You Have Kicked Off The District 4 Production Warehouse Move ✓ Solved

You Have Kicked Off The District 4 Production Warehouse Move Project

You have kicked off the District 4 Production Warehouse Move project, your contractors are in place and working on receiving the proper building permits. You originally were told the permits would only take 2 weeks to obtain but the contractors are telling you it will now take 3 weeks. You need to build the additional week into your schedule for each permit that will be obtained. In addition, your framing and drywall contractors have just told you they are running late on their other jobs and can only release half their crew for your project. This will double their schedule.

Build the extra time into your schedule by doubling the installation work timelines for both the framing and drywall. Your project plan should also be updated with the new 3-week timeline for obtaining permits. Use the project plan you created for this task. You are now looking at an extended project delivery date. Your project sponsor was very clear that you must be done in a 4 month timeframe so you will need to look at options for reducing your schedule to fit into the 4 month window.

You have an option of hiring another contractor to help with the framing and drywall work but it will increase your budget by $200,000. Determine your best course of action for bringing this project in on schedule and update your project plan to reflect your recommendation. Develop a 5-6 slide presentation for senior management outlining your proposed solution. You are seeking approval to proceed with your new plan. Submit both your updated project plan in PDF format and your PowerPoint presentation.

Sample Paper For Above instruction

Project Schedule Adjustment and Resource Planning for Warehouse Move

Introduction

The successful completion of a complex warehouse relocation project involves detailed scheduling, resource management, and contingency planning. In this scenario, unexpected delays in permits and contractor availability necessitate a strategic review of the project timeline. This paper presents an analysis of the situation, proposes adjusted schedules, evaluates options to meet the four-month deadline, and recommends the best course of action for the senior management to approve.

Project Background and Initial Timeline

The District 4 Production Warehouse Move was initially scheduled with a two-week permit acquisition period. Contractors were prepared to start construction immediately afterward, with planned installation phases for framing and drywall. The initial plan was designed to fit within a four-month window, aligning with organizational goals for timely project completion.

Challenges Encountered

Permit Delays

Originally projected at two weeks, permit processing has now extended to three weeks. This additional week must be incorporated into the project schedule, pushing the start of construction activities further away.

Resource Limitations

The framing and drywall contractors reported delays due to other commitments. They can only allocate half their crews, which will double the duration of their work phases. This, combined with permit delays, threatens the ability to complete the project within the four-month deadline.

Revised Scheduling and Impact

Permit Processing

The permit timeline has been extended from two to three weeks, adding an extra week before construction can commence.

Construction Activities

Doubling the timelines for framing and drywall installation to account for reduced crews results in significant schedule extensions. For example, if originally planned to take four weeks, this now extends to eight weeks.

Options for Schedule Compression

Hiring Additional Contractors

An alternative is to hire additional contractors at an increased cost of $200,000. This investment aims to accelerate the framing and drywall phases to meet the four-month deadline.

Cost-Benefit Analysis

Investing in additional contractor resources reduces the construction duration, helping to align the project completion with organizational goals. However, it involves higher expenditure and potential coordination challenges.

Proposed Solution

The recommended approach is to proceed with hiring additional contractors to expedite framing and drywall work. The additional budget will facilitate deploying full crews, reducing activity duration back to the original timeline or close, despite the initial delays.

This plan ensures the project remains within the four-month deadline while managing costs effectively. It also mitigates risks associated with further schedule slippage due to ongoing resource constraints.

Project Plan Updates

• Incorporate a three-week period for permit acquisition.
• Adjust the framing and drywall timelines to reflect the additional resources and reduce extended durations.
• Allocate budget for the $200,000 additional contractor expenditure.
• Set new milestones aligned with the revised schedule.

Conclusion

Effective schedule management and strategic resource allocation are crucial to successfully completing the warehouse move within the organizational deadline. The recommended plan balances cost with schedule adherence and provides a clear path forward. Approving this plan enables the project team to implement necessary adjustments promptly and ensures project success.

References

• Kerzner, H. (2017). Project Management: A Systems Approach to Planning, Scheduling, and Controlling. Wiley.
• PMI. (2021). A Guide to the Project Management Body of Knowledge (PMBOK® Guide). Project Management Institute.
• Meredith, J.R., & Mantel, S.J. (2017). Project Management: A Managerial Approach. Wiley.
• Leach, L. P. (2014). Critical Chain Project Management. Artech House.
• Kelso, R. A. (2019). Construction Project Management: A Practical Guide for Building and Electrical Contractors. Wiley.
• Fleming, Q., & Koppelman, J.M. (2016). Earned Value Project Management. PMI.
• Heldman, K. (2018). PMP Project Management Professional Exam Study Guide. Wiley.
• Harrison, F., & Lock, D. (2017). Advanced Project Management: A Structurational Approach. Gower Publishing.
• Schwalbe, K. (2015). Information Technology Project Management. Cengage Learning.
• Dyson, R. G. (2004). Strategic development and SWOT analysis at the University of Warwick. European Journal of Operational Research, 152(3), 631-640.