Assessment Descriptions All Case Studies Are To Be Submitted

Assessment Descriptionsall Case Studies Are To Be Submitted Through T

All case studies are to be submitted through Turnitin to check for plagiarism. The familiarity score should be 25% or less. Students may submit assignments up to 3 times through Turnitin as long as it is prior to the due date. The final submission on the due date will be graded. Submissions that exceed 25% will receive a 20 point penalty.

Submissions will be graded only once. No rework will be accepted. The purpose of the discussions is to glean ideas and spark conversations between and among students. The discussions should reflect students’ knowledge regarding the discussion questions and comments and synthesize the concepts within the text, outside sources, and application to real-world situations. Discussions may be opinion-based but should be backed up by facts and/or rationale.

See the course outline for due dates. The student is to choose a business organization to visit and prepare an original case study analysis. The assignment should reflect the student’s ability to recognize and define business strategy and practices from strategic management concepts and apply them to real-life situations. The student is expected to prepare the case study by following the Case Study Guidelines, Case Study Rubric, and the 6th edition of the APA Manual.

The student is to prepare a 7-10 slide PowerPoint summarizing the previously submitted Business Analysis Project. This PowerPoint should be professional, including transitions and animations, and follow the PowerPoint rubric.

The team case study consists of a written paper and a PowerPoint presentation, each including at least two peer-reviewed articles per student. Team members will collaborate to research, analyze, and synthesize the information, following the Case Study Guidelines. Evaluation will be based on the submitted work according to the Case Study Guidelines, Rubric, and APA standards. See the course outline for due dates.

Each student will perform self- and peer-assessments regarding participation and preparation of the team case study at the end of the term.

All assignments must adhere to the following submission standards:

  • Use of Case Study Guidelines, Rubric, and APA Manual (6th edition)
  • Timely submission
  • Typewritten, professional style, size 12 font, double-spaced, with a professional appearance
  • Include a title page: course number and name, student name, date of term
  • Proper citation of research and statements
  • Opinions only in the recommendations section
  • Use correct grammar, punctuation, and sentence structure
  • Maintain a professional tone
  • Include an abstract
  • Incorporate a visual aid (graph, chart, diagram, figure, or table)

Paper For Above instruction

The given instructions primarily focus on the submission protocols, required content, and formatting standards for various academic assignments related to business analysis and strategic management. These include individual and team case studies, PowerPoint presentations, discussions, peer reviews, and comprehensive project reports. The core objective is to ensure students adhere to academic honesty, demonstrate critical understanding, and effectively communicate their analytical insights within a professional and scholarly framework.

Specifically, students are expected to select a business organization for detailed study, analyzing its strategic practices against theoretical models. The research must integrate peer-reviewed sources and adhere to APA formatting, emphasizing clarity, originality, and critical evaluation. The PowerPoint presentations should be professional, succinct, and visually engaging, summarizing key findings from the written analysis. Collaborative efforts in team projects should demonstrate cohesive research and synthesis skills, with peer assessments reflecting individual contributions.

Strict guidelines are outlined for submission timing, formatting, citation, and presentation quality, emphasizing professionalism in all work. Assignments are to be submitted on time, with late submissions not accepted beyond the specified deadline. The use of visual aids and proper citations enhances the academic integrity and comprehensiveness of the students' work. Overall, these instructions serve to uphold academic standards while facilitating effective learning and professional development in strategic management.

References

  • Barney, J. B., & Hesterly, W. S. (2019). Strategic management and competitive advantage: Concepts and cases (6th ed.). Pearson Education.
  • Eisenhardt, K. M., & Sull, D. N. (2001). Strategy’s new logic: Jumping over the hurdles. Harvard Business Review, 79(2), 106-114.
  • Grant, R. M. (2019). Contemporary strategy analysis (10th ed.). Wiley.
  • Kaplan, R. S., & Norton, D. P. (2004). Strategy maps: Converting intangible assets into tangible outcomes. Harvard Business School Publishing.
  • Porter, M. E. (1985). Competitive advantage: Creating and sustaining superior performance. Free Press.
  • Thompson, A. A., Peteraf, M., Gamble, J. E., & Strickland, A. J. (2018). Crafting and executing strategy: The quest for competitive advantage (21st ed.). McGraw-Hill Education.
  • Wheelwright, S. C., & Clark, K. B. (1992). Revolutionizing product Development: Quantum leaps in speed, efficiency, and quality. Free Press.
  • Yukl, G. (2013). Leadership in organizations (8th ed.). Pearson.
  • Ghemawat, P. (2007). Redefining global strategy: Crossing borders in a bircuitous world. Harvard Business School Publishing.
  • Hambrick, D. C., & Fredrickson, J. W. (2001). Are you sure you have a strategy? Academy of Management Executive, 15(4), 48-59.

Related Assignments