Plagiarism And Logic Self Check: Prepare As You Write

Question

Plagiarism And Logic Self Checkprepareas You Prepare To Write Your Fir Plagiarism and Logic Self-Check Prepare as you prepare to write your first discussion for this week. Review Chapter 4, Section 4.3 in the textbook, the AWC’s Guidelines for Paraphrasing Sources and Integrating Quotes, and the AWC’s Recognizing and Avoiding Plagiarism. Familiarize yourself with the Turnitin Student FAQ and watch the video "Using Turnitin Through Waypoint." Revisit the grading rubric for this discussion. Reflect personally on what you have learned about argument, logic, and fallacies during the past month. Reread your draft with a focus on identifying logical fallacies and unsupported claims. Evaluate your use of outside sources, paying attention to quotation marks, paraphrasing accuracy, and proper in-text citations. Take note of any errors or concerns that arise during this review. Use the Turnitin tool to assist in your review process. Write 200 to 300 words about your experience with the plagiarism and logic self-check. Describe the steps you took during your review, the issues you uncovered, and how you plan to address them. Include questions you might have or advice you seek. Share some of your strongest quotes, paraphrases, and logical arguments, explaining why these sections stand out as your best work. Reflect on how this process will influence your future writing practices, emphasizing the importance of maintaining academic integrity and logical coherence in your work.

Dr. Jack HW Helper · Accepted Answer

The process of conducting a plagiarism and logic self-check is an essential step for enhancing academic integrity and developing rigorous argumentative skills. My approach began with a thorough review of relevant materials, including Chapter 4, Section 4.3 of the textbook, the AWC’s guidelines on paraphrasing, and recognizing plagiarism. Additionally, I examined the Turnitin Student FAQ and watched the instructional video "Using Turnitin Through Waypoint" to familiarize myself with the digital tools available for plagiarism detection and feedback. During my review, I scrutinized my initial draft for common issues such as unintentional plagiarism, poorly paraphrased material, and inadequate citations. I looked for missing quotation marks, paraphrases that did not accurately reflect the original source, and in-text citations that were incomplete or incorrectly formatted. This process heightened my awareness of how easy it is to inadvertently commit plagiarism or fall into logical fallacies, especially when handling complex arguments or multiple sources. One significant find was a paraphrased section that lacked proper attribution, risking unintentional plagiarism. I corrected this by inserting appropriate citations and improving the paraphrase to better reflect the original meaning. Additionally, I identified a claim that was unsupported by sufficient evidence, which I plan to strengthen with credible sources in the revision stage. Using Turnitin's similarity report, I viewed the similarity index, which prompted me to further refine my citations and ensure original writing. This experience underscored the importance of meticulous source management and logical coherence in academic writing. I discovered some of my strongest passages to be seamless quotes and well-supported logical arguments, such as the discussion on the fallacy of false dichotomy. These sections stood out because they exemplified clarity, supporting evidence, and proper attribution. Going forward, I w

Plagiarism And Logic Self Check: Prepare As You Write

Plagiarism And Logic Self Checkprepareas You Prepare To Write Your Fir

Paper For Above instruction

References

Plagiarism And Logic Self Checkprepareas You Prepare To Write Your Fir

Paper For Above instruction

References

Related Assignments