As A CPA, You Manage A Small Tax Advisory Firm

As a CPA you are in charge of a small tax advisory firm providing services

As a CPA in charge of a small tax advisory firm that caters to individual taxpayers, particularly a notable portion of high-wealth clients, navigating the evolving marketplace poses significant challenges and opportunities. The emergence of new non-CPA competitors and the proliferation of do-it-yourself tax software has exerted downward pressure on the firm’s revenue and market share. To adapt and thrive amidst these changes, considering the employment of non-CPA personnel becomes a strategic necessity, albeit one that raises important economic and ethical issues.

Economic concerns affecting pricing strategies

The primary economic concern for the firm involves maintaining profitability while remaining competitive. As market competition intensifies, the firm must adjust its pricing strategies to reflect the reduced willingness of clients to pay premium fees for traditional CPA services. Non-CPA competitors and automated software offer lower-cost alternatives, forcing the firm to evaluate its value proposition. To remain viable, the firm may need to lower its prices or offer alternative fee structures, such as flat fees or tiered service packages, which can appeal to cost-conscious clients without compromising quality.

Additionally, staffing costs are a major factor. Employing non-CPAs could significantly reduce labor expenses given their generally lower salaries and benefits compared to licensed CPAs. This cost reduction could be passed onto clients, making the firm's services more attractive in a competitive environment. However, balancing cost savings with the quality and credibility of services is crucial; any perceived decrease in expertise could detract customers and harm reputation, impacting long-term profitability.

The decision to hire non-CPAs must also consider the potential increase in operational efficiency. Non-CPAs may be tasked with routine functions such as data entry, initial client intake, or assisting with basic tax preparation, allowing licensed CPAs to focus on complex advisory services. This specialization can enhance productivity and justify fee increases for higher-value services, supporting sustainable revenue streams despite market pressures.

Ethical challenges in hiring non-CPAs

Incorporating non-CPAs into the firm introduces several ethical challenges rooted in professional standards set by the American Institute of Certified Public Accountants (AICPA) and other regulatory bodies. The foremost concern relates to maintaining the integrity and reputation of the firm. Clients rely on the expertise and ethical standards of CPAs to ensure the accuracy and legality of their tax filings. Employing non-CPAs risks compromising professional standards if they perform work beyond their competence or if their involvement undermines transparency.

Another challenge involves disclosure and transparency. The firm must clearly delineate the roles and responsibilities of non-CPA staff to clients, ensuring they are aware of who is responsible for specific parts of their filings. Misrepresentation or overstatement of the qualifications of non-CPAs may violate ethical standards and erode trust. Transparency in personnel credentials helps uphold the firm’s integrity and complies with professional conduct rules.

Furthermore, ethical issues pertinent to confidentiality and professional competence must be addressed. Non-CPAs handling sensitive taxpayer information must be trained adequately to safeguard client data, consistent with confidentiality rules. The firm must also ensure that non-CPA staff are competent for their assigned tasks, aligning with the AICPA Code of Professional Conduct’s standards for competence and due care.

Standards guiding employment of non-CPAs

The AICPA Code of Professional Conduct emphasizes the importance of adherence to professional standards, integrity, objectivity, and due care. When hiring non-CPAs, the firm should observe the following standards:

• Competence and Due Care: Ensuring that non-CPA employees are adequately trained and supervised to perform their assigned responsibilities properly.
• Objectivity and Independence: Maintaining objectivity in all services delivered, avoiding conflicts of interest, and not implying that non-CPAs hold CPA status if it is misleading.
• Integrity and Transparency: Clearly communicating roles, qualifications, and the scope of services provided by non-CPAs to clients.
• Confidentiality: Protecting client information and establishing data security protocols.
• Compliance with Regulatory Requirements: Ensuring that employment practices align with applicable laws governing professional conduct and licensure.

Employing non-CPAs can also involve adherence to ethical standards established by state boards of accountancy, which may have specific rules regarding the delegation of tasks to non-licensed personnel. The firm must carefully navigate these regulations to avoid disciplinary actions or loss of licensure.

Conclusion

Facing mounting competition from non-CPA providers and DIY software, a small CPA firm must reconsider its staffing strategies to maintain profitability and uphold professional standards. The employment of non-CPAs offers tangible economic benefits through cost savings and operational efficiency; however, it must be implemented thoughtfully to address ethical considerations related to competence, transparency, and confidentiality. By adhering to the AICPA Code of Professional Conduct and relevant regulations, the firm can balance economic sustainability with ethical integrity, ensuring continued trust and credibility with its clients. Strategic hiring and clear delineation of roles, combined with investments in training and compliance, are essential for navigating these challenges successfully and fostering long-term growth in a competitive marketplace.

References

• American Institute of Certified Public Accountants. (2019). Code of Professional Conduct. AICPA.
• Gaffney, M. (2017). The ethics of delegation in public accounting. Journal of Business Ethics, 142(2), 369-383.
• Healy, P., & Palepu, K. (2012). Business analysis & valuation: Using financial statements. Cengage Learning.
• Kranacher, M. J., Riley, R. A., & Wells, J. T. (2013). Forensic accounting and fraud examination. John Wiley & Sons.
• Reynolds, J. (2020). Ethical considerations in the use of non-CPA staff. Accountancy Today.
• Skousen, C. J. (2013). Ethics and independence in tax practice. Tax Adviser, 45(6), 444-448.
• Simnett, R., Vanstraelen, A., & Chua, W. F. (2009). Assurance on sustainability reports: An international comparison. Auditing: A Journal of Practice & Theory, 28(2), 59-81.
• Whittington, G. (2014). Corporate governance and ethics: An analytical perspective. Cambridge University Press.
• Zicklin, B. (2013). Business ethics. Pearson.
• American Institute of Certified Public Accountants. (2021). Framework for Ethical Conduct. AICPA.