Assignment 1 Revised Problem Statement At The End Of Your Pr

Assignment 1 Revised Problem Statementat The End Of Your Previous Cou

Assignment 1: Revised Problem Statement at the end of your previous course, DDBA 8161, you submitted a draft Problem Statement. It is critical that your problem statement is business focused, presenting a challenge or issue from the perspective of business managers or industry leaders who can address the problem. It must adopt a management perspective and avoid social, psychological, educational, or other discipline-specific emphases.

The Walden University model for writing the DBA Problem Statement includes four elements: the (a) hook, (b) anchor, (c) general business problem, and (d) specific business problem. While the hook, anchor, and general business problem can be similar for both quantitative and qualitative studies, the specific business problem must be distinctly aligned with the chosen research method.

This assignment builds on your Week 8 draft Problem Statement from DDBA 8161, focusing on understanding how research method choice influences the alignment with the specific business problem. You should review your previous draft, incorporate peer feedback received during discussions, and prepare two revised Problem Statements: one for a quantitative study and one for a qualitative study.

Additionally, you will write a one-page rationale explaining the changes made to both Problem Statements, supported by references from the Doctoral Study Rubric and Research Handbook, emphasizing the importance of methodological alignment.

Prepare and submit by Day 7:

- A revised quantitative Problem Statement based on your original draft and peer feedback.

- A revised qualitative Problem Statement based on your original draft and peer feedback.

- A one-page description and rationale outlining the modifications and reasoning behind each, with appropriate scholarly references.

Paper For Above instruction

The development of a precise and well-aligned Problem Statement is essential for the success of a doctoral study, especially in a business context. In the context of the Walden University DBA program, the Problem Statement must clearly articulate a challenge or issue from the eyes of business leaders or managers, ensuring it is enterprise- or management-centric. The focus must be on a business problem that can be addressed through research, without delving into social, psychological, or educational complexities that fall outside managerial scope.

According to the Walden University model, the Problem Statement consists of four critical elements: the hook, which captures attention; the anchor, which contextualizes the problem; the general business problem, outlining a broad issue affecting the organization or industry; and the specific business problem, which pinpoints the precise challenge that the research will address. While the first three elements may remain similar across different research methodologies, the specific business problem must be distinctly tailored to align with either a quantitative or qualitative approach.

For quantitative research, the specific business problem should encapsulate variables that can be measured, analyzed statistically, and tested for relationships or differences. Examples include declining sales percentages, customer satisfaction scores, or productivity measures. Conversely, a qualitative approach requires a focus on understanding phenomena in depth, emphasizing perceptions, experiences, or processes, hence the specific problem should aim to explore underlying reasons, meanings, or contextual nuances.

Building upon the Week 8 draft problem statement from DDBA 8161, this assignment necessitates revising the original problem to better align with the research method. This includes refining the language to specify whether the problem is suited to quantifiable analysis or rich qualitative exploration. Peer feedback should be incorporated into these revisions to enhance clarity and focus. Additionally, a rationale paragraph must articulate the decisions behind the modifications, referencing scholarly guidance such as the Doctoral Study Rubric and Research Handbook, to demonstrate methodological coherence and scholarly rigor.

Ultimately, the goal is to craft two coherent, focused, and aligned problem statements—one for a quantitative study and one for a qualitative study—that are ready to underpin a compelling doctoral proposal. The rationale should explain how these revisions improve the clarity, focus, and alignment of each problem statement with its respective research method, emphasizing the importance of methodological consistency in doctoral research.

References

• Walden University. (2020). Doctoral Study Rubric and Research Handbook. Walden University.
• Creswell, J. W. (2014). Research Design: Qualitative, Quantitative, and Mixed Methods Approaches. Sage Publications.
• Salkind, N. J. (2017). Exploring Research. Pearson Education.
• Yin, R. K. (2018). Case Study Research and Applications: Design and Methods. Sage Publications.
• Bryman, A. (2016). Social Research Methods. Oxford University Press.
• Leedy, P. D., & Ormrod, J. E. (2018). Practical Research: Planning and Design. Pearson.
• Patton, M. Q. (2015). Qualitative Research & Evaluation Methods. Sage Publications.
• Creswell, J. W., & Plano Clark, V. L. (2017). Designing and Conducting Mixed Methods Research. Sage Publications.
• Glaser, B., & Strauss, A. (2017). The Discovery of Grounded Theory. Routledge.
• Silverman, D. (2016). Qualitative Research. Sage Publications.