Assessment Description Planning For Instruction Begins With ✓ Solved

Assessment Descriptionplanning For Instruction Begins With Identifying

Assessment Description Planning for instruction begins with identifying appropriate state content standards to be taught. Analyzing these standards provides the basis for instructional planning. Select a grade level (K-8 elementary or K-12 special education) and a content area of your choice. Choose one standard from the content area. This standard will be the focus of your assignments throughout this course.

Using the “Unwrapping a Standard” template, analyze the standard and possible instructional strategies to teach the standard. Your analysis should focus on: the verbs used within the standard and their correlation to levels of Bloom’s taxonomy; how students will demonstrate evidence of mastery of each part of the standard; and appropriate strategies or methods of instruction for teaching the standard to meet the diverse needs of all students.

Based on your analysis, write at least two developmentally appropriate learning objectives for the standard. Please refer to the “Writing Competency-Based Learning Objectives” resource to support your objectives. Support your analysis with three scholarly resources.

Sample Paper For Above instruction

Assessment Descriptionplanning For Instruction Begins With Identifying

Sample Analysis of a Content Standard for Effective Instruction

Introduction

Effective instructional planning hinges on a thorough understanding of the relevant content standards. For this paper, I selected a grade 3 science standard focused on "Understanding the Water Cycle." This standard states that students should be able to "describe the process of the water cycle including evaporation, condensation, precipitation, and collection." The analysis below utilizes the "Unwrapping a Standard" template to dissect this standard and inform instructional strategies that cater to diverse learners, ultimately leading to the development of clear learning objectives.

Unwrapping the Standard

Standard Description

The standard emphasizes understanding the water cycle, which involves multiple processes: evaporation, condensation, precipitation, and collection. The verbs in the standard are "describe," which requires students to verbally or in written form articulate the processes involved.

Analysis of Verbs and Bloom's Taxonomy

The verb "describe" is situated at the lower to mid-levels of Bloom's taxonomy, falling under "Comprehension" and "Application." To effectively meet this standard, instructional activities should progress from recognizing and defining each process to applying knowledge in real-world contexts.

Evidence of Mastery

Students demonstrate mastery by accurately verbalizing or illustrating each stage of the water cycle, sequencing the processes correctly, and explaining the significance of each step in the cycle.

Instructional Strategies

To accommodate varied learning styles, multiple strategies are recommended. Visual aids such as diagrams and videos can support visual learners; hands-on experiments, like creating a mini water cycle in a bag, can reinforce experiential learners; and discussions or role-play can cater to kinesthetic and auditory learners. Differentiation is essential, with modifications for learners requiring additional support or challenges.

Developing Learning Objectives

Based on the standard analysis, two developmentally appropriate learning objectives are:

  1. By the end of the lesson, students will be able to describe the main processes of the water cycle using correct scientific terminology.
  2. Students will construct a simple diagram illustrating the stages of the water cycle and explain the function of each stage in the process.

Conclusion

Unpacking standards through systematic analysis informs targeted instruction that is accessible, engaging, and aligned with student developmental levels. Critical consideration of verb semantics, mastery evidence, and instructional strategies ensures comprehensive coverage of the standard and promotes effective learning experiences.

References

  • Anderson, L. W., & Krathwohl, D. R. (2001). A taxonomy for learning, teaching, and assessing: A revision of Bloom's taxonomy of educational objectives. Longman.
  • Marzano, R. J. (2007). The art and science of teaching: A comprehensive framework for effective instruction. ASCD.
  • Wiggins, G., & McTighe, J. (2005). Understanding by design. ASCD.
  • McTighe, J., & Wiggins, G. (2012). Essential questions: Opening doors to student understanding. ASCD.
  • Hattie, J. (2009). Visible learning: A synthesis of over 800 meta-analyses relating to achievement. Routledge.