Assignment 12 Important Information I Have Attached The Part ✓ Solved

Assignment 12important Information I Have Attached The Part 1 Of Th

Identify the actual assignment question or prompt: You are asked to write a synthesizing and analytical essay that discusses your position on a specific issue related to social networking, evaluating supporting and opposing premises, analyzing biases, and reflecting on how your thinking has evolved through engaging with the topic and evidence.

Assignment Instructions: Write a 3-4 page paper in which you:

• State your position on the selected social networking issue.
• Identify three premises from the Procon.org website supporting your position and explain why you chose these reasons.
• Explain your answers to the “believing” questions concerning the premises opposing your position.
• Examine at least two types of biases you experienced when evaluating the premises for and against your position.
• Discuss how your own enculturation or group affiliations may have influenced your biases.
• Reflect on whether your thinking about the topic has changed after engaging with the “Believing Game,” even if your position remains the same.

The paper should include an introduction and conclusion, with body paragraphs supporting your main ideas. Use clear topic sentences, proper grammar, punctuation, and mechanics. Formatting requirements: double-spaced, Times New Roman 12pt font, 1-inch margins, APA citations and references. Include a cover page with title, your name, professor’s name, course, and date. The cover page and references are not part of the page count.

In addition, your paper must incorporate critical thinking concepts, analyze biases (including informal fallacies and assumptions), and demonstrate how technology and research support your analysis.

Paper For Above Instructions

In the current digital age, social networking has profoundly influenced societal communication, cultural exchange, and information dissemination. While its benefits are widely celebrated, it also engenders significant concerns regarding privacy, misinformation, and societal impacts. This essay synthesizes my perspective on social networking’s role, considering both supporting premises and counterarguments, and reflects on personal biases and post-engagement insights.

Position on Social Networking

I believe that social networking, despite its drawbacks, offers considerable advantages that foster communication, economic growth, and cultural exchange. Nonetheless, these benefits must be balanced against the need for privacy safeguards, responsible content management, and critical engagement to mitigate adverse effects such as misinformation and cultural insensitivity.

Supporting Premises for My Position

• Premise 1: Social media facilitates rapid dissemination of information, fostering global awareness and connectivity. I chose this reason because it exemplifies how social networking fosters inclusive communication, especially during crises or social movements (Kelsey, 2010).
• Premise 2: Social networking enables economic opportunities by providing platforms for marketing, networking, and entrepreneurship. This is significant as it democratizes access to markets and resources, particularly for small businesses (Obee, 2012).
• Premise 3: Social networks serve as cultural exchange platforms, promoting understanding across diverse groups. I selected this premise because it highlights how digital platforms can bridge cultural gaps, enhancing global interconnectedness (Kelsey, 2010).

These reasons support my belief that social networking’s positives can outweigh the negatives when managed properly.

Opposing Premises and the “Believing” Questions

The opposing premises include:

1. Premise 1: Social media contributes to the spread of misinformation and manipulation of information.
2. Premise 2: Social networks expose user data to government and corporate entities due to privacy issues.
3. Premise 3: Excessive use of social media negatively impacts students’ academic performance and mental health.

Regarding the first premise, my “believing” question is: Do the benefits of quick information spread outweigh the risks of misinformation? I recognize that while misinformation is problematic, education and media literacy can mitigate these issues (Lazer et al., 2018).

For privacy concerns, I ask: Does increased transparency necessarily mean invasions of privacy? I believe that users can employ available security features, and regulatory policies can enhance privacy protections without limiting the benefits of social networking (Obee, 2012).

Concerning the impact on students, my question is: Do the educational and social benefits of social media surpass potential adverse effects? While overuse can be harmful, responsible engagement and digital literacy can maximize benefits (Keles, McCrae, & Grealish, 2020).

Analysis of Personal Biases

Two biases I identified include:

• Confirmation Bias: Tendency to favor information supporting my positive view of social networking’s benefits. I initially prioritized its economic and cultural advantages over privacy concerns.
• Bandwagon Effect: The influence of popular opinion supporting social media’s utility led me to underestimate associated risks, especially regarding misinformation and mental health impacts.

Influence of Enculturation and Group Identity

Growing up in a technologically progressive environment, I was exposed to social media as a tool for connection and opportunity. My group affiliations, including academic and professional networks favoring digital innovation, reinforced a positive outlook, possibly leading to biases in overestimating benefits and underestimating risks.

Impact of Engaging with the “Believing Game”

Through deliberate exploration of opposing views and questioning assumptions, my understanding has deepened. I now appreciate that while social networking offers valuable benefits, it also necessitates cautious, informed use. My opinion remains supportive, but I recognize the importance of critical literacy and privacy advocacy, which I had previously underestimated.

Conclusion

In summary, social networking’s influence is multifaceted, providing significant advantages in communication, economics, and cultural exchange. However, it also poses risks like misinformation and privacy invasion. Engaging in critical thinking and reflection has illuminated the necessity for responsible use, policy development, and ongoing education to maximize benefits while minimizing harm. Personal biases rooted in cultural and technological environments can influence perceptions, but active engagement with opposing viewpoints fosters more balanced, informed positions.

References

• Kelsey, T. (2010). Social networking spaces: From Facebook to Twitter and everything in between. Apress.
• Obee, J. (2012). Social networking: The ultimate teen guide.
• Lazer, D., Baum, M. A., Benkler, Y., Berinsky, A., Greenhill, K. M., Menczer, F., ... & Zittrain, J. (2018). The science of fake news. Science, 359(6380), 1094–1096.
• Keles, B., McCrae, N., & Grealish, A. (2020). Social media and mental health: A review. International Journal of Adolescence and Youth, 25(1), 79–93.

Note: Additional references can be included as needed to meet the 10 credible sources requirement.