the DBA Article Review Guidelines to formulate and post an article review for this article. What is the APA format reference entry for the article? Dönmez, E., Dolu, I., & Yilmaz, Ş. (2022). Validity and reliability of a questionnaire to measure the patient satisfaction with nursing care quality—Turkish version. Asia Pacific Journal of Health Management, 17(2), 1–12.