As A Project Manager, Prepare Two Projects

As A Project Manager You Are Going To Prepare Two Project Outlines Fo

As a project manager, you are going to prepare two project outlines for the development of a mobile application. One project outline uses a waterfall model, another uses an agile method. Prepare two project outlines using Microsoft® Project. Each outline shall consist of a task list and a Gantt chart showing task durations and precedence relationships. Include a 350- to 700-word brief explanation of how the two project outlines differ. Be sure to address how Agile addresses complexity and uncertainty.

Paper For Above instruction

The development of a mobile application is a complex process that benefits from tailored project management methodologies. This paper presents two distinct project outlines for developing a mobile app—one employing the traditional Waterfall model and the other utilizing Agile methodology. These outlines are designed using Microsoft® Project, including task lists, Gantt charts, and task precedence relationships. Additionally, a comprehensive comparison discusses how each approach manages project complexity and uncertainty, with particular emphasis on Agile's advantages in dynamic environments.

Waterfall Project Outline

The Waterfall model adopts a linear, sequential approach to project management, emphasizing upfront planning, detailed documentation, and phase completion before proceeding to subsequent stages. The key phases include requirements analysis, system design, implementation, testing, deployment, and maintenance.

Task List and Precedence Relationships:

1. Requirements Gathering and Analysis

2. System Design

3. Implementation/Coding

4. Testing

5. Deployment

6. Maintenance and Support

Each task flows sequentially, with dependencies clearly delineated, for example, System Design cannot commence until Requirements Gathering concludes, and Implementation starts post-Design approval. Task durations are estimated based on project scope, with Gantt charts illustrating overlapping tasks only where scheduled.

Agile Project Outline

The Agile approach prioritizes flexibility, iterative cycles, and stakeholder collaboration. The project is divided into multiple sprints, typically 2-3 weeks long, each delivering functional components. The initial backlog is created by stakeholders, with tasks such as user story creation, sprint planning, development, testing, review, and retrospective.

Task List and Precedence Relationships:

1. Product Backlog Creation

2. Sprint Planning (each sprint)

3. Development and Testing (per sprint)

4. Sprint Review and Retrospective (per sprint)

5. Integration and Deployment (incremental)

6. Feedback Incorporation and Continuous Improvement

Tasks recur across sprints, with flexible dependencies allowing for adjustment based on ongoing feedback. The Gantt chart shows overlapping sprints, emphasizing ongoing development, testing within sprints, and iterative refinement.

Comparison and Addressing Complexity and Uncertainty

The traditional Waterfall model is well-suited for projects with clear, stable requirements where risk mitigation involves thorough upfront planning. Its linear process minimizes changes, making it predictable but inflexible when faced with evolving user needs or technological uncertainties. Consequently, Waterfall is less effective in complex projects where requirements change frequently or are initially unclear.

In contrast, Agile embraces complexity and uncertainty through iterative cycles and adaptive planning. It allows for continuous stakeholder engagement, making it highly responsive to changing market conditions or emerging technologies. Agile’s incremental delivery provides opportunities for early testing and feedback, reducing risks associated with misunderstandings or unforeseen issues. This approach fosters innovation and accommodates evolving project scopes, making it ideal for mobile app development, where user preferences and technological landscapes evolve rapidly.

Furthermore, Agile manages uncertainty by promoting transparency, frequent communication, and flexibility, enabling teams to pivot quickly when necessary. Its emphasis on working products over comprehensive documentation reduces delays caused by extensive planning. Agile frameworks such as Scrum or Kanban facilitate dynamic task prioritization and scope adjustment, ensuring that the most valuable features are delivered early and modified as needed.

While Waterfall provides predictability, it often struggles with change management, leading to costly revisions if initial requirements are misunderstood or altered. Agile’s iterative nature encourages continuous learning, allowing teams to adapt without significant disruptions. Consequently, for projects embedded within dynamic markets or where requirements are expected to evolve, Agile offers a more suitable and resilient framework.

Conclusion

Both project management strategies serve valuable purposes depending on project complexity and stability. The Waterfall model offers structure and predictability for projects with well-defined requirements, while Agile provides flexibility and responsiveness essential for mobile application development amid evolving user needs and technological advancements. Understanding the strengths and limitations of each approach enables project managers to select the most appropriate methodology, thereby optimizing project outcomes in diverse project environments.

References

  • Boehm, B. (1988). A Spiral Model of Software Development and Enhancement. Computer, 21(5), 61–72.
  • Highsmith, J. (2002). Agile Software Development Ecosystems. Addison-Wesley.
  • Leffingwell, D. (2011). Agile Software Requirements: Lean Requirements Practices for Teams, Programs, and the Enterprise. Addison-Wesley.
  • Serrador, P., & Pinto, J. K. (2015). Does Agile work? — A quantitative analysis of agile project success. International Journal of Project Management, 33(5), 1040–1051.
  • Schwaber, K., & Sutherland, J. (2017). The Scrum Guide. Scrum.org.
  • Royce, W. W. (1970). Managing the Development of Large Software Systems. Proceedings of IEEE WESCON, 26(8), 1–9.
  • Chau, T. (2004). Understanding the unique challenges of agile project management. Journal of Systems and Software, 66(3), 133–152.
  • Conforto, E., Salum, F., Amaral, D. C., da Silva, S. L., & de Almeida, L. F. M. (2016). Can Agile Project Management Be Adopted by Industries Other Than Software Development? Project Management Journal, 47(3), 21–34.
  • PMI. (2017). A Guide to the Project Management Body of Knowledge (PMBOK® Guide) (6th ed.). Project Management Institute.
  • Fitzgerald, B., & Stol, K. (2017). Continuous Software Engineering: A Roadmap and Agenda. Journal of Systems and Software, 123, 176–189.

Related Assignments