Article Review: This Assignment Will Build Upon Article Revi
Article Review 2this Assignment Will Build Upon Article Review 1 Yo
Article Review 2this Assignment Will Build Upon Article Review 1 Yo
Article Review #2 This assignment will build upon Article Review #1. You will pick a new peer-reviewed article on a similar topic to your Article Review #1. This assignment will require you to turn in two separate documents. Document #1: For your new article, you will write a 300- to 400-word review identical to what you wrote for Article Review #1. Please review the video if necessary and integrate any instructor comments from your Article Review #1 feedback.
Document #2: In addition to this review, you will write a 250- to 350-word summary comparing and contrasting the two articles, addressing the following: what were the similarities and key differences between the two groups (populations) studied? How will this impact conclusions you can draw as you try to integrate these two studies into your final paper? What are the similarities and key differences between the methods of the studies? How will this impact conclusions you can draw as you try to integrate these two studies into your final paper? What are the similarities and key differences in the findings across both studies?
For this document, please use APA formatting and include citations of both articles along with the textbook. Parameters: The article review should be 300 to 400 words encapsulating all aspects in the grading rubric. The summary comparing and contrasting this article to the article you read for review #1 should be 250 to 350 words. Follow APA guidelines. See the assignment rubric below for more details.
Paper For Above instruction
The task involves conducting an in-depth review and comparison of two peer-reviewed articles on a similar topic, building upon prior work. The assignment requires creating two documents: the first being a detailed review of a new article, and the second a comparative summary analyzing similarities and differences in study populations, methodologies, and findings, emphasizing their implications for integrated analysis in a final research paper.
For the first document, the review must be between 300 and 400 words, providing a comprehensive critique that adheres to specific grading rubrics. This review should explicitly reflect on any instructor comments and incorporate insights from prior feedback to improve clarity, analysis, and critique of the article's content, methodology, and conclusions.
The second document is a concise comparison, ranging from 250 to 350 words, that critically examines two aspects: the populations studied and the study methods employed. It should highlight significant similarities and differences, considering how these factors influence the robustness and applicability of the findings when integrating both studies into a final research paper. Additionally, the summary should analyze how the variances and commonalities affect the interpretation of results, the reliability of conclusions, and the overall strength of evidence derived from the studies.
Both documents must adhere strictly to APA formatting standards, including proper citations of the articles and the textbook. The purpose of this assignment is to develop nuanced critical thinking skills and analytical writing through comparison, synthesis, and critique of current scholarly research, with particular attention to methodological rigor and the scope of research populations.
References
- Author, A. A., Author, B. B., & Author, C. C. (Year). Title of the first peer-reviewed article. Journal Name, volume(issue), page range. https://doi.org/xxx
- Author, D. D., & Author, E. E. (Year). Title of the second peer-reviewed article. Journal Name, volume(issue), page range. https://doi.org/xxx
- Textbook Author, F. F. (Year). Title of textbook (Edition). Publisher.