Ashley Allen Southern New Hampshire University Research Summ

Ashley Allensouthern New Hampshire Universityresearch Summarythe Nfl

Ashley Allen Southern New Hampshire University Research Summary The NFL now interviews potential new coordinators from a wider pool of candidates thanks to the Rooney Regulation. Carroll, C. (2018, December 31). What is the Rooney Rule? Retrieved July 14, 2019, from This citation is significant because it explains the Rooney Regulation, the moment it was established, and whether its implementation led toward additional businesses adopting the similar approach. The number of minority coordinators that were employed, individuals that had also gone terminated, and those who remain are all mentioned in this citation, which supports my claim by explaining the improvements to the kind of persons the NFL investigates and employs.

In addition, the proportion of minority instructors in the NFL is still quite modest compared to all instructors. Reid, J. (2018, January 11). It's time for the NFL to take the Rooney Rule seriously or get rid of it. Retrieved July 14, 2019, from, this citation is significant because it discusses how, despite certain minority instructors being hired in the NFL because of the Rooney Policy, the situation is still far from ideal. The section explains how League proprietors continue to deny minority management applicants equitable opportunities to negotiate for positions as offensive coordinators or top executives.

This study source was downloaded by from CourseHero.com on :44:31 GMT -05:00 This section will be crucial when I discuss the changes that continue to be implemented to the regulation and the importance of increased oversight to make absolutely sure that groups are actually following it. Duffley v. New Hampshire Interscholastic Athletic Association, 122 N.H. 484, 446 A.2d ). This instance, which we were discussing during my online class at the start of the term, is comparable to my thesis issue in that it involves a property that was not even specifically granted to a particular individual.

The claimant in Duffley v. New Hampshire Interscholastic Athletic Organization was rejected the opportunity to play sports for a second season. The Rooney Regulation and the fact that minority instructors in the NFL have been unable to be vetted for directing openings, let alone having been employed by an NFL team, led the judge to regard this as illegal. Minority applicants just weren't afforded the equal privileges to interviews as other non-minority applicants. This will become crucial when I get to the section of my thesis where I discuss a situation I can use to link my thesis to.

This study source was downloaded by from CourseHero.com on :44:31 GMT -05:00 Powered by TCPDF ( 4 Self-Justification Author’s Name Institutional Affiliation Course Name and Number Instructor Due Date Self-Justification Self-Justification and Science Self-justification negatively affects science by preventing its growth in preference for sticking with long-standing personal beliefs or general public consensus. In Chapter 4 of their book, Tavris and Aronson (2008) discuss how seasoned therapists refused to acknowledge points of view that were different from their own for fear of being wrong and having to admit the drastic consequences of their professional actions. Tavris and Aronson (2008) note that scientific disciplines are self-correcting and self-improving.

This means that aspects that may be deemed accurate today may be deemed inaccurate tomorrow through scientific research. However, professionals tend to show resistance toward such a shift if the change will render their previous work to be invalid. I can apply these ideas to how I will conduct science in my dissertation. Specifically, I can consider different perspectives from my own without bias to ensure that the path I take is the right one. This means that I have to be open-minded to the possibility of new truths based on new data and scientific research.

Overall, these ideas of self-justification generalize when the consequences of accepting the actual truth are severe. For instance, a therapist whose professional opinion sends a person to prison wrongly is likely to self-justify in order to recuse him/herself from responsibility. Self-Justification and the Law Self-justification affects the law by preventing the practice of true justice. In Chapter 5 of their book, Tavris and Aronson (2008) discuss several examples of wrongful convictions made throughout the years. In these examples, even after new evidence emerged that exonerated the wrongfully accused individuals, the prosecutors and investigating police officers were still adamant that the persons of interest were guilty.

Tavris and Aronson (2008) reveal that this self-justification is often done to protect jobs, reputations, or colleagues. In extreme circumstances, innocent people are kept in prison under the premise that they might have carried out some other unknown crime. This self-justification prevents the justice system from being effective. These ideas can be generalized to other areas. Often, people in different disciplines often do not want to admit their mistakes when new evidence that disputes their professional actions arises.

For example, a therapist whose statement condemns a person for rape may try to shift blame to other parties if new evidence becomes known to exonerate the individual. This is especially true if the consequences of his/her actions are extreme, for instance, if the wrongfully accused person serves a long prison sentence before the charges are dropped. Self-Justification and Relationships Self-justification may either affect relationships positively or negatively. When one gets into a relationship, the union forces him/her to not only learn more about his/her partner but also about him/herself. What one learns may not necessarily be pleasing.

However, since the individual is already invested in the relationship, he/she will attempt to justify the reasons why the union is important and outline reasons why he/she is happy. This information can either help people to make better or worse relationships. Tavris and Aronson (2008) assert that self-justification can either push a couple toward the direction of hostility and greater dissonance or toward the direction of affection and greater closeness. The ones whose relationships work are the ones who acknowledge their differences and perspectives with the objective of bridging the gap by understanding their partners. However, other relationships fail because the partners focus on the other parties’ shortcomings while justifying their own behaviors regardless of whether they are right or wrong.

References

  • Carroll, C. (2018). What is the Rooney Rule? Retrieved from https://www.example.com/rooney-rule
  • Reid, J. (2018). It's time for the NFL to take the Rooney Rule seriously or get rid of it. Retrieved from https://www.example.com/rooney-rule-seriously
  • Duffley v. New Hampshire Interscholastic Athletic Association, 122 N.H. 484, 446 A.2d (year).
  • Tavris, C., & Aronson, E. (2008). Mistakes were made (but not by me): Why we justify foolish beliefs, bad decisions, and hurtful acts. Houghton Mifflin Harcourt.
  • Additional credible sources providing context on NFL diversity policies and legal cases in sports law.

Related Assignments